Literature DB >> 31043810

Establishing funding rates for colonoscopy and gastroscopy procedures in Ontario.

J Monakova1, J Wong1, I Blais1,2,3,4,5, A Langan2, N Ratansi3, D Morgan4, N N Baxter1,5.   

Abstract

Introduction: This paper describes the funding rates established in Ontario to reflect best practices in hospital-based care delivery for these endoscopic procedures: colonoscopy, colonoscopy biopsy, gastroscopy, gastroscopy biopsy, and colonoscopy combined with gastroscopy.
Methods: The funding rates are based on direct costs and were established using a micro-costing approach after receipt of inputs from 3 working groups and a review of the administrative data and literature, where applicable. The first group advised on nursing activities, time, and staffing ratios along the patient pathway for each of the procedures. The second group provided recommendations about the duration for each procedure, and the third group provided information about supplies and equipment, their use, and costs.
Results: The resulting funding rates are $161.18 for colonoscopy and $151.08 for gastroscopy (without accompanying interventions), $16.06 for colonoscopy biopsy and $8.22 for gastroscopy biopsy (added to the respective procedures), and $207.26 for combined colonoscopy and gastroscopy. Detailed costs for each component embedded in the rates are also provided. Conclusions: The rates came into effect in April 2018. The process and outcomes described here allowed for a transparent pricing mechanism in which funding follows the patient, clinical expert consensus is the basis for practice, and providers and payers both understand the components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy costs; funding rates; gastroscopy costs; micro-costing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31043810      PMCID: PMC6476446          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  11 in total

1.  The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.

Authors:  Dieter K Tscheulin; Florian Drevs
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-05-17

2.  Projected dynamics of colonoscopic screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cristian Gheorghe; Razvan Iacob; Liana Gheorghe; Bogdan Cotruta; Ion Bancila; Speranta Iacob; Dana Bucur; Dana Voinea; Irinel Popescu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

3.  A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminutive polyps.

Authors:  W R Kessler; T F Imperiale; R W Klein; R C Wielage; D K Rex
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Budget-impact model for colonoscopy cost calculation and comparison between 2 litre PEG+ASC and sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate or sodium phosphate oral bowel cleansing agents.

Authors:  H-J Gruss; A Cockett; R J Leicester
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Same-day bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams.

Authors:  Alfredo J Lucendo; Ángel Arias; Sonia González-Castillo; Teresa Angueira; Danila Guagnozzi; Mariluz Fernández-Fuente; Mercedes Serrano-Valverde; Marta Sánchez-Cazalilla; Oliver Chumillas; Maruja Fernández-Ordóñez; José M Tenías
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  A Comparison of Ambulatory Surgery Center Production Costs and Medicare Payments: Evidence on Colonoscopy and Endoscopy.

Authors:  Jean M Mitchell; Kathleen Carey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Healthcare Cost of Over-Diagnosis of Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Richard H Lash; Thomas M Deas; Frank H Wians
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Same day endoscopy and percutaneous liver biopsy: safety and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  J Aaron Cook; Stephen A Harrison
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Effectiveness and efficiency of CT-colonography compared to conventional colonoscopy for the early detection and diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Stürzlinger; Dieter Genser; Cora Hiebinger; Friederike Windisch
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-02-03

10.  Micro-costing studies in the health and medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Jennifer Prah Ruger
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.