Carole Fakhry1,2, Amanda L Blackford3, Geoff Neuner4, Weihong Xiao5, Bo Jiang5, Amit Agrawal6, Maura L Gillison5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Kimmel Institute of Immunotherapy, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Sidney Kimmel Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 6. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Detection of persistent oral human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA may be associated with recurrence of HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of oral HPV DNA detection and associations with disease outcomes in patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, 2-institution, tertiary referral center study of 396 patients with newly diagnosed oral cavity or oropharyngeal HNSCC was performed from July 11, 2011, to May 7, 2016. Oral rinse samples were prospectively collected at diagnosis and at completion of primary therapy. Weekly oral rinse samples were collected during radiotherapy. Purified tumor and oral rinse sample DNA were evaluated for 37 HPV types, and viral load was quantified by type-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cancers were stratified by tumor HPV status, and HPV was classified as tumor type if identical to that detected in the tumor or nontumor type. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of HPV DNA before, during, and after therapy. Associations between tumor-type and nontumor-type oral HPV DNA detection and recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 396 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 19-96 years]; 295 [74.5%] men; and 354 [89.4%] white race/ethnicity), 217 had oropharyngeal cancer; 170, oral cavity cancer; and 9, unknown primary HNSCC. The prevalence of oral HPV detection at diagnosis was higher among patients with HPV-positive compared with HPV-negative HNSCC (24 of 194 [84.2%] vs 170 of 202 [12.4%]; P < .001). Oral HPV-16 DNA had an 81% sensitivity and 100% specificity for HPV-16-positive HNSCC. The prevalence and load of tumor-type HPV decreased significantly during primary therapy with odds ratio for probability of infection with each increasing month after diagnosis (0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52; P < .001), whereas those of nontumor types did not (1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.06; P = .62). Current smoking was significantly associated with a reduced clearance of tumor-type HPV DNA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93). Two-year overall survival was significantly lower among the HPV-positive patients with persistent detection of tumor-type HPV after therapy than among those without detectable tumor-type DNA after therapy (68% vs 95%; adjusted HR, 6.61; 95% CI, 1.86-23.44; P = .003), as was recurrence-free survival (55% vs 88%; adjusted HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.71-8.09; P < .001). No associations were observed for nontumor type HPV DNA among patients with HPV-positive or HPV-negative HNSCC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prevalence and viral load of tumor-type HPV DNA decreased rapidly with therapy, and persistent detection was associated with increased risk of recurrence and death. Analysis of tumor type HPV DNA has considerable promise as a biomarker for treatment response and risk of progression.
IMPORTANCE: Detection of persistent oral human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA may be associated with recurrence of HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dynamics of oral HPV DNA detection and associations with disease outcomes in patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, 2-institution, tertiary referral center study of 396 patients with newly diagnosed oral cavity or oropharyngeal HNSCC was performed from July 11, 2011, to May 7, 2016. Oral rinse samples were prospectively collected at diagnosis and at completion of primary therapy. Weekly oral rinse samples were collected during radiotherapy. Purified tumor and oral rinse sample DNA were evaluated for 37 HPV types, and viral load was quantified by type-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cancers were stratified by tumor HPV status, and HPV was classified as tumor type if identical to that detected in the tumor or nontumor type. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of HPV DNA before, during, and after therapy. Associations between tumor-type and nontumor-type oral HPV DNA detection and recurrence-free and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 396 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 19-96 years]; 295 [74.5%] men; and 354 [89.4%] white race/ethnicity), 217 had oropharyngeal cancer; 170, oral cavity cancer; and 9, unknown primary HNSCC. The prevalence of oral HPV detection at diagnosis was higher among patients with HPV-positive compared with HPV-negative HNSCC (24 of 194 [84.2%] vs 170 of 202 [12.4%]; P < .001). Oral HPV-16 DNA had an 81% sensitivity and 100% specificity for HPV-16-positive HNSCC. The prevalence and load of tumor-type HPV decreased significantly during primary therapy with odds ratio for probability of infection with each increasing month after diagnosis (0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52; P < .001), whereas those of nontumor types did not (1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.06; P = .62). Current smoking was significantly associated with a reduced clearance of tumor-type HPV DNA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93). Two-year overall survival was significantly lower among the HPV-positive patients with persistent detection of tumor-type HPV after therapy than among those without detectable tumor-type DNA after therapy (68% vs 95%; adjusted HR, 6.61; 95% CI, 1.86-23.44; P = .003), as was recurrence-free survival (55% vs 88%; adjusted HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.71-8.09; P < .001). No associations were observed for nontumor type HPV DNA among patients with HPV-positive or HPV-negative HNSCC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Prevalence and viral load of tumor-type HPV DNA decreased rapidly with therapy, and persistent detection was associated with increased risk of recurrence and death. Analysis of tumor type HPV DNA has considerable promise as a biomarker for treatment response and risk of progression.
