BACKGROUND: Early-phase and preclinical studies suggest that moxifloxacin-containing regimens could allow for effective 4-month treatment of uncomplicated, smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to test the noninferiority of two moxifloxacin-containing regimens as compared with a control regimen. One group of patients received isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 8 weeks, followed by 18 weeks of isoniazid and rifampin (control group). In the second group, we replaced ethambutol with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (isoniazid group), and in the third group, we replaced isoniazid with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (ethambutol group). The primary end point was treatment failure or relapse within 18 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 1931 patients who underwent randomization, in the per-protocol analysis, a favorable outcome was reported in fewer patients in the isoniazid group (85%) and the ethambutol group (80%) than in the control group (92%), for a difference favoring the control group of 6.1 percentage points (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 10.5) versus the isoniazid group and 11.4 percentage points (97.5% CI, 6.7 to 16.1) versus the ethambutol group. Results were consistent in the modified intention-to-treat analysis and all sensitivity analyses. The hazard ratios for the time to culture negativity in both solid and liquid mediums for the isoniazid and ethambutol groups, as compared with the control group, ranged from 1.17 to 1.25, indicating a shorter duration, with the lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals exceeding 1.00 in all cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, with events reported in 127 patients (19%) in the isoniazid group, 111 (17%) in the ethambutol group, and 123 (19%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The two moxifloxacin-containing regimens produced a more rapid initial decline in bacterial load, as compared with the control group. However, noninferiority for these regimens was not shown, which indicates that shortening treatment to 4 months was not effective in this setting. (Funded by the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development and others; REMoxTB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00864383.).
BACKGROUND: Early-phase and preclinical studies suggest that moxifloxacin-containing regimens could allow for effective 4-month treatment of uncomplicated, smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to test the noninferiority of two moxifloxacin-containing regimens as compared with a control regimen. One group of patients received isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol for 8 weeks, followed by 18 weeks of isoniazid and rifampin (control group). In the second group, we replaced ethambutol with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (isoniazid group), and in the third group, we replaced isoniazid with moxifloxacin for 17 weeks, followed by 9 weeks of placebo (ethambutol group). The primary end point was treatment failure or relapse within 18 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 1931 patients who underwent randomization, in the per-protocol analysis, a favorable outcome was reported in fewer patients in the isoniazid group (85%) and the ethambutol group (80%) than in the control group (92%), for a difference favoring the control group of 6.1 percentage points (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 10.5) versus the isoniazid group and 11.4 percentage points (97.5% CI, 6.7 to 16.1) versus the ethambutol group. Results were consistent in the modified intention-to-treat analysis and all sensitivity analyses. The hazard ratios for the time to culture negativity in both solid and liquid mediums for the isoniazid and ethambutol groups, as compared with the control group, ranged from 1.17 to 1.25, indicating a shorter duration, with the lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals exceeding 1.00 in all cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, with events reported in 127 patients (19%) in the isoniazid group, 111 (17%) in the ethambutol group, and 123 (19%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The two moxifloxacin-containing regimens produced a more rapid initial decline in bacterial load, as compared with the control group. However, noninferiority for these regimens was not shown, which indicates that shortening treatment to 4 months was not effective in this setting. (Funded by the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development and others; REMoxTB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00864383.).
Authors: Andreas H Diacon; Rodney Dawson; Florian von Groote-Bidlingmaier; Gregory Symons; Amour Venter; Peter R Donald; Christo van Niekerk; Daniel Everitt; Helen Winter; Piet Becker; Carl M Mendel; Melvin K Spigelman Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D Falzon; E Jaramillo; H J Schünemann; M Arentz; M Bauer; J Bayona; L Blanc; J A Caminero; C L Daley; C Duncombe; C Fitzpatrick; A Gebhard; H Getahun; M Henkens; T H Holtz; J Keravec; S Keshavjee; A J Khan; R Kulier; V Leimane; C Lienhardt; C Lu; A Mariandyshev; G B Migliori; F Mirzayev; C D Mitnick; P Nunn; G Nwagboniwe; O Oxlade; D Palmero; P Pavlinac; M I Quelapio; M C Raviglione; M L Rich; S Royce; S Rüsch-Gerdes; A Salakaia; R Sarin; D Sculier; F Varaine; M Vitoria; J L Walson; F Wares; K Weyer; R A White; M Zignol Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Susan E Dorman; John L Johnson; Stefan Goldberg; Grace Muzanye; Nesri Padayatchi; Lorna Bozeman; Charles M Heilig; John Bernardo; Shurjeel Choudhri; Jacques H Grosset; Elizabeth Guy; Priya Guyadeen; Maria Corazon Leus; Gina Maltas; Dick Menzies; Eric L Nuermberger; Margarita Villarino; Andrew Vernon; Richard E Chaisson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Carolina de Miranda Silva; Amirhossein Hajihosseini; Jenny Myrick; Jocelyn Nole; Arnold Louie; Stephan Schmidt; George L Drusano Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Danfeng Zhang; James E Gomez; Jung-Yien Chien; Nathan Haseley; Christopher A Desjardins; Ashlee M Earl; Po-Ren Hsueh; Deborah T Hung Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nicholas D Walter; Gregory M Dolganov; Benjamin J Garcia; William Worodria; Alfred Andama; Emmanuel Musisi; Irene Ayakaka; Tran T Van; Martin I Voskuil; Bouke C de Jong; Rebecca M Davidson; Tasha E Fingerlin; Katerina Kechris; Claire Palmer; Payam Nahid; Charles L Daley; Mark Geraci; Laurence Huang; Adithya Cattamanchi; Michael Strong; Gary K Schoolnik; John Lucian Davis Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Si-Yang Li; Scott M Irwin; Paul J Converse; Khisi E Mdluli; Anne J Lenaerts; Eric L Nuermberger Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Susan E Dorman; Radojka M Savic; Stefan Goldberg; Jason E Stout; Neil Schluger; Grace Muzanyi; John L Johnson; Payam Nahid; Emily J Hecker; Charles M Heilig; Lorna Bozeman; Pei-Jean I Feng; Ruth N Moro; William MacKenzie; Kelly E Dooley; Eric L Nuermberger; Andrew Vernon; Marc Weiner Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405