BACKGROUND: Coronary blood flow peaks in diastole when aortic blood pressure has fallen. Current models fail to completely explain this phenomenon. We present a new approach-using wave intensity analysis-to explain this phenomenon in normal subjects and to evaluate the effects of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHOD AND RESULTS: We measured simultaneous pressure and Doppler velocity with intracoronary wires in the left main stem, left anterior descending, and circumflex arteries of 20 subjects after a normal coronary arteriogram. Wave intensity analysis was used to identify and quantify individual pressure and velocity waves within the coronary artery circulation. A consistent pattern of 6 predominating waves was identified. Ninety-four percent of wave energy, accelerating blood forward along the coronary artery, came from 2 waves: first a pushing wave caused by left ventricular ejection-the dominant forward-traveling pushing wave; and later a suction wave caused by relief of myocardial microcirculatory compression-the dominant backward-traveling suction wave. The dominant backward-traveling suction wave (18.2+/-13.7 x 10(3) W m(-2)s(-1), 30%) was larger than the dominant forward-traveling pushing wave (14.3+/-17.6 x 10(3) W m(-2) s(-1), 22.3%, P =0.001) and was associated with a substantially larger increment in coronary blood flow velocity (0.51 versus 0.14 m/s, P <0.001). In LVH, the dominant backward-traveling suction wave percentage was significantly decreased (33.1% versus 26.9%, P =0.01) and inversely correlated with left ventricular septal wall thickness (r =-0.52, P <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Six waves predominantly drive human coronary blood flow. Coronary flow peaks in diastole because of the dominance of a "suction" wave generated by myocardial microcirculatory decompression. This is significantly reduced in LVH.
BACKGROUND: Coronary blood flow peaks in diastole when aortic blood pressure has fallen. Current models fail to completely explain this phenomenon. We present a new approach-using wave intensity analysis-to explain this phenomenon in normal subjects and to evaluate the effects of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). METHOD AND RESULTS: We measured simultaneous pressure and Doppler velocity with intracoronary wires in the left main stem, left anterior descending, and circumflex arteries of 20 subjects after a normal coronary arteriogram. Wave intensity analysis was used to identify and quantify individual pressure and velocity waves within the coronary artery circulation. A consistent pattern of 6 predominating waves was identified. Ninety-four percent of wave energy, accelerating blood forward along the coronary artery, came from 2 waves: first a pushing wave caused by left ventricular ejection-the dominant forward-traveling pushing wave; and later a suction wave caused by relief of myocardial microcirculatory compression-the dominant backward-traveling suction wave. The dominant backward-traveling suction wave (18.2+/-13.7 x 10(3) W m(-2)s(-1), 30%) was larger than the dominant forward-traveling pushing wave (14.3+/-17.6 x 10(3) W m(-2) s(-1), 22.3%, P =0.001) and was associated with a substantially larger increment in coronary blood flow velocity (0.51 versus 0.14 m/s, P <0.001). In LVH, the dominant backward-traveling suction wave percentage was significantly decreased (33.1% versus 26.9%, P =0.01) and inversely correlated with left ventricular septal wall thickness (r =-0.52, P <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Six waves predominantly drive human coronary blood flow. Coronary flow peaks in diastole because of the dominance of a "suction" wave generated by myocardial microcirculatory decompression. This is significantly reduced in LVH.
Authors: Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: John V Tyberg; Justin E Davies; Zhibin Wang; William A Whitelaw; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Nigel G Shrive; Darryl P Francis; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jiun-Jr Wang Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Justin E Davies; Iqbal S Malik; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Keith Willson; Rodney A Foale; Kim H Parker; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sabine Huke; Raghav Venkataraman; Michela Faggioni; Sirish Bennuri; Hyun S Hwang; Franz Baudenbacher; Björn C Knollmann Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 17.367