OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to test the psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and to explore the relationship between fatigue and sociodemographic variables in the general population. METHOD: A national representative sample of 1893 respondents was randomly selected from a pool of 4,000 Norwegians aged 19-81 years. A mailed questionnaire that included the FSS was used to measure fatigue severity. RESULTS: The FSS showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.88). The prevalence of high fatigue (FSS score > = 5) was 23.1% in the total sample. More women (26.2%) than men (19.8%) experienced high fatigue (p = 0.004). Respondents with chronic illness (more than six months) reported a higher mean (M = 4.69, SD = 1.35) than the rest of the sample (M = 3.67, SD = 1.17) (p<0.001). An inverse correlation was found between fatigue and level of formal education (r = 0.20, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of FSS were satisfactory. To avoid over-diagnosing people for high level of fatigue, the threshold for high fatigue probably should be 5 on the FSS scale instead of 4 as had been suggested originally, but further validation of the cut-off point is needed.
OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to test the psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and to explore the relationship between fatigue and sociodemographic variables in the general population. METHOD: A national representative sample of 1893 respondents was randomly selected from a pool of 4,000 Norwegians aged 19-81 years. A mailed questionnaire that included the FSS was used to measure fatigue severity. RESULTS: The FSS showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.88). The prevalence of high fatigue (FSS score > = 5) was 23.1% in the total sample. More women (26.2%) than men (19.8%) experienced high fatigue (p = 0.004). Respondents with chronic illness (more than six months) reported a higher mean (M = 4.69, SD = 1.35) than the rest of the sample (M = 3.67, SD = 1.17) (p<0.001). An inverse correlation was found between fatigue and level of formal education (r = 0.20, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of FSS were satisfactory. To avoid over-diagnosing people for high level of fatigue, the threshold for high fatigue probably should be 5 on the FSS scale instead of 4 as had been suggested originally, but further validation of the cut-off point is needed.
Authors: Neil B Alexander; George E Taffet; Frances McFarland Horne; Basil A Eldadah; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan Nayfield; Stephanie Studenski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anners Lerdal; Anders Kottorp; Caryl Gay; Bradley E Aouizerat; Carmen J Portillo; Kathryn A Lee Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alwin van Drongelen; Cécile R L Boot; Hynek Hlobil; Tjabe Smid; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Deirdre M O'Shea; Liselotte De Wit; Sarah M Szymkowicz; Molly E McLaren; Francis Talty; Vonetta M Dotson Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Sonja Vestergaard; Susan G Nayfield; Kushang V Patel; Basil Eldadah; Matteo Cesari; Luigi Ferrucci; Graziano Ceresini; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kathryn A Lee; Caryl Gay; Clive R Pullinger; Mary Dawn Hennessy; Rochelle S Zak; Bradley E Aouizerat Journal: Sleep Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Astrid K Wahl; Tone Rustøen; Berit Rokne; Anners Lerdal; Øistein Knudsen; Christine Miaskowski; Torbjørn Moum Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 4.147