Literature DB >> 31049248

The Effect of Mode of Delivery on Newborn Hearing Screening Results.

Selis Gülseven Güven1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Congenital hearing loss is one of the most important public health problems with a frequency of about 1-6 per 1000 live births all over the world. Although neonatal hearing screening tests are important for the timely detection and rehabilitation of hearing loss, determining the factors that may affect the screening results will contribute greatly to the development of screening programs. In this study, the effects of the modes of delivery on the results of tests in the screening program was investigated.
METHODS: In this study, the results of 10.575 newborns who were screened according to the National Neonatal Hearing Screening Protocol between January 2013 and May 2017 were evaluated. The screening test results of 2.653 newborns were examined retrospectively according to the type of delivery after candidates were excluded according to the exclusion criteria and risk factors for hearing loss. Of these newborns, 1.571 (59.2%) were born by normal delivery and 1.082 (40.8%) by cesarean section. Screening test results were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed among the 2.653 neonatal hearing screening test results in terms of mode of delivery (p>0.05). In both delivery modes, the rate of false positive was found to be high (81.9%) in the first hearing screening test of newborns, and this rate decreased in the second screening test (14.5%).
CONCLUSION: The mode of delivery has no significant effect on the neonatal hearing screening results; however, the observation that neonates had been more successful in the second screening test in both groups suggests that the test protocol should be re-evaluated in terms of timing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mode of delivery; hearing; neonatal screening; otoacoustic emissions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31049248      PMCID: PMC6461335          DOI: 10.5152/tao.2019.3940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 2667-7466


  12 in total

1.  [Age influence in otoacoustic emissions for hearing loss screening in infants].

Authors:  P Torrico; C Gómez; J López-Ríos; Ma C de Cáceres; G Trinidad; M Serrano
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2004-04

2.  Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test.

Authors:  Tatiana Smolkin; Orna Mick; Maisam Dabbah; Shraga Blazer; Galina Grakovsky; Noah Gabay; Arie Gordin; Imad R Makhoul
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Association between mode of delivery and failure of neonatal acoustic emission test: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tiejun Xiao; Yuru Li; Lifeng Xiao; Li Jiang; Qi Hu
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  [Perinatal factors affecting the detection of otoacoustic emissions in vaginally delivered, healthy newborns, during the first 48 hours of life].

Authors:  José M Sequi-Canet; María J Sala-Langa; José I Collar Del Castillo
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2013-09-27

6.  Delayed first otoacoustic emissions test decreases failure on neonatal hearing screening after caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Tatiana Smolkin; Sharehan Awawdeh; Shraga Blazer; Orna Mick; Imad R Makhoul
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.299

7.  Time after birth in relation to failure rate in newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  Luciana da Mata Lupoli; Laura Garcia; Adriana Ribeiro Tavares Anastasio; Ana Claudia Fontana
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes.

Authors:  Olubunmi V Akinpelu; Emilia Peleva; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Is discordance in TEOAE and AABR outcomes predictable in newborns?

Authors:  Bolajoko O Olusanya; Babatunde A Bamigboye
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Clinical practice for children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Andrée Durieux-Smith; Joanne Whittingham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of mode of delivery, maternal age, birth weight, gender and family history on screening hearing results: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hasan Ibrahim Al-Balas; Amjad Nuseir; Maha Zaitoun; Mahmoud Al-Balas; Almu'atasim Khamees; Hamzeh Al-Balas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-26

2.  Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results.

Authors:  Mahbod Kaveh; Seyedeh Nastaran Mirjalali; Mamak Shariat; Mohammad Reza Zarkesh
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.