Literature DB >> 31039150

Addressing critical needs in the fight to end tuberculosis with innovative tools and strategies.

Mark Hatherill1, Richard E Chaisson2, Claudia M Denkinger3,4.   

Abstract

This month in PLOS Medicine we launched a Special Issue on New Tools and Strategies for Tuberculosis Diagnosis, Care, and Elimination. In this issue's Editorial, the Guest Editors Claudia Denkinger, Richard Chaisson, and Mark Hatherill highlight some of the research that will publish and how these studies focusing on discovery, clinical trials and implementation research collectively add to the prospects for reaching the EndTB targets of the WHO by 2035.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31039150      PMCID: PMC6490887          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Med        ISSN: 1549-1277            Impact factor:   11.069


More than 130 years after Koch first described the tubercle bacillus and its etiologic role in tuberculosis (TB) to the Physiologic Society of Berlin, TB is still responsible for an appalling human toll and is the leading single infectious cause of death worldwide [1]. In September 2018, the United Nations General Assembly held a High-Level Meeting on Tuberculosis during which multiple heads of state and ministers of health pledged to end the global TB epidemic by 2035, setting ambitious targets for diagnosing and treating cases, providing preventive therapy to those most at risk, and making investments in TB care and research [2]. It is clear that the modest decline in global TB incidence and mortality in recent years needs to be accelerated to reach the “End TB” targets for 2035 [3]. This can only be achieved if the implementation of current approaches to TB control is optimized and new tools and strategies for TB prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment are developed. This special issue highlights the breadth of the approaches currently available, promising new developments as well as identifying some of the challenges still ahead. The potential for impact of new strategies is not limited to biomedical intervention but includes societal and socioeconomic approaches to change the paradigm of TB case finding and treatment. In this issue, Rubinstein and colleagues evaluate conditional cash transfer as part of a social support policy to promote adherence to improve treatment outcomes for the most vulnerable TB patients [4]. Other approaches with potential to make substantial progress include strategies to engage private healthcare providers to find the missing millions of cases and efficiently refer patients to receive timely and appropriate treatment. This issue also takes a new look at old tools. In a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial, Hanrahan and colleagues showed that contact tracing, based on symptom screening and Xpert MTB/RIF testing (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA), did not increase the rate of TB treatment initiation compared to facility-based screening [5]. These findings highlight the need for more sensitive triage and diagnostic tests and raise questions about the role of symptoms as the principal entry point for TB screening in high-incidence countries of sub-Saharan Africa, given the success of a contact tracing strategy incorporating both symptom screening and chest radiography in Vietnam [6]. Host markers have been targeted most widely either with proteomic or transcriptomic approaches in the pursuit of a triage test that might even identify patients at the stage of incipient TB, i.e., in an asymptomatic phase with early disease. In this issue, Khatri and colleagues compared 16 transcriptional signatures on 24 data sets that span the geographic regions of the global epidemic [7]. Although the work confirms the promise of a three-gene transcript signature in particular [8], the feasibility of translation into an affordable, easy-to-use triage test for use in high-burden developing countries remains elusive, given the need for multiplexing and quantitation, based on costs of currently commercialized PCR chemistry and integrated instrumentation. An application as an incipient TB test for high-income countries, however, is becoming more and more realistic. A proteomic approach is more likely to be translated into an affordable triage test, provided that 3 or fewer markers are targeted. However, all published proteomic signatures, including the ones pursued by Scriba and colleagues, require broader validation considering different co-infections, including but not limited to HIV [9]. When it comes to non-sputum biomarker tests for stand-alone diagnosis, recent publications have demonstrated the potential of Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) for sensitive detection of active TB [10]. The potential impact of these novel, more sensitive tests in the pipeline can be discerned from the work by Huerga and colleagues in this issue showing that the only currently available commercial test targeting LAM, even at highly suboptimal sensitivity, can have a significant impact even outside of patient groups currently recommended by WHO [11]. The value of LAM as a marker for treatment monitoring in sputum is highlighted by Liu and colleagues [12]. Given that both phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is limited for drugs newly recommended for drug-resistant TB (e.g., bedaquiline), improved treatment monitoring tools are becoming even more important. Advances in treatment of TB in recent years have been limited to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB [13,14], but the treatment of drug-resistant TB still involves regimens with considerable toxicity and shortening the treatment of drug-susceptible TB has been difficult [15]. In this special issue, Savic and colleagues report on meticulous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics evaluations of drug penetration into pulmonary lesions in patients undergoing lung resection, providing important insights into how a number of currently available agents reach or don’t reach the site of disease [16]. These observations will be useful in designing and evaluating new regimens, as well as understanding the potential of new agents as they undergo preclinical evaluation. The limitations of our therapeutic armamentarium are apparent in the unacceptable mortality rate among HIV co-infected patients hospitalized with TB. Gupta-Wright and colleagues describe the development and validation of a simple clinical score, including urine LAM, to identify co-infected patients at higher risk of death both pre- and post-discharge [17]. Yet, even if we could identify these high-risk patients, changing patient outcomes with early and more effective interventions remains a major challenge. Our therapeutic limitations spotlight the critical need for more effective TB prevention. Recent trials show that shorter, simplified preventive drug regimens are possible [18]. In a Perspective, Churchyard and Swindells discuss the importance of strategies to target latent TB infection in high-risk populations and thus disrupt a reservoir for new infections in high-burden countries [19]. In another Perspective, Vekemans and colleagues discuss some of the recent breakthroughs in the search for an effective TB vaccine [20]. These include positive results from 2 vaccine trials of the subunit vaccine M72/AS01E and of Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) revaccination, which support empirical efficacy testing both for novel vaccine candidates and for existing vaccines using new approaches [21,22]. One such novel approach is aerosol vaccine delivery to the lung—the site of infection. In this issue, McShane and colleagues describe an experimental medicine trial to explore alternating aerosol and intradermal vaccination routes to boost the immune response to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85A [23]. The results highlight the importance of understanding mucosal and systemic immune responses to aerosolized candidate vaccines and the need to optimize tolerability of such vaccination regimens. Collectively, this special issue highlights the vibrant field of discovery, clinical trials, and implementation research that will enable the End TB targets of the World Health Organization. While there is much promise in new diagnostics, biosignatures, drugs, vaccines, and innovative implementation strategies, this special issue also highlights that, although we have come a long way from Koch, there is a long path still to be walked in order to bend the curve on this ancient disease.
  19 in total

