BACKGROUND: Adherence to nonmedication recommendations is typically low, as seen in various health populations. Because literature on adherence to treatment recommendations made after neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis (MS) is lacking, this study evaluated adherence and reasons for nonadherence. Relationships between adherence to recommendations and various other factors in patients with MS were also evaluated. METHODS: Of 66 adult patients seen for neuropsychological testing at an MS center, 55 were eligible for this study. Forty-five patients (mean age, 43.4 years; 75.6% women) were reached by phone, and all agreed to an interview involving questions regarding adherence to treatment recommendations. Other information was obtained through retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Overall self-reported adherence to recommendations made from neuropsychological testing was 38%. Adherence rates varied by recommendation type: psychopharmacological management had the highest rate (80%), and referrals for cognitive rehabilitation had the lowest (6.5%). Reasons for nonadherence included needing more information and wanting to speak with one's physician regarding the recommendations. Adherence was associated with patients' ability to spontaneously recall at least some of their recommendations and with receiving both a written report and a phone call with test results. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to recommendations made after neuropsychological testing for patients with MS is low. Points of intervention may be to give directed feedback for each recommendation and to provide both a written report and a phone call with results and recommendations. Asking patients to repeat back the recommendations may be a simple and efficient way to increase understanding and improve adherence.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to nonmedication recommendations is typically low, as seen in various health populations. Because literature on adherence to treatment recommendations made after neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis (MS) is lacking, this study evaluated adherence and reasons for nonadherence. Relationships between adherence to recommendations and various other factors in patients with MS were also evaluated. METHODS: Of 66 adult patients seen for neuropsychological testing at an MS center, 55 were eligible for this study. Forty-five patients (mean age, 43.4 years; 75.6% women) were reached by phone, and all agreed to an interview involving questions regarding adherence to treatment recommendations. Other information was obtained through retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Overall self-reported adherence to recommendations made from neuropsychological testing was 38%. Adherence rates varied by recommendation type: psychopharmacological management had the highest rate (80%), and referrals for cognitive rehabilitation had the lowest (6.5%). Reasons for nonadherence included needing more information and wanting to speak with one's physician regarding the recommendations. Adherence was associated with patients' ability to spontaneously recall at least some of their recommendations and with receiving both a written report and a phone call with test results. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to recommendations made after neuropsychological testing for patients with MS is low. Points of intervention may be to give directed feedback for each recommendation and to provide both a written report and a phone call with results and recommendations. Asking patients to repeat back the recommendations may be a simple and efficient way to increase understanding and improve adherence.
Authors: Ralph H B Benedict; Diane Cookfair; Rebecca Gavett; Mark Gunther; Frederick Munschauer; Neeta Garg; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Katherine Treadaway; Gary Cutter; Amber Salter; Sharon Lynch; James Simsarian; John Corboy; Douglas Jeffery; Bruce Cohen; Ken Mankowski; Joseph Guarnaccia; Lawrence Schaeffer; Roy Kanter; David Brandes; Charles Kaufman; David Duncan; Ellen Marder; Arthur Allen; John Harney; Joanna Cooper; Douglas Woo; Olaf Stüve; Michael Racke; Elliot M Frohman Journal: J Neurol Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Bonnie I Glanz; Brian C Healy; David J Rintell; Sharon K Jaffin; Rohit Bakshi; Howard L Weiner Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Angélique Aa Gruters; Inez Hgb Ramakers; Frans Rj Verhey; Roy Pc Kessels; Marjolein E de Vugt Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.940