Literature DB >> 31050911

Moving From Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition to Targeting DNA Repair and DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy.

Charlie Gourley1, Judith Balmaña2,3, Jonathan A Ledermann4, Violeta Serra3, Rebecca Dent5, Sibylle Loibl6, Eric Pujade-Lauraine7, Simon J Boulton8,9.   

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway coordinates the identification, signaling, and repair of DNA damage caused by endogenous or exogenous factors and regulates cell-cycle progression with DNA repair to minimize DNA damage being permanently passed through cell division. Severe DNA damage that cannot be repaired may trigger apoptosis; as such, the DDR pathway is of crucial importance as a cancer target. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is the best-known element of the DDR, and several PARP inhibitors have been licensed. However, there are approximately 450 proteins involved in DDR, and a number of these other targets are being investigated in the laboratory and clinic. We review the most recent evidence for the clinical effect of PARP inhibition in breast and ovarian cancer and explore expansion into the first-line setting and into other tumor types. We critique the evidence for patient selection techniques and summarize what is known about mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance. We then discuss what is known about the preclinical rationale for targeting other members of the DDR pathway and the associated tumor cell genetics that may confer sensitivity to these agents. Examples include DNA damage sensors (MLH1), damage signaling molecules (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-related and Rad3-related; CHK1/2; DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit; WEE1; CDC7), or effector proteins for repair (POLQ [also referred to as POLθ], RAD51, poly [ADP-ribose] glycohydrolase). Early-phase clinical trials targeting some of these molecules, either as a single agent or in combination, are discussed. Finally, we outline the challenges that must be addressed to maximize the therapeutic opportunity that targeting DDR provides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31050911     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

Review 1.  The role of cell signaling in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in the regulation of tumor cell survival in response to sorafenib and neratinib.

Authors:  Laurence A Booth; Jane L Roberts; Paul Dent
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Spectrum of Pathogenic Germline Mutations in Chinese Lung Cancer Patients through Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Panwen Tian; Xiangyang Cheng; Zhengyi Zhao; Yuzi Zhang; Celimuge Bao; Yanyan Wang; Shangli Cai; Guowei Ma; Ying Huang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  CRISPR/CAS9-based DNA damage response screens reveal gene-drug interactions.

Authors:  Dan Su; Xu Feng; Medina Colic; Yunfei Wang; Chunchao Zhang; Chao Wang; Mengfan Tang; Traver Hart; Junjie Chen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-01-16

Review 4.  Synthetic Lethality in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Akshaya Chandrasekaran; Kevin M Elias
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  BoxCar and shotgun proteomic analyses reveal molecular networks regulated by UBR5 in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yiwu Yan; Bo Zhou; Yeon-Joo Lee; Sungyong You; Michael R Freeman; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  PARP Inhibition in Cancer: An Update on Clinical Development.

Authors:  Esha Sachdev; Roya Tabatabai; Varun Roy; B J Rimel; Monica M Mita
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  Structural Variants at the BRCA1/2 Loci are a Common Source of Homologous Repair Deficiency in High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Patricia Roxburgh; Charlie Gourley; Colin A Semple; Ailith Ewing; Alison Meynert; Michael Churchman; Graeme R Grimes; Robert L Hollis; C Simon Herrington; Tzyvia Rye; Clare Bartos; Ian Croy; Michelle Ferguson; Mairi Lennie; Trevor McGoldrick; Neil McPhail; Nadeem Siddiqui; Suzanne Dowson; Rosalind Glasspool; Melanie Mackean; Fiona Nussey; Brian McDade; Darren Ennis; Lynn McMahon; Athena Matakidou; Brian Dougherty; Ruth March; J Carl Barrett; Iain A McNeish; Andrew V Biankin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Comprehensive analysis of DNA damage repair genes reveals pathogenic variants beyond BRCA and suggests the need for extensive genetic testing in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli; Valentina Zampiga; Ilaria Cangini; Valentina Arcangeli; Mila Ravegnani; Martina Valgiusti; Sara Pini; Stefano Tamberi; Giulia Bartolini; Alessandro Passardi; Giovanni Martinelli; Daniele Calistri; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Fabio Falcini; Rita Danesi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Anti-tumoural activity of the G-quadruplex ligand pyridostatin against BRCA1/2-deficient tumours.

Authors:  Florian J Groelly; Manuela Porru; Jutta Zimmer; Hugo Benainous; Yanti De Visser; Anastasiya A Kosova; Serena Di Vito; Violeta Serra; Anderson Ryan; Carlo Leonetti; Alejandra Bruna; Annamaria Biroccio; Madalena Tarsounas
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 12.137

10.  ATMIN Suppresses Metastasis by Altering the WNT-Signaling Pathway via PARP1 in MSI-High Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yue-Ju Li; Cheng-Ning Yang; Mark Yen-Ping Kuo; Wei-Ting Lai; Tai-Sheng Wu; Been-Ren Lin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.