Literature DB >> 31045663

Ten-Year Outcomes of Selective Fusions for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Craig Louer1, Burt Yaszay2, Madeline Cross2, Carrie E Bartley2, Tracey P Bastrom2, Suken A Shah3, Baron Lonner4, Patrick J Cahill5, Amer Samdani6, Vidyadhar V Upasani2, Peter O Newton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selective fusions of the structural curve remain a common treatment strategy for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, yet long-term outcomes are not well-understood. The purpose of this study was to report 10-year prospective radiographic and patient-rated outcomes of selective fusions of the main thoracic (MT) or thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, with particular attention to the behavior of the uninstrumented, compensatory curve.
METHODS: A prospectively collected multicenter database was used to identify patients who had been followed regularly for least 10 years after a selective MT or TL/L fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Interval radiographs were evaluated for coronal and sagittal Cobb angles as well as overall coronal balance. Scores on the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-24) were catalogued and evaluated. Radiographic outcomes and SRS-24 scores were compared between preoperative and postoperative time points using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Individual patient records were screened for recent curve progression of >5°, and these cases were methodically evaluated.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with selective fusions (21 MT and 30 TL/L) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had been followed for at least 10 years were identified. The instrumented MT and TL/L curves were corrected by an average of 51% and 60%, respectively, at 10 years. The uninstrumented, compensatory curves had gradual spontaneous correction that approached the magnitude of the fused curve at 5 years postoperatively, with the correction maintained at 10 years. This led to excellent coronal balance. A subgroup of patients had recent progression of the primary curve adjacent to the prior fusion or within the instrumented segments, resulting in a compensatory progression of the uninstrumented curve. On the whole, SRS scores did not decrease during follow-up, and no patient had secondary operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Selective fusion of a primary thoracic or lumbar curve in properly selected patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis will result in spontaneous correction of the uninstrumented curve and a durable result for at least 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31045663     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

Review 1.  Restoring sagittal and frontal balance following posterior instrumented fusion.

Authors:  Ozgur Dede; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

2.  Discovering the association between the pre- and post-operative 3D spinal curve patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Suken Shah; Burt Yaszay; Peter Newton
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 3.  Quantitative imaging of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: shifting the paradigm from diagnostic to comprehensive prognostic evaluation.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Chamith R Rajapaske; Ravinder Reddy; Bassel Diebo; Patrick Knott; Brandon C Jones; Dushyant Kumar; Winnie Zhu; Edmond Lou; Nadav Shapira; Peter Noel; Victor Ho-Fung; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-31

4.  CORR Insights®: Is the Combination of Convex Compression for the Proximal Thoracic Curve and Concave Distraction for the Main Thoracic Curve Using Separate-rod Derotation Effective for Correcting Shoulder Balance and Thoracic Kyphosis?

Authors:  Kent A Reinker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Is the Combination of Convex Compression for the Proximal Thoracic Curve and Concave Distraction for the Main Thoracic Curve Using Separate-rod Derotation Effective for Correcting Shoulder Balance and Thoracic Kyphosis?

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Sehan Park; Dong-Ho Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Jae Hwan Cho; Jae Woo Park; Kun-Bo Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  The Importance of Lumbar Curve Flexibility and Apical Vertebral Rotation for the Prediction of Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction in Selective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 C Curves: Retrospective Cohort Study with a Mean Follow-Up of More than 10 years.

Authors:  Ozcan Kaya; Deniz Kara; Halil Gok; Sinan Kahraman; Tunay Sanlı; Selhan Karadereler; Meric Enercan; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04-29

7.  Long-Term Follow-up of Posterior Selective Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 10-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Yu Chen; Jie Shao; Junke Zhoutian; Fei Wang; Ziqiang Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Laura Hartley; Mattia Zappalà; Uzo Ehiogu; Nicola R Heneghan; Adrian Gardner
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-30

9.  Complications, Reoperations, and Mid-Term Outcomes Following Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Max Shin; Gabriel R Arguelles; Patrick J Cahill; John M Flynn; Keith D Baldwin; Jason B Anari
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-06-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.