| Literature DB >> 31036013 |
Di Sun1,2,3, Mingshu Wang1,2,3, Xingjian Wen1,2,3, Sai Mao1,2,3, Anchun Cheng4,5,6, Renyong Jia1,2,3, Qiao Yang1,2,3, Ying Wu1,2,3, Dekang Zhu2,3, Shun Chen1,2,3, Mafeng Liu1,2,3, Xinxin Zhao1,2,3, Shaqiu Zhang1,2,3, Xiaoyue Chen2,3, Yunya Liu1,2,3, Yanling Yu1,2,3, Ling Zhang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The picornaviral 3C protease mediates viral polyprotein maturation and multiple cleavages of host proteins to modulate viral translation and transcription. The 3C protease has been regarded as a valid target due to its structural similarity among different picornaviruses and minimal sequence similarity with host proteins; therefore, the development of potent inhibitors against the 3C protease as an antiviral drug is ongoing. Duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV) belongs to the Picornavidea family and is a major threat to the poultry industry. To date, little is known about the roles of the DHAV 3C protease plays during infection.Entities:
Keywords: 3C protease; DHAV; Localization; Protease activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31036013 PMCID: PMC6489322 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-019-1155-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Predicted protease cleavage sites of the DHAV polyprotein
| Protein | aa position | Length | Cleavage site | GC content | Cleavage type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1AB/VP0 | 1–256 | 256 aa | PFDN | 40% | 3Cpro |
| 1C/VP3 | 257–493 | 237 aa | ATNN | 43.33% | 3Cpro |
| 1D/VP1 | 494–731 | 238 aa | DLEI | 33.33% | 3Cpro |
| 2A1 | 732–751 | 20 aa | EPNP | 46.47% | ribosome skipping site |
| 2A2 | 752–912 | 161 aa | PEFV | 43.33% | 3Cpro |
| 2A3 | 913–1036 | 124 aa | ITTD | 36.67% | 3Cpro |
| 2B | 1037–1155 | 119 aa | MLED | 43.33% | 3Cpro |
| 2C | 1156–1488 | 333 aa | SFMN | 46.67% | 3Cpro |
| 3A | 1489–1581 | 93 aa | RRFA | 40% | 3Cpro |
| 3B | 1582–1613 | 32 aa | TGLD | 53.33% | 3Cpro |
| 3C | 1614–1794 | 181 aa | PVFN | 40% | 3Cpro |
| 3D | 1795–2247 | 453 aa |
Primers used in this study
| Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| pET32a-3C-F | CATATGATGCACCATCATCATCATCATAGCGGGCGGGTGAATTTCAGACATA |
| pET32a-3C-R | AAGCTTTTATTGATTAAAAACTGGAAAGACCCTA |
| 3C-H48A-R | GTAAATTTAGACGCCCCAAATGTCA |
| 3C-H48A-F | TTTGGGGCGTCTAAATTTACACAAT |
| 3C-C144A-R | CAAGCACACCACCCGCGGAGCCAGG |
| 3C-C144A-F | GGCTCCGCGGGTGGTGTGCTTGTAG |
| EGFP-3C-F | GAATTCTTATGAGCGGGCGGGTGAATTTCAGACATA |
| EGFP-3C-R | GGATCCGGTTGATTAAAAACTGGAAAGACCCTA |
Fig. 1Multiple sequence alignment of 3C proteases from various picornaviruses. a Alignment of DHAV and several other picornavirus amino acid sequences corresponding to the 3C protease. Invariant residues in the 3C protease are highlighted with a black background. The catalytic triad of the 3C protease is indicated with black arrows. The GxCG motif was conserved within these sequences, which may be part of the active site. b Phylogenic tree of the 3C proteases. The tree contains 80 sequences that correspond to 3C protein sequences from different single-stranded RNA viruses. Phylogenetic analysis was predicted with the maximum likelihood method. The background colors indicate that these 3C proteases were divided into six groups. The stability of the nodes was assessed with 1000 bootstrap replications, and bootstrap values above 0.5 were shown at the blue circles. The width of the blue circles represents the bootstrap value (range from 0.5 to 1)
