Literature DB >> 31042443

Reciprocal intralimb transfer of skilled isometric force production.

Vikram A Rajan1, Robert M Hardwick2,3, Pablo A Celnik2.   

Abstract

Motor control theories propose that the same motor plans can be employed by different effectors (e.g., the hand and arm). Skills learned with one effector can therefore "transfer" to others, which has potential applications in clinical situations. However, evidence from adaptation suggests this effect is not reciprocal; learning can be generalized from proximal to distal effectors (e.g., arm to hand), but not from distal to proximal effectors (e.g., hand to arm). We propose that skill learning may not follow the same pattern, because it relies on multiple learning processes beyond error detection and correction. Participants learned a skill task involving the production of isometric forces. We assessed their ability to perform the task with the hand and arm. One group then trained to perform the task using only their hand, whereas a second group trained using only their arm. In a final assessment, we found that participants who trained with either effector improved their skill in performing the task with both their hand and arm. There was no change in a control group that did not train between assessments, indicating that gains were related to the training, not the multiple assessments. These results indicate that in contrast to adaptation, motor skills can generalize from both proximal to distal effectors and from distal to proximal effectors. We propose this is due to differences in the processes underlying skill acquisition as compared with adaptation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Prior research indicates that motor learning transfers from proximal to distal effectors, but not vice versa. However, this work focused on adapting existing behavior; we questioned whether different results would occur during learning of new motor skills. We found that the benefits of training on a skill task with either the hand or arm transferred across both effectors. This highlights important differences between adaptation and skill learning, and may allow therapeutic benefits for patients with impairments in specific effectors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor control; motor learning; movement control; movement skill learning; skill acquisition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31042443      PMCID: PMC6689780          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00840.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory.

Authors:  Aysha Keisler; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Byron Tang; Rebecca O'Malley; Rachel Salas; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Subtle cognitive deficits in severe alcohol addicts--do they show a specific profile?

Authors:  Frank A Wollenweber; Sarah Halfter; Elisabeth Brügmann; Christina Weinberg; Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Müller; Robert M Hardwick; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.864

5.  Deconstructing skill learning and its physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Danny Spampinato; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Motor Skills Are Strengthened through Reconsolidation.

Authors:  Nicholas F Wymbs; Amy J Bastian; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni; Ali Ghazizadeh; Roshni Ravindran; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Temporal dynamics of cerebellar and motor cortex physiological processes during motor skill learning.

Authors:  D Spampinato; P Celnik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Single Bout of Moderate Aerobic Exercise Improves Motor Skill Acquisition.

Authors:  Matthew A Statton; Marysol Encarnacion; Pablo Celnik; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fronto-striatal organization: Defining functional and microstructural substrates of behavioural flexibility.

Authors:  Laurel S Morris; Prantik Kundu; Nicholas Dowell; Daisy J Mechelmans; Pauline Favre; Michael A Irvine; Trevor W Robbins; Nathaniel Daw; Edward T Bullmore; Neil A Harrison; Valerie Voon
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  2 in total

1.  Skill acquisition is enhanced by reducing trial-to-trial repetition.

Authors:  Lore W E Vleugels; Stephan P Swinnen; Robert M Hardwick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Age-related increases in reaction time result from slower preparation, not delayed initiation.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Alexander D Forrence; M Gabriela Costello; Kathy Zackowski; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.974

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.