Literature DB >> 31036585

Volumetric parameters-based differentiation of narrow angle from open angle and classification of angle configurations: an SS-OCT study.

Fei Li1, Rouxi Zhou1, Kai Gao1, Ling Jin1, Xiulan Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of volumetric parameters to differentiate narrow angle from open angle and distinguish different configurations of narrow angle.
METHODS: The current study was composed of two parts. In the first part, with gonioscopy as reference standard, we tested power of each parameter to differentiate narrow angle from open angle. In the second part, we evaluated the efficacy of different parameters to distinguish angle configurations which were subclassified into type 1 (pupillary block) and type 2 (non-pupillary block and multiple mechanisms) based on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images.
RESULTS: In part 1, the training set was composed of 117 narrow-angle eyes and 60 open-angle eyes, and the validation set included 38 narrow-angle eyes and 37 open-angle eyes. Anterior chamber volume (ACV) outperformed all the other parameters with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.988. The sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off value 98.1 mm3 in the validation set were 90.0% and 97.1%, respectively. In part 2, training set was composed of 96 eyes of 88 patients with primary angle-closure disease, with 49 diagnosed as type 1 and 47 as type 2 configuration. 32 eyes were used for validation. A model comprised of iris volume (IV), iris thickness (IT) 2000 µm from the scleral spur and angle open distance (AOD) 750 µm from the scleral spur was found to have an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI, 0.695 to 0.870). Sensitivity and specificity of the model were 82.6% and 77.8% respectively in the validation set.
CONCLUSIONS: With ACV, we can detect patients with narrow angle from open angle faster and more easily than AOD and anterior chamber depth. Then, for patients with narrow angle, the combination of IV, IT and AOD750 measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography could further classify configurations of angle closure compared with UBM. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior chamber; glaucoma; swept-source OCT

Year:  2019        PMID: 31036585     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  5 in total

1.  Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Anish Jindal; Irene Ctori; Gianni Virgili; Ersilia Lucenteforte; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 2.  Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Eleonora Micheletti; Francesco Oddone; Carlo Bruttini; Silvia Montescani; Giovanni De Angelis; Luigi Rovati; Robert N Weinreb; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Segmentation Errors in the Measurement of Volumetric Parameters by Swept-Source Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Hailiu Chen; Jie Meng; Peng Lu; Dan Ye; Yunxuan Li; Lu Cheng; Yangyunhui Li; Xiaoling Liang; Wenyong Huang; Jingjing Huang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT vs gonioscopy for detecting angle closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Desmond; Vincent Tran; Monish Maharaj; Nicole Carnt; Andrew White
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of the Selected Eye's Anterior Segment Parameters.

Authors:  Michał Dembski; Anna Nowińska; Klaudia Ulfik-Dembska; Edward Wylęgała
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.