| Literature DB >> 25843756 |
Francesco Martinelli1, Anna Giulia Balducci2, Alessandra Rossi1, Fabio Sonvico1, Paolo Colombo1, Francesca Buttini3.
Abstract
In this work three capsule-based dry powder inhalers, available for generics product development, were compared. Two technologically different dry powder formulations were used in order to relate the capsule piercing position and motion in the device to their aerodynamic performance. A "pierce and inhale" design, in which the capsules pierced with RS01, HandiHaler or Turbospin devices were aerosolized in the same device or transferred and aerosolized with another device, was constructed and carried out. The results obtained showed that two dry powder formulations, i.e., a drug/lactose blend or a carrier-free powder, aerosolized using capsule based inhalers, performed differently. The aerosolization of drug carrier mixture in terms of drug dispersion and emitted dose, was more sensible to the piercing and device combination than the carrier free powder. The motion of the capsule during the aerosolization boosted the powder emission, whereas the powder disaggregation was more influenced by the airflow pattern around the capsule and inside the inhaler turbulence chamber.Entities:
Keywords: Capsule motion; Dry powder inhaler; Formoterol fumarate; HandiHaler; RS01; Spray-dried insulin; Turbospin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25843756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pharm ISSN: 0378-5173 Impact factor: 5.875