Importance: Physiological stenosis assessment is recommended to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable angina. Objective: To determine the association between all commonly used indices of physiological stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time in patients with stable angina. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data (without follow-up) collected over 1 year from 2 cardiac hospitals. Selected patients with stable angina and physiologically severe single-vessel coronary artery disease presenting for clinically driven elective PCI were included. Exposures: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were measured invasively. Immediately after this, patients maximally exercised on a catheter-table-mounted supine ergometer until they developed rate-limiting angina. Subsequent PCI was performed in most patients, followed by repeat maximal supine exercise testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations between FFR, iFR, HSR, CFR, and angina-limited exercise time were assessed using linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients. Additionally, the associations between the post-PCI increment in exercise time and baseline FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were assessed. Results: Twenty-three patients (21 [91.3%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [8.1] years) completed the pre-PCI component of the study protocol. Mean (SD) stenosis diameter was 74.6% (10.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) values were 0.54 (0.44-0.72) for FFR, 0.53 (0.38-0.83) for iFR, 1.67 (0.84-3.16) for HSR, and 1.35 (1.11-1.63) for CFR. Mean (SD) angina-limited exercise time was 144 (77) seconds. Anatomical stenosis characteristics were not significantly associated with angina-limited exercise time. Conversely, FFR (R2 = 0.27; P = .01), iFR (R2 = 0.46; P < .001), HSR (R2 = 0.39; P < .01), and CFR (R2 = 0.16; P < .05) were all associated with angina-limited exercise time. Twenty-one patients (19 [90.5%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [8.2] years) competed the full protocol of PCI, post-PCI physiological assessment, and post-PCI maximal exercise. After PCI, the median (IQR) FFR rose to 0.91 (0.85-0.96), median (IQR) iFR to 0.98 (0.94-0.99), and median (IQR) CFR to 2.73 (2.50-3.12), while the median (IQR) HSR fell to 0.16 (0.06-0.37) (P < .001 for all). The post-PCI increment in exercise time was most significantly associated with baseline iFR (R2 = 0.26; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In a selected group of patients with severe, single-vessel stable angina, FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were all modestly correlated with angina-limited exercise time to varying degrees. Notwithstanding the limited sample size, no clear association was demonstrated between anatomical stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time.
Importance: Physiological stenosis assessment is recommended to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable angina. Objective: To determine the association between all commonly used indices of physiological stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time in patients with stable angina. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data (without follow-up) collected over 1 year from 2 cardiac hospitals. Selected patients with stable angina and physiologically severe single-vessel coronary artery disease presenting for clinically driven elective PCI were included. Exposures: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were measured invasively. Immediately after this, patients maximally exercised on a catheter-table-mounted supine ergometer until they developed rate-limiting angina. Subsequent PCI was performed in most patients, followed by repeat maximal supine exercise testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations between FFR, iFR, HSR, CFR, and angina-limited exercise time were assessed using linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients. Additionally, the associations between the post-PCI increment in exercise time and baseline FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were assessed. Results: Twenty-three patients (21 [91.3%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [8.1] years) completed the pre-PCI component of the study protocol. Mean (SD) stenosis diameter was 74.6% (10.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) values were 0.54 (0.44-0.72) for FFR, 0.53 (0.38-0.83) for iFR, 1.67 (0.84-3.16) for HSR, and 1.35 (1.11-1.63) for CFR. Mean (SD) angina-limited exercise time was 144 (77) seconds. Anatomical stenosis characteristics were not significantly associated with angina-limited exercise time. Conversely, FFR (R2 = 0.27; P = .01), iFR (R2 = 0.46; P < .001), HSR (R2 = 0.39; P < .01), and CFR (R2 = 0.16; P < .05) were all associated with angina-limited exercise time. Twenty-one patients (19 [90.5%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [8.2] years) competed the full protocol of PCI, post-PCI physiological assessment, and post-PCI maximal exercise. After PCI, the median (IQR) FFR rose to 0.91 (0.85-0.96), median (IQR) iFR to 0.98 (0.94-0.99), and median (IQR) CFR to 2.73 (2.50-3.12), while the median (IQR) HSR fell to 0.16 (0.06-0.37) (P < .001 for all). The post-PCI increment in exercise time was most significantly associated with baseline iFR (R2 = 0.26; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In a selected group of patients with severe, single-vessel stable angina, FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were all modestly correlated with angina-limited exercise time to varying degrees. Notwithstanding the limited sample size, no clear association was demonstrated between anatomical stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time.
