Literature DB >> 31043828

Impact of spleen-preserving total gastrectomy on postoperative infectious complications and 5-year overall survival: systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.

A Aiolfi1, E Asti1, S Siboni1, D Bernardi1, E Rausa1, G Bonitta1, L Bonavina1.   

Abstract

Background: The role of splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer is still debated. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to provide more-robust evidence about the effect of spleen-preserving total gastrectomy on postoperative infectious complications, overall morbidity, and 5-year overall survival (os).
Methods: PubMed, embase, and the Web of Science were consulted. Pooled effect measures were calculated using an inverse-variance weighted or Mantel-Haenszel in random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I 2 index and Cochran Q-test.
Results: Three randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2018 were included. Overall, 451 patients (50.1%) underwent open total gastrectomy with spleen preservation and 448 (49.9%) underwent open total gastrectomy with splenectomy. The patients ranged in age from 24 to 78 years. No differences were found in the number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.317), the reoperation rate (p = 0.871), or hospital length of stay (p = 0.347). The estimated pooled risk ratios for infectious complications, overall morbidity, and mortality were 1.53 [95% confidence interval (ci): 1.09 to 2.14; p = 0.016], 1.51 (95% ci: 1.11 to 2.05; p = 0.008), and 1.23 (95% ci: 0.40 to 3.71; p = 0.719) respectively. The estimated pooled hazard ratio for 5-year os was 1.06 (95% ci: 0.78 to 1.45; p = 0.707). Conclusions: Spleen-preserving total gastrectomy should be considered in patients with curable gastric cancer because it is significantly associated with decreased postoperative infectious complications and overall morbidity, with no difference in the 5-year os. Those observations appear worthwhile for establishing better evidence-based treatment for gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-year overall survival; Gastric cancer; infectious complications; spleen preservation; splenectomy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31043828      PMCID: PMC6476435          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  43 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Impact of splenectomy for lymph node dissection on long-term surgical outcome in gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Y Lee; S H Noh; W J Hyung; J H Lee; K H Lah; S H Choi; J S Min
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Immunosuppressive factor from the spleen in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  H Kanayama; R Hamazoe; Y Osaki; N Shimizu; M Maeta; S Koga
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Risk of infection and death among post-splenectomy patients.

Authors:  N Bisharat; H Omari; I Lavi; R Raz
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.072

5.  Splenectomy in proximal gastric cancer: frequency of lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus.

Authors:  S P Mönig; P H Collet; S E Baldus; K Schmackpfeffer; W Schröder; J Thiele; H P Dienes; A H Hölscher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Risk factors for superficial incisional surgical site infection after gastrectomy: analysis of patients enrolled in a prospective randomized trial comparing skin closure methods.

Authors:  Shunji Endo; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Kazumasa Fujitani; Junya Fujita; Shigeyuki Tamura; Makoto Yamasaki; Shogo Kobayashi; Yusuke Akamaru; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Junzo Shimizu; Koji Umeshita; Toshinori Ito; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Suppression of T-cell function in gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy with splenectomy: implications of splenic autotransplantation.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Okuno; Akira Tanaka; Hironori Shigeoka; Norihiko Hirai; Isao Kawai; Yoshinori Kitano; Masayuki Yasutomi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  A prospective randomized study comparing D2 total gastrectomy versus D2 total gastrectomy plus splenectomy in 187 patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Attila Csendes; Patricio Burdiles; Jorge Rojas; Italo Braghetto; Juan Carlos Diaz; Fernando Maluenda
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Xin-Zu Chen; Jian-Kun Hu; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Association of splenectomy with postoperative complications in patients with proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Authors:  Jürgen Weitz; David P Jaques; Murray Brennan; Martin Karpeh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Normal and Abnormal Postoperative Imaging Findings after Gastric Oncologic and Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Cheong Il Shin; Se Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 2.  Improvement in distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Deng Ning; Xiao-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Analysis of the Factors Affecting Survival in the Patients who Underwent Curative-Intent Gastrectomy due to Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Serkan Karaisli; Emine Ozlem Gur; Oguzhan Ozsay; Fevzi Cengiz; Ahmet Er; Murat Kemal Atahan; Yasin Peker; Osman Nuri Dilek; Mehmet Haciyanli
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.