Fig. 2Optimization of 3C protease expression. The DHAV 3C protease was expressed at different (a) IPTG concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 mM), (b) temperatures (16, 30, and 37 °C), and (c) induction times (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h). (d) The bacterial lysates were analyzed for the presence of the DHAV 3C protease by immunoblotting
Fig. 3Analysis of the DHAV 3C protease activities under different conditions. Different (a) pH values of the reaction buffer (b) NaCl concentrations, and (c) temperatures
Fig. 4In vitro cleavage activity of the DHAV 3C protease. The cleavage reactions were performed with different concentrations of substrate. The enzymatic activity of the DHAV 3C protease was determined by incubation with (a) 10 μM, (b) 100 μM, (c) 150 μM, (d) 200 μM, (e) 250 μM, and (f) 300 μM substrate. All reactions were determined in triplicate and kinetic parameters were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5
Verification of the quality of the DHAV 3C protease assay
| Groups | Positive control(RFU) | Negative control(RFU) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.13361 | 1.07516 | 1.10534 | 1.10119 | 1.1402 | 0.762227 | 0.771233 | 0.784233 | 0.768465 | 0.758724 | |
| 1.15738 | 1.12715 | 1.12948 | 1.19831 | 1.16908 | 0.761726 | 0.756805 | 0.790555 | 0.76855 | 0.787662 | |
| 1.15696 | 1.1326 | 1.1074 | 1.11176 | 1.10993 | 0.803665 | 0.781323 | 0.723668 | 0.730139 | 0.76157 | |
| 1.14759 | 1.10938 | 1.18726 | 1.08608 | 1.15501 | 0.778026 | 0.769972 | 0.759402 | 0.787904 | 0.761854 | |
| 1.16827 | 1.12148 | 1.13185 | 1.17731 | 1.17182 | 0.801926 | 0.761074 | 0.781497 | 0.773718 | 0.789218 | |
| 1.13096 | 1.1281 | 1.13514 | 1.08354 | 1.13621 | 0.768665 | 0.807697 | 0.783409 | 0.767121 | 0.790188 | |
| 1.08841 | 1.07616 | 1.09364 | 1.11114 | 1.16378 | 0.808201 | 0.798066 | 0.743026 | 0.783449 | 0.777292 | |
| 1.08488 | 1.10212 | 1.07085 | 1.10964 | 1.1517 | 0.796996 | 0.757244 | 0.738131 | 0.750857 | 0.801263 | |
| 1.10932 | 1.09149 | 1.07908 | 1.1113 | 1.1919 | 0.790674 | 0.740505 | 0.739626 | 0.793552 | 0.803685 | |
| 1.12598 | 1.11202 | 1.17914 | 1.13739 | 1.12435 | 0.780591 | 0.783838 | 0.751539 | 0.771849 | 0.77443 | |
| 1.1377 | 1.1661 | 1.09319 | 1.12165 | 1.08546 | 0.793924 | 0.779322 | 0.796491 | 0.79664 | 0.744124 | |
| 1.10536 | 1.15526 | 1.08509 | 1.11033 | 1.18799 | 0.777503 | 0.788694 | 0.790449 | 0.758279 | 0.775953 | |
| Mean | 1.128868333 | 0.785343667 | ||||||||
| SD | 0.026020629 | 0.015488917 | ||||||||
Fig. 5The inhibition of AG7088 against the DHAV 3C protease. (a) The Z-factor assays of the DHAV 3C protease. The Z-factor assays were performed with positive groups (n = 60) containing 5 μM substrate and 5 μM DHAV 3C protease and negative groups (n = 60) consisting of 5 μM substrate and reaction buffer. (b) The inhibition assay was performed with samples containing 5 μM DHAV 3C protease, 20 μM substrate and two concentrations (50 μM and 100 μM) of the AG7088 in cleavage buffer
Fig. 6Localization of the 3C protease in DEF cells infected with DHAV. DEF cells were infected with DHAV and collected at various times postinfection. The samples from each time point were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with DAPI for DNA (blue) and 3C antibody (green) as indicated
Fig. 7The 3C protease and variants were expressed in DEF cells. a DEF cells were transfected with pEGFP-3C, pEGFP-3C-H38A, pEGFP-3C-C144A, and pEGFP-N1 for 24 h. DEF cells were then stained with DAPI for DNA (blue) and 3C antibody (red) as indicated. b DEF cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-myc-His (−) A-3C and pcDNA3.1-myc-His (−) A for 24 h. Then DEF cells were stained with DAPI for DNA (blue) and 3C antibody (green) as indicated