Authors: Sayan Sen; Javier Escaned; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Rodney A Foale; Rafael Mila; Jason Tarkin; Ricardo Petraco; Christopher Broyd; Richard Jabbour; Amarjit Sethi; Christopher S Baker; Micheal Bellamy; Mahmud Al-Bustami; David Hackett; Masood Khan; David Lefroy; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Carlo Di Mario; Jamil Mayet; Justin E Davies Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Franz-Josef Neumann; Miguel Sousa-Uva; Anders Ahlsson; Fernando Alfonso; Adrian P Banning; Umberto Benedetto; Robert A Byrne; Jean-Philippe Collet; Volkmar Falk; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; Akos Koller; Steen D Kristensen; Josef Niebauer; Dimitrios J Richter; Petar M Seferovic; Dirk Sibbing; Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker; Rashmi Yadav; Michael O Zembala Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Maria A C Christou; George C M Siontis; Demosthenes G Katritsis; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Justin E Davies; Zachary I Whinnett; Darrel P Francis; Charlotte H Manisty; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Keith Willson; Rodney A Foale; Iqbal S Malik; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jamil Mayet Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ricardo Petraco; Tim P van de Hoef; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Sayan Sen; Martijn A van Lavieren; Rodney A Foale; Martijn Meuwissen; Christopher Broyd; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Nicolas Foin; Iqbal S Malik; Ghada W Mikhail; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Carlo Di Mario; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek; Justin E Davies Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Guus A de Waard; Sayan Sen; Tim P van de Hoef; Ricardo Petraco; Mauro Echavarría-Pinto; Martijn A van Lavieren; Martijn Meuwissen; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek; Justin E Davies; Niels van Royen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christopher M Cook; Allen Jeremias; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Guus de Waard; Tim van de Hoef; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Martijn van Lavieren; Rasha Al Lamee; Yuetsu Kikuta; Yasutsugu Shiono; Ashesh Buch; Martijn Meuwissen; Ibrahim Danad; Paul Knaapen; Akiko Maehara; Bon-Kwon Koo; Gary S Mintz; Javier Escaned; Gregg W Stone; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Jan J Piek; Niels van Royen; Justin E Davies Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Christopher M Cook; Yousif Ahmad; James P Howard; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Amarjit Sethi; Gerald J Clesham; Kare H Tang; Sukhjinder S Nijjer; Paul A Kelly; John R Davies; Iqbal S Malik; Raffi Kaprielian; Ghada Mikhail; Ricardo Petraco; Firas Al-Janabi; Grigoris V Karamasis; Shah Mohdnazri; Reto Gamma; Rasha Al-Lamee; Thomas R Keeble; Jamil Mayet; Sayan Sen; Darrel P Francis; Justin E Davies Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rasha K Al-Lamee; Matthew J Shun-Shin; James P Howard; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher Rajkumar; David Thompson; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ricardo Petraco; John Davies; Thomas Keeble; Kare Tang; Iqbal Malik; Nina Bual; Christopher Cook; Yousif Ahmad; Henry Seligman; Andrew S P Sharp; Robert Gerber; Suneel Talwar; Ravi Assomull; Graham Cole; Niall G Keenan; Gajen Kanaganayagam; Joban Sehmi; Roland Wensel; Frank E Harrell; Jamil Mayet; Simon Thom; Justin E Davies; Darrel P Francis Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sashiananthan Ganesananthan; Christopher A Rajkumar; Michael Foley; David Thompson; Alexandra N Nowbar; Henry Seligman; Ricardo Petraco; Sayan Sen; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Simon A Thom; Roland Wensel; John Davies; Darrel Francis; Matthew Shun-Shin; James Howard; Rasha Al-Lamee Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 35.855