Literature DB >> 33517495

Quantitative imaging of the spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: shifting the paradigm from diagnostic to comprehensive prognostic evaluation.

Saba Pasha1, Chamith R Rajapaske2,3, Ravinder Reddy3, Bassel Diebo4, Patrick Knott5, Brandon C Jones3, Dushyant Kumar3, Winnie Zhu6, Edmond Lou7, Nadav Shapira3, Peter Noel3, Victor Ho-Fung6, Diego Jaramillo8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to provide a perspective review of the available quantitative imaging modalities of the spine for prognostic evaluation of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
METHODS: A technical description of the current imaging technologies for quantitative assessment of the pediatric spine with scoliosis was provided, and the pros and cons of each method were discussed. Imaging modalities that quantify the overall 3D alignment of the spine as well as the structural specification of the spinal bone, intervertebral disc, endplates, and ligaments as it pertains to development and progression of the idiopathic spinal deformities in adolescents were discussed.
RESULTS: Low-dose and microdose stereoradiography, ultrasound, and rasterstereography provide quantitative imaging of the 3D spinal alignment with low or no radiation in standing posture which allows repetitive imaging for early detection of the curve development. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, including ultrashort dual-echo time and T1-rho can provide quantitative assessment of the spinal tissues relevant to development of idiopathic spinal deformity in pediatric population. New computed tomography scans that uses dual-energy can provides high-resolution measure of the current-state of the bone quality and morphology as well as the osteogenic properties of the bone by quantitative evaluation of the bone marrow.
CONCLUSION: The presented imaging modalities can provide a wide spectrum of quantifiable information relevant to development and progression of the spinal deformity. Clinical application of these technologies can change the paradigm in clinical assessment of the pediatric scoliosis by improving our understanding of the pathogenesis of the idiopathic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis; Magnetic resonance; Quantitative Medical Imaging; Rasterstereography; Spine; Ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 33517495     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02883-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  68 in total

1.  The Link Between the 3D Spino-pelvic Alignment and Vertebral Body morphology in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Woudbhav N Sankar; Rene M Castelein
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-01

2.  Incidence of cancer in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated 25 years previously.

Authors:  Ane Simony; Emil Jesper Hansen; Steen Bach Christensen; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Osterheden Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth.

Authors:  X Guo; W W Chau; Y L Chan; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

4.  Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth modulation.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Bone Remodeling and Disc Morphology in the Distal Unfused Spine After Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Lachlan Smith; Wudbhav N Sankar
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-09

6.  A reduced-order model of the spine to study pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  Sunder Neelakantan; Prashant K Purohit; Saba Pasha
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-10-13

7.  A hierarchical classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Identifying the distinguishing features in 3D spinal deformities.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Pedram Hassanzadeh; Malcolm Ecker; Victor Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  3D spinal and rib cage predictors of brace effectiveness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Saba Pasha
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Three-dimensional classification of the Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using coronal and lateral spinal radiographs.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Victor Ho-Fung; Malcolm Eker; Sarah Nossov; Michael Francavilla
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Differences in early sagittal plane alignment between thoracic and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tom P C Schlösser; Suken A Shah; Samantha J Reichard; Kenneth Rogers; Koen L Vincken; René M Castelein
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.