| Literature DB >> 31048894 |
Zhezhe Cui1,2, Dingwen Lin1, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong2, Jinming Zhao1, Mei Lin1, Jing Ou1, Jinghua Zhao3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Guangxi is one of the provinces having the highest notification rate of tuberculosis in China. However, spatial and temporal patterns and the association between environmental diversity and tuberculosis notification are still unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31048894 PMCID: PMC6497253 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Classification of ecological environment variables and data sources.
| Classification | Variable (abbreviation) | Data sources |
|---|---|---|
| Climatic information | Altitude (ALT), Annual rainfall (AR), Duration of sunshine (DOS), Average temperature (AT), Average humidity (AH) | Guangxi Weather Bureau |
| Land use | Forest cover (FC), Trees in woodland forest (TWF), Trees in sparse forest (TSF), Scattered trees (ST), Trees planted by the side of farm houses, roads, Rivers and fields (TPS) | Guangxi Forestry Bureau |
| Socioeconomic information | Sex ratio (SR), Total gross domestic product (TGDP), Per capita gross domestic product (PGDP) | Guangxi Yearbook |
| Health resource | Special funds for TB control (TBF), Health funds (HF), Number of hospitals (NOH), Number of grass-root health facility (NGHF), Number of doctors (NOD), Number of other health workers (NOHW), Participation rate of new cooperative medical care insurance in rural areas (PRR) | Guangxi Health and Family Planning Commission |
| Health problem | Treatment success rate of TB (TSRTB), Prevalence of HIV/AIDS (PHIV) | Guangxi Health and Family Planning Commission |
Fig 1Monthly time series and forecast curve of TB notification in Guangxi, 2010–2017.
Forecasted values for tuberculosis notification in 2017.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecast | 3437 | 3542 | 4672 | 4467 | 4545 | 4407 | 4492 | 4245 | 4066 | 3924 | 3836 | 4313 | 49946 |
| Prediction intervals | 2628- | 2729- | 3855- | 3646- | 3721- | 3579- | 3660- | 3408- | 3225- | 3079- | 2988- | 3461- | 39980- |
Spatial autocorrelation analysis of tuberculosis notification results from 2010 to 2016.
| Year | Global spatial autocorrelation | Number of spatial autocorrelation locations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| high-high | low-low | high-low | low-high | not significant | ||
| 2010 | 0.536 | 19 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 69 |
| 2011 | 0.476 | 16 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 71 |
| 2012 | 0.512 | 15 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 71 |
| 2013 | 0.470 | 12 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 72 |
| 2014 | 0.520 | 12 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 74 |
| 2015 | 0.363 | 10 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 69 |
| 2016 | 0.451 | 15 | 28 | 5 | 3 | 61 |
Fig 2Cluster map for local spatial autocorrelation analysis of TB notification rate in Guangxi, 2010–2016.
Space-time clusters of tuberculosis cases in Guangxi from 2010 to 2016.
| Cluster | Central point of scan window | Latitude | Longitude | Radius | Cluster period | Number of districts in cluster | Number of cases in cluster | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most likely cluster | Xincheng | 24.07 | 108.66 | 77.32 | 2012/2/1 to 2015/7/31 | 9 | 29846 | 1.93 | 4957.7 | <0.001 |
| Secondary cluster # 1 | Cenxi | 22.92 | 110.99 | 126.52 | 2012/9/1 to 2016/2/29 | 15 | 27544 | 0.62 | 3445.89 | <0.001 |
| Secondary cluster # 2 | Lingchuan | 25.42 | 110.32 | 94.1 | 2012/9/1 to 2016/2/29 | 17 | 11965 | 0.63 | 1401.91 | <0.001 |
| Secondary cluster # 3 | Dongxing | 21.54 | 107.97 | 115.32 | 2014/4/1 to 2015/12/31 | 8 | 11072 | 1.32 | 373.81 | <0.001 |
RR: Relative risk; LLR: Log-likelihood ratio
Fig 33D cluster window of TB notification based on space-time scan in Guangxi, 2010–2016.
Results of panel models with spatial lag and spatial error correlation.
| Variable/ parameter | Ordinary least squares model | Fixed effects model | Random effects model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Estimate | Estimate | ||||
| Altitude | -0.0230 | 0.0484 | -35.9945 | 0.0439 | 0.0198 | 0.5463 |
| Annual rainfall | -0.2190 | 0.0030 | 0.0142 | 0.8108 | -0.0244 | 0.6994 |
| Duration of sunshine | -0.0961 | 0.0794. | -0.1005 | 0.0214 | -0.0963 | 0.0358 |
| Average temperature | -0.1070 | 0.4871 | 0.2208 | 0.3042 | 0.3891 | 0.0592. |
| Average humidity | -0.0327 | 0.8523 | -0.2010 | 0.216 | -0.0765 | 0.6542 |
| Forest cover | -0.1085 | 0.0095 | 0.1861 | 0.3742 | -0.0510 | 0.6329 |
| Trees in woodland Forest | 0.0070 | 0.5992 | 0.2318 | 0.0008 | 0.0182 | 0.5265 |
| Trees in sparse forest | 0.0117 | 0.0347 | 0.0127 | 0.0331 | 0.0063 | 0.2937 |
| Scattered trees | 0.0004 | 0.9457 | 0.0091 | 0.0605. | 0.0059 | 0.2252 |
| Trees planted by four sides | 0.0146 | 0.0122 | -0.0089 | 0.1893 | -0.0085 | 0.2085 |
| Sex ratio | -0.4416 | 0.0373 | 0.6122 | 0.2045 | 0.0075 | 0.985 |
| Total gross domestic product | -0.0489 | 0.0074 | 0.0074 | 0.7583 | -0.0028 | 0.9034 |
| Per capita gross domestic product | -0.1432 | <0.0001 | -0.0645 | 0.0016 | -0.0534 | 0.0105 |
| TB control fund | 0.0056 | 0.7048 | 0.0065 | 0.5622 | 0.0107 | 0.3657 |
| Health fund | -0.0062 | 0.5191 | -0.0128 | 0.0752. | -0.0073 | 0.3342 |
| Number of hospitals | -0.0506 | 0.0221 | 0.0181 | 0.5730 | -0.0050 | 0.8676 |
| Number of grass- root health facility | 0.0845 | 0.0001 | 0.1729 | 0.0141 | 0.0702 | 0.1029 |
| Number of doctors | -0.4139 | 0.0003 | -0.0029 | 0.9847 | -0.1197 | 0.4041 |
| Number of other health workers | 0.4332 | 0.0001 | 0.0477 | 0.7222 | 0.1434 | 0.284 |
| Treatment success rate of TB | -0.3841 | 0.0002 | -0.4089 | <0.0001 | -0.3940 | 0.0001 |
| Prevalence of HIV/AIDS | 0.0494 | <0.0001 | 0.0024 | 0.8175 | 0.0150 | 0.1532 |
| Participation rate of rural areas insurance | 0.3884 | 0.1330 | -1.1529 | <0.0001 | -0.6083 | 0.0156 |
| rho ( | -0.7930 | <0.0001 | -0.7578 | <0.0001 | -0.7469 | <0.0001 |
| lambda ( | 0.7879 | <0.0001 | 0.6384 | <0.0001 | 0.6487 | <0.0001 |
| SLM1c | 30.0490 | <0.0001 | ||||
a: rho, error variance parameter.
b: lambda, spatial autoregressive coefficient.
c: SLM1, Baltagi, Song and Koh SLM1 marginal test for checking random effects.
Significance codes
***, 0.001
**, 0.01
*, 0.05.