| Literature DB >> 31037142 |
Bixing Zhao1,2, Yingchao Wang1,2, Xionghong Tan1,3, Xiaoyuan Zheng1,2, Fei Wang1,2, Kun Ke1,4,2, Cuilin Zhang1,2, Naishun Liao1,2, Yuan Dang5, Yingjun Shi1,2, Youshi Zheng1,2, Yunzhen Gao1,2, Qin Li1, Xiaolong Liu1,2, Jingfeng Liu1,4,2.
Abstract
Rationale: T-cell based immunotherapy increasingly shows broad application prospects in cancer treatment, but its performance in solid tumors is far from our expectation, partly due to the re-inhibition of infiltrated T cells by immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Here we presented an artificial synthetic optogenetic circuit to control the immune responses of engineered T cells on demand for promoting and enhancing the therapeutic efficiency of cancer immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: engineered T cells; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune cell therapy; optogenetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31037142 PMCID: PMC6485282 DOI: 10.7150/thno.27051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Melanopsin mediated optogenetic-transduction cascade. A) Scheme of the photoactivatable gene expression system. In dark, melanopsin keeps inactive; upon blue light illumination, retinal undergoes an all-trans to 13-cis photoisomerization, and changes the conformation of melanopsin; then, melanopsin triggers calcium influx via activation of transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs). Calcium influx further triggers the NFAT pathway via the calcium sensor protein calmodulin. Calmodulin subsequently activates calcineurin, which dephosphorylates NFAT, then results in nuclear translocation of NFAT and enables its binding to specific promoters (pNFAT), finally cooperates with resident transcription factors to induce transgene expression. B) Schematic vectors for optogenetic triggered gene expression.
Figure 2Melonopsin-mediated photoactivatable Ca A) Subcellular localization of Flag-OPN4 in 293T cells. Flag-OPN4 or pCDH control vectors were transfected into 293T cells. Cells were immune-stained for detecting OPN4 by Flag antibody followed by Alexa fluor 546 conjugated secondary antibody. Stained cells were visualized with by confocal microscope. B) Blue light induced Ca2+ influx monitored by Ca2+ indicator GCaMP6s. Engineered 293T cells with constitutive melanopsin expression were transfected with GCaMP6s vector. After transfection, intracellular Ca2+ concentration change was monitored by confocal microscope following blue light stimulation. The fluorescence intensity change was plotted on the right and quantified as post-stimulus change in fluorescence intensity divided by the baseline intensity (ΔF/F0); n=6 cells, and the Error bars denote SEM. C) Blue-light induce dephosphorylation of NFAT. The engineered 293T cells were analyzed by western blot for NFAT1 dephosphorylation after blue light stimulation. Ionomycin and PMA stimulation was shown as a positive control. D) Light-induced translocation of mCherry-NFAT1. OPN4 stable expression HeLa cells were transient transfected with mCherry-NFAT1. After transfection, the cells were exposed to repeated light-dark cycles (60 s ON and 60 s OFF). Representative snapshots of cells during mCherry-NFAT1 nuclear translocation were imaged by confocal microscope. The corresponding time courses of NFAT nuclear translocation were plotted on the right. n = 5 cells from three independent experiments. The data were analyzed using two-tailed Student's T-test in (B,D).
Figure 3Light-triggered Ca A) Scheme of light activated Ca2+-dependent gene expression. B) Light-triggered Ca2+-dependent luciferase activity. OPN4+ 293T Cells were transfected with pNFAT-Luc, and the cells were either kept in the dark or exposed to pulsed blue light (0.5 mW/cm2, 60 s on with 60 s interval) for 24 h prior to cell lysis to quantify luciferase activity. C) Light induced expression of mCherry. OPN4+/GFP+ 293T cells were transfected with pNFAT-mCherry, and illuminated with blue light for 24 h, the expression of mCherry and GFP were monitored by fluorescence microscope. D) Schematic view of experimental design of light induced cytokines production. E-F) Light triggered cytokine expression both in mRNA (E) and protein (F) levels. The engineered 293T cells were exposed to blue light stimulation for 24 h, then lysed for qPCR analysis (E) or the culture supernatant was collected for ELISA analysis (F). All data were shown as mean ± s.d. from three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. The data were analyzed using two-tailed Student's T-test in (B, E, F).
Figure 4Light-triggered engineered T cell activation, expansion and tumor killing. A) Schematic view of the experimental design. B) Subcellular localization of Flag-OPN4 in PAN T cells. Flag-OPN4 or pCDH control vectors were transduced into PAN T cells. Cells were immuno-stained for detecting OPN4 by Flag antibody followed by Alexa fluor 546 conjugated secondary antibody. Stained cells were visualized by confocal microscope. C) Light triggered cytokine expression at mRNA level. OPN4+ PAN T Cells were transfected with pNFAT-3CK, and the cells were either kept in the dark or exposed to pulsed blue light (0.5 mW/cm2, 60 s on with 60 s interval) for 24 h prior to cell lysis to quantify the cytokine expression at mRNA level. D) Light triggered cytokine expression at protein level. The operation is similar to (C), while the difference is that both light stimulated and dark cells were supplemented with Golgi Stop TM Protein Transport Inhibitor after pulsed blue light illumination for 24 h; afterwards, continue incubating the cells for another 10 h in the presence of pulsed blue light illumination prior to cell fixation and permeabilization. The cells were stained by anti-IL2 (APC conjugated), anti-IL15 (PerCP conjugated) and anti-TNF-α (Alexa 488 conjugated). E) Evaluation of the expansion ability of engineered T cells. The cellular expansion was assessed by flow cytometry of CFSE-stained engineering PAN T cells. F) Cytolytic activity assay of engineered T cells activated by blue light. Engineered T cells and nano-luciferase modified target cells were co-cultured at ratio of 10:1 for 24 h, then either kept in dark or exposed to pulsed blue light; the cells transduced with empty vector were used as negative control. All data were shown as mean ± s.d. from three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. The data were analyzed using two-tailed Student's T-test in (C, F).
Figure 5A) The experimental design and therapeutic schedule. B) B-NDG mice (8 weeks, n=5) bearing Sk-HEP-1 (nano-Luc+) orthotopic tumor were intra-tumorally injected with 5×106 engineered T cells on the day 1 and 7, respectively. After the first treatment, mice received pulsed blue light illumination (0.5 mW/cm2, 12 h everyday) in the experimental group (from day 1 to day 14). Mice in the other two groups were feed normally. Growth curves of SK-HEP-1 (nano-Luc+) xenograft mice treated either with PBS or engineered T cells in the presence or absence of pulsed blue light illumination. C) Bioluminescent imaging of mice was photographed (upper panel) and the bioluminescent intensities of mice in three groups were assessed (under panel) per week (day 3, day 9 and day 16). D) Cytokines produced by light-triggered engineered T cells were measured in mouse sera post the second T-cell transfer therapy. Data was shown as meansd. E) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of tumor bearing mice treat with saline (green line), engineered T cells without blue light illumination (black line), and engineered T cells plus blue light illumination (blue line). F) Representative photographs of H&E staining and CD3-positive cells (T cells) in tumor tissues. G) Analysis of cell proliferation (Ki-67) and apoptosis (TUNEL) in tumor tissues. The data were analyzed using two-tailed Student's T-test in (B, C, D).