1.  Genome-wide expression for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicohort analysis.

Authors:  Timothy E Sweeney; Lindsay Braviak; Cristina M Tato; Purvesh Khatri
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 30.700

2.  Household-Contact Investigation for Detection of Tuberculosis in Vietnam.

Authors:  Greg J Fox; Nguyen V Nhung; Guy B Marks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of bedaquiline on mortality in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn Schnippel; Norbert Ndjeka; Gary Maartens; Graeme Meintjes; Iqbal Master; Nazir Ismail; Jennifer Hughes; Hannetjie Ferreira; Xavier Padanilam; Rodolfo Romero; Julian Te Riele; Francesca Conradie
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 30.700

4.  Contact tracing versus facility-based screening for active TB case finding in rural South Africa: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (Kharitode TB).

Authors:  Colleen F Hanrahan; Bareng A S Nonyane; Lesego Mmolawa; Nora S West; Tsundzukani Siwelana; Limakatso Lebina; Neil Martinson; David W Dowdy
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Lipoarabinomannan in sputum to detect bacterial load and treatment response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: Analytic validation and evaluation in two cohorts.

Authors:  Masanori Kawasaki; Carmenchu Echiverri; Lawrence Raymond; Elizabeth Cadena; Evelyn Reside; Maria Tarcela Gler; Tetsuya Oda; Ryuta Ito; Ryo Higashiyama; Kiyonori Katsuragi; Yongge Liu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Host-response-based gene signatures for tuberculosis diagnosis: A systematic comparison of 16 signatures.

Authors:  Hayley Warsinske; Rohit Vashisht; Purvesh Khatri
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Risk score for predicting mortality including urine lipoarabinomannan detection in hospital inpatients with HIV-associated tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa: Derivation and external validation cohort study.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta-Wright; Elizabeth L Corbett; Douglas Wilson; Joep J van Oosterhout; Keertan Dheda; Helena Huerga; Jonny Peter; Maryline Bonnet; Melanie Alufandika-Moyo; Daniel Grint; Stephen D Lawn; Katherine Fielding
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Alternate aerosol and systemic immunisation with a recombinant viral vector for tuberculosis, MVA85A: A phase I randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas; Iman Satti; Julia L Marshall; Stephanie A Harris; Raquel Lopez Ramon; Ali Hamidi; Alice Minhinnick; Michael Riste; Lisa Stockdale; Alison M Lawrie; Samantha Vermaak; Morven Wilkie; Henry Bettinson; Helen McShane
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Controlling latent TB tuberculosis infection in high-burden countries: A neglected strategy to end TB.

Authors:  Gavin J Churchyard; Sue Swindells
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Gillespie; Angela M Crook; Timothy D McHugh; Carl M Mendel; Sarah K Meredith; Stephen R Murray; Frances Pappas; Patrick P J Phillips; Andrew J Nunn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Validation of Differentially Expressed Immune Biomarkers in Latent and Active Tuberculosis by Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Prem Perumal; Mohamed Bilal Abdullatif; Harriet N Garlant; Isobella Honeyborne; Marc Lipman; Timothy D McHugh; Jo Southern; Ronan Breen; George Santis; Kalaiarasan Ellappan; Saka Vinod Kumar; Harish Belgode; Ibrahim Abubakar; Sanjeev Sinha; Seshadri S Vasan; Noyal Joseph; Karen E Kempsell
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 7.561

2.  Monoclonal antibodies from humans with Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure or latent infection recognize distinct arabinomannan epitopes.

Authors:  Elise Ishida; Devin T Corrigan; Ryan J Malonis; Daniel Hofmann; Tingting Chen; Anita G Amin; Delphi Chatterjee; Maju Joe; Todd L Lowary; Jonathan R Lai; Jacqueline M Achkar
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-10-12

3.  Combination of prealbumin and tuberculosis-specific antigen/phytohemagglutinin ratio for discriminating active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis infection.

Authors:  Ying Luo; Ying Xue; Xu Yuan; Qun Lin; Guoxing Tang; Liyan Mao; Huijuan Song; Feng Wang; Ziyong Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Lymphocyte-Related Immunological Indicators for Stratifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection.

Authors:  Ying Luo; Ying Xue; Guoxing Tang; Yimin Cai; Xu Yuan; Qun Lin; Huijuan Song; Wei Liu; Liyan Mao; Yu Zhou; Zhongju Chen; Yaowu Zhu; Weiyong Liu; Shiji Wu; Feng Wang; Ziyong Sun
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.