Authors: Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Qiang Zhang; K Kian Ang; Randal S Weber; David I Rosenthal; Denis Soulieres; Harold Kim; Craig Silverman; Adam Raben; Thomas J Galloway; André Fortin; Elizabeth Gore; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Maura L Gillison; Marcie List; Quynh-Thu Le Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maura L Gillison; Tatevik Broutian; Robert K L Pickard; Zhen-you Tong; Weihong Xiao; Lisa Kahle; Barry I Graubard; Anil K Chaturvedi Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Theresa Guo; Jesse R Qualliotine; Patrick K Ha; Joseph A Califano; Young Kim; John R Saunders; Ray G Blanco; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Zhe Zhang; Christine H Chung; Ana Kiess; Christine G Gourin; Wayne Koch; Jeremy D Richmon; Nishant Agrawal; David W Eisele; Carole Fakhry Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James S Lewis; Beth Beadle; Justin A Bishop; Rebecca D Chernock; Carol Colasacco; Christina Lacchetti; Joel Todd Moncur; James W Rocco; Mary R Schwartz; Raja R Seethala; Nicole E Thomas; William H Westra; William C Faquin Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Aimée R Kreimer; Christine M Pierce Campbell; Hui-Yi Lin; William Fulp; Mary R Papenfuss; Martha Abrahamsen; Allan Hildesheim; Luisa L Villa; Jorge J Salmerón; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kelly Y Kim; Quynh-Thu Le; Sue S Yom; Raymond H W Ng; K C Allen Chan; Scott V Bratman; John J Welch; Rao L Divi; Raymond A Petryshyn; Barbara A Conley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gypsyamber D'Souza; William H Westra; Steven J Wang; Annemieke van Zante; Alicia Wentz; Nicole Kluz; Eleni Rettig; William R Ryan; Patrick K Ha; Hyunseok Kang; Justin Bishop; Harry Quon; Ana P Kiess; Jeremy D Richmon; David W Eisele; Carole Fakhry Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Helen C Stankiewicz Karita; Amalia Magaret; Meei-Li Huang; Keith R Jerome; Quinne Feng; Anna Wald Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jean-Luc Prétet; Véronique Dalstein; Antoine Touzé; Agnès Beby-Defaux; Patrick Soussan; Élise Jacquin; Philippe Birembaut; Christine Clavel; Christiane Mougin; Alexandra Rousseau; Jean Lacau Saint Guily Journal: Clin Exp Med Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Aimée R Kreimer; Anil K Chaturvedi; Laia Alemany; Devasena Anantharaman; Freddie Bray; Mary Carrington; John Doorbar; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Carole Fakhry; Robert L Ferris; Maura Gillison; D Neil Hayes; Allan Hildesheim; Shao Hui Huang; Luiz P Kowalski; Krystle A Lang Kuhs; James Lewis; Douglas R Lowy; Hisham Mehanna; Andy Ness; Michael Pawlita; Maisa Pinheiro; John Schiller; Meredith S Shiels; Joseph Tota; Lisa Mirabello; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Tim Waterboer; William Westra; Stephen Chanock; Paul Brennan Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Kyle J Lafata; Yushi Chang; Chunhao Wang; Yvonne M Mowery; Irina Vergalasova; Donna Niedzwiecki; David S Yoo; Jian-Guo Liu; David M Brizel; Fang-Fang Yin Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Susanne Flach; Karen Howarth; Sophie Hackinger; Christodoulos Pipinikas; Pete Ellis; Kirsten McLay; Giovanni Marsico; Tim Forshew; Christoph Walz; Christoph A Reichel; Olivier Gires; Martin Canis; Philipp Baumeister Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 9.075