| Literature DB >> 31046753 |
Yoshiaki Nomura1, Ayako Okada2, Erika Kakuta3, Ryoko Otsuka4, Kaoru Sogabe4, Kiyoshige Yamane5, Taku Yamamoto6, Yuko Shigeta7, Shuji Shigemoto7, Takumi Ogawa7, Nobuhiro Hanada4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between oral health and malnutrition has been investigated in detail. The nutrition of elderly subjects in residential care homes is determined by caregivers, dietitians or nutritionists and managed by changing the consistency of their supplied food. However, few reports have described the relationship between oral condition and supplied food consistency. The objective of this study was to determine dentition status and care levels that correlate with supplied food consistency among elderly residents of care facilities. In addition, we estimated the care level at which ordinary food consistency can be supplied by caregivers who cannot diagnose dental status.Entities:
Keywords: Care level; Removable denture; Supplied food consistency; Tooth contact
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31046753 PMCID: PMC6498674 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0770-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Supplied food consistency against number of remaining teeth and presence or absence of dentures
| Supplied food consistency | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Remaining teeth (n) | Dentures | Ordinary meal | Processed meal |
| 0 | – | 0* | 1 |
| + | 38 | 36 | |
| 1–5 | – | 1* | 10 |
| + | 19 | 15 | |
| 6–10 | – | 1* | 6 |
| + | 18 | 17 | |
| 11–15 | – | 3* | 7 |
| + | 18 | 12 | |
| 16–20 | – | 10 | 6 |
| + | 14 | 6 | |
| 21+ | – | 21 | 11 |
| + | 2 | 4 | |
| Total | – | 36 | 41 |
| + | 109 | 90 | |
*Statistically significant difference, P < 0.05, (log-linear model). Subjects with fewer than 15 remaining teeth and not wearing dentures were significantly unlikely to consume ordinary meals
Cross tabulation of number of remaining teeth and tooth contact pairs in premolar and molar regions against supplied food consistency
| Supplied food consistency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary meal ( | Processed meal ( | P* | Processed meal | P** | |||
| Sliced ( | Mashed ( | Liquefied ( | |||||
| Number of remaining teeth | 9 (0–18) | 7 (0–13) | 0.048 | 7 (0–14) | 5 (0–13) | 3 (0–20) | 0.389 |
| 10.0 ± 8.9 | 8.2 ± 0.7 | 8.4 ± 8.4 | 7.2 ± 7.7 | 8.2 ± 10.6 | |||
| Presence of antagonistic teeth in premolar and molar regions | |||||||
| Natural teeth/natural teeth | 0 (0–2) | 0 (0–0) | 0.019 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–4) | 0.164 |
| 1.2 ± 1.9 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 1.8 | 0.7 ± 1.8 | 1.3 ± 2.2 | |||
| Natural teeth/denture | 0 (0–3) | 0 (0–2) | 0.041 | 0 (0–2) | 0 (0–2) | 0 (0–0) | 0.484 |
| 1.5 ± 2.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 1.1 ± 1.8 | 0 ± 0 | |||
| Dentures/denture | 3 (0–8) | 2 (0–8) | 0.047 | 2 (0–8) | 4 (0–8) | 0 (0–2) | 0.484 |
| 3.5 ± 3.5 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 3.6 | 3.7 ± 3.6 | ± 3.2 | |||
Data are shown as medians (25th–75th percentiles) and as the means ± SD. Number of remaining teeth decreased among residents who consumed processed meals, except for liquefied meals. When comparing ordinary and processed meals, the difference in the number of remaining teeth was statistically significant. Numbers of tooth contact pairs in the premolar and molar regions were also statistically significant. However, for food consistency divided into ordinary, sliced, mashed and liquefied, differences were not significant *Mann-Whitney U test, ** Kruskal Wallis test
Fig. 1Distribution of prescribed food consistency against care levels for the 276 elderly residents of the selected care facilities. The distribution was statistically significant by Fisher’s exact test (P < 0.001); * indicated the statistically significant cells by log-linear model (P < 0.05). Frequency of ordinary diet in support levels 1 and 2 and care levels 1, 2, and 3 are statistically significant (log-linear analysis). Most elderly residents requiring support levels 1(12/16, 75.0%) and 2(13/12, 86.6%) consumed ordinary meals. In contrast, most elderly residents requiring care levels 4 (35/47, 74.5%) and 5 (35/40, 87.5%) consumed processed meals
Logistic regression analysis of supplied food consistency by care levels, number of remaining teeth, and number of tooth contact pairs in premolar and molar regions
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | P | |
| Care level | 1.909 (1.589–2.294) | < 0.001 | 1.908 (1.586–2.294) | < 0.001 | 1.865 (1.546–2.250) | < 0.001 |
| Number of remaining teeth | 1.026 (0.998–1.055) | 0.070 | 1.025 (0.993–1.057) | 0.127 | ||
| Number of tooth contact pairs in premolar and molar regions | ||||||
| Natural teeth/natural teeth | 1.323 (1.110–1.577) | 0.002 | 1.263 (1.043–1.531) | 0.017 | ||
| Natural teeth/dentures | 1.259 (1.089–1.455) | 0.002 | 1.167 (0.991–1.374) | 0.063 | ||
| Dentures/dentures | 1.139 (1.039–1.249) | 0.006 | 1.101 (0.993–1.221) | 0.068 | ||
As shown in Fig. 1, are levels were strong confounders for supplied food consistency when considering that mastication is a major function of food consistency and that teeth are a major functional device for mastication. Supplied food consistencies were dichotomized as ordinary or processed food. By simple logistic regression analysis, tooth contact pairs in the premolar and molar regions were more important than the number of remaining teeth. When adjusted by care level, the number of remaining teeth was not statistically significant (Model 1). For the tooth contact pairs in the premolar and moral regions, only natural teeth/natural teeth contact was statistically significant (Model 2). The p-values of natural teeth/dentures and dentures/dentures contact were not statistically significant. However, p-values of these contact style were close to 0.05
Logistic regression analysis of ordinary and processed meals according to number of tooth contact pairs in the premolar and molar regions for subgroups by care levels
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | P | |
|---|---|---|
| Support required 1 and 2 and Care levels 1 and 2 ( | ||
| Natural teeth/natural teeth | 1.16 (0.85–1.77) | 0.341 |
| Natural teeth/dentures | 1.06 (0.84–1.33) | 0.581 |
| Dentures/dentures | 1.03 (0.87–1.20) | 0.722 |
| Care levels 3, 4, and 5 ( | ||
| Natural teeth/natural teeth | 1.43 (1.13–2.25) | 0.004 |
| Natural teeth/dentures | 1.42 (1.11–1.95) | 0.004 |
| Dentures/dentures | 1.26 (1.10–1.55) | 0.003 |
Effect of the number of tooth contact pairs on supplied food consistency by subgroup analysis by care levels. Care levels were dichotomized by ROC analysis. Food consistency was affected by the number of tooth contact pairs for the subjects with intensive care levels. In contrast, food consistency was not affected by the number of tooth contact pairs for subjects who needed partial care for daily living, including eating
For the subgroup of care levels 3, 4 and 5, post hoc sample size calculations were carried out. The sample size to obtain statistically significant odds ratios were 71, 55 and 50 samples for the number of natural teeth/natural teeth, natural teeth/dentures, and dentures/denture contact, respectively