Literature DB >> 16840243

Classification accuracy of the test of memory malingering in traumatic brain injury: results of a known-groups analysis.

Kevin W Greve1, Kevin J Bianchini, Bridget M Doane.   

Abstract

This study used a known-groups design to determine the classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering (Tombaugh, 1996, 1997) in detecting cognitive malingering in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Forty-one of 161 TBI patients met Slick, Sherman, and Iverson (1999) criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction. Twenty-two no-incentive memory disorder patients were also included. The original cutoffs (<45) for Trial 2 and Retention demonstrated excellent specificity (less than a 5% false positive error rate) and impressive sensitivity (greater than 45%). However, these cutoffs are actually conservative in the context of mild TBI. Over 90% of the non-MND mild TBI sample scored 48 or higher on the Retention Trial and none scored less than 46 while 60% of the MND patients claiming mild TBI were detected at those levels. Trial 1 also demonstrated excellent classification accuracy. Application of these data to clinical practice is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16840243     DOI: 10.1080/13803390500263550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  2 in total

1.  Benefits and challenges of using logistic regression to assess neuropsychological performance validity: Evidence from a simulation study.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.373

2.  Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool: Influence of performance and symptom validity.

Authors:  Brigid Waldron-Perrine; Nicolette M Gabel; Katharine Seagly; A Zarina Kraal; Percival Pangilinan; Robert J Spencer; Linas Bieliauskas
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2019-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.