| Literature DB >> 31037212 |
Benjamin M Anderson1,2, Kevin R Thiele1, Pauline F Grierson1, Siegfried L Krauss1,2, Paul G Nevill1,3, Ian D Small4, Xiao Zhong4, Matthew D Barrett1,2.
Abstract
The Australian arid zone (AAZ) has undergone aridification and the formation of vast sandy deserts since the mid-Miocene. Studies on AAZ organisms, particularly animals, have shown patterns of mesic ancestry, persistence in rocky refugia and range expansions in arid lineages. There has been limited molecular investigation of plants in the AAZ, particularly of taxa that arrived in Australia after the onset of aridification. Here we investigate populations of the widespread AAZ grass Triodia basedowii to determine whether there is evidence for a recent range expansion, and if so, its source and direction. We also undertake a dating analysis for the species complex to which T. basedowii belongs, in order to place its diversification in relation to changes in AAZ climate and landscapes. We analyse a genomic single nucleotide polymorphism data set from 17 populations of T. basedowii in a recently developed approach for detecting the signal and likely origin of a range expansion. We also use alignments from existing and newly sequenced plastomes from across Poaceae for analysis in BEAST to construct fossil-calibrated phylogenies. Across a range of sampling parameters and outgroups, we detected a consistent signal of westward expansion for T. basedowii, originating in central or eastern Australia. Divergence time estimation indicates that Triodia began to diversify in the late Miocene (crown 7.0-8.8 million years (Ma)), and the T. basedowii complex began to radiate during the Pleistocene (crown 1.4-2.0 Ma). This evidence for range expansion in an arid-adapted plant is consistent with similar patterns in AAZ animals and likely reflects a general response to the opening of new habitat during aridification. Radiation of the T. basedowii complex through the Pleistocene has been associated with preferences for different substrates, providing an explanation why only one lineage is widespread across sandy deserts.Entities:
Keywords: Arid zone; Australia; Poaceae; SNPs; Triodia basedowii species complex; biogeography; chloroplast; divergence dating; genotyping-by-sequencing; range expansion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31037212 PMCID: PMC6481909 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plz017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Some of the results of range expansion analyses for Triodia basedowii using different genomic SNP subsets. Ancestral states of SNPs were determined using T. birriliburu (A, B), T. nana (C) or T. glabra (D) as outgroups. Loci sets were assembled (A, C), unassembled (D) or a combination of the two (B). SNPs were chosen randomly (A, D) or with a bias towards SNPs with multiple copies of the rare allele (B, C). Population sampling was one per population (A), one per population excluding tetraploids (D), all samples (C) and all samples excluding tetraploids (B). Panels show heat maps and probable locations of the origin of range expansion (purple ‘X’). Populations are indicated with circles, where darker shades show higher heterozygosity.
Figure 2.Principal components analysis (PCoA) of genomic SNPs from individual plants of Triodia basedowii. Population localities are shown on the map with symbols reflecting their grouping in the PCoA.
Node ages (Ma) from analysis of data set 1 compared to previous molecular dating of the grasses. Node ages from Prasad are with placement of the phytoliths at stem Oryzeae (their H1), while those from Christin are based on their BEAST analysis of chloroplast data from across angiosperms, which included the placement of the phytoliths at stem Oryzeae. HPD is the highest posterior density interval.
| Study | Current study |
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node | Age | 95 % HPD | Age | 95 % HPD | Age | 95 % HPD | Age | 95 % HPD |
| Crown Poaceae | 123 | 119–125 | 121 | 95.9–149 | 88.5 | 80.9–97.8 | 106 | 99.5–110 |
| Crown BOP + PACMAD | 82.4 | 78.5–86.5 | 81.6 | 69.6–93.8 | 74.5 | 70.3–80 | 85.7 | 75.7–97.6 |
| Crown Oryzoideae | 65.6 | 65–66.6 | 67.1 | 56.9–77 | 68 | 67–70.8 | 72.9 | 66–87.9 |
| Crown Bambusoideae | 50 | 40.9–59 | 47.4 | 36.5–59.7 | 34.2 | 19.8–56.2 | 41.5 | 2.9–63.8 |
| Crown Pooideae | 60.1 | 55.1–65.2 | 57.8 | 48.2–67.6 | 59.9 | 51.4–68.5 | 62.9 | 50.1–75.7 |
| Crown Chloridoideae | 41.7 | 38.1–45.7 | 33.6 | 24.5–42.5 | 41.2 | 33.2–49 | 37.3 | 22.6–52.7 |
Node ages (Ma) from analyses of data set 2. Node ages from Toon are shown for comparison. HPD is the highest posterior density interval, RLC is a random local clocks model and UCLN is an uncorrelated log-normal clock model.
| Node | Stem | Crown | Crown | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | Age | 95 % HPD | Age | 95 % HPD | Age | 95 % HPD |
| RLC | 20.2 | 18.4–22.2 | 7.89 | 6.98–8.82 | 2.29 | 1.91–2.70 |
| UCLN | 18.1 | 15.9–20.5 | 5.62 | 4.86–6.39 | 1.58 | 1.29–1.87 |
|
| 19.8 | 11.9–28.0 | 10.4 | 5.50–17.2 | 3.8 | 1.29–7.36 |
|
| 20.9 | 17.9–23.5 | 14.7 | 11.4–18.3 | 4.58 | 2.60–6.86 |
Figure 3.Chronogram from the BEAST analysis of data set 2, comprising chloroplast alignments with a focus on Chloridoideae and Triodia, with two outgroup samples from Danthonioideae. The secondary calibration from the analysis of data set 1 is indicated by the ‘S’ in a black triangle. Node bars for selected nodes of interest are 95 % highest posterior density intervals. Node support values are posterior probabilities and are shown for values <1.00. The Triodia basedowii complex is shaded at the top right.
Figure 4.Current distributions of taxa in the Triodia basedowii complex, with phylogenetic relationships superimposed. Two putative refugia, the Pilbara and the Central Ranges, are labelled and denoted with dotted lines. Taxa are denoted by letters, where G: T. glabra, M: T. mallota, L: T. lanigera, C: T. chichesterensis, V: T. vanleeuwenii, S: T. scintillans, Bi: T. birriliburu, N: T. nana and Ba: T. basedowii.