| Literature DB >> 31035694 |
Simona Codruta Heghes1, Oliviu Vostinaru2, Lucia Maria Rus3, Cristina Mogosan4, Cristina Adela Iuga5,6, Lorena Filip7.
Abstract
The antispasmodic effect of drugs is used for the symptomatic treatment of cramping and discomfort affecting smooth muscles from the gastrointestinal, billiary or genitourinary tract in a variety of clinical situations.The existing synthetic antispasmodic drugs may cause a series of unpleasant side effects, and therefore the discovery of new molecules of natural origin is an important goal for the pharmaceutical industry. This review describes a series of recent studies investigating the antispasmodic effect of essential oils from 39 plant species belonging to 12 families. The pharmacological models used in the studies together with the mechanistic discussions and the chemical composition of the essential oils are also detailed. The data clearly demonstrate the antispasmodic effect of the essential oils from the aromatic plant species studied. Further research is needed in order to ascertain the therapeutic importance of these findings.Entities:
Keywords: antispasmodic effect; aromatic plants; essential oils; isolated ileum; monoterpenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035694 PMCID: PMC6539827 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24091675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Plant species containing essential oils with antispasmodic activity demonstrated in preclinical studies.
| No. | Plant Species with Essential Oils | Experimental Model/Concentration of EO in Organ Bath | Mechanism of Antispasmodic Effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacardiaceae | ||||
| 1. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/50 μg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Shirole et al., 2015 [ | |
| Annonaceae | ||||
| 2. | Isolated rat bladder/0.05 mL/20 mL; white rabbit bladder in vivo/0.01–0.05 mL/rabbit ∗ | Increase of cAMP | Kim et al., 2003 [ | |
| 3. |
| Isolated guinea pig ileum/3–729 μg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+channels; antagonism of histaminergic receptors | Souza et al., 2015 [ |
| 4. |
| Isolated guinea pig ileum; isolated rat uterus/243–729 μg/mL | Decrease in cytosolic calcium concentration | Correia et al., 2015 [ |
| Apiaceae | ||||
| 5. | Isolated rat ileum/0.5–2 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Gharib Naseri et al., 2007 [ | |
| 6. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/2.20–6.63 mg/mL; | Not available | Heinle et al., 2006 [ | |
| 7. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/ | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Jabeen at al., 2009 [ | |
| 8. | Isolated rat ileum/ | Not available | Pavlovic et al., 2012 [ | |
| 9. | Isolated rat uterus/10–40 mg/mL | Not available | Ostad et al., 2001 [ | |
| 10. | Isolated rat anococcygeus muscle/5–50 μg/mL | Activation of NO-cGMP pathway | Tirapelli et al., 2007 [ | |
| Araceae | ||||
| 11. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/ | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Gilani et al., 2006 [ | |
| Asteraceae | ||||
| 12. | Isolated sheep ruminal and abomasal smooth muscles/0.1–100 μg/mL | Not available | Jalilzadeh-Amin et al., 2012 [ | |
| 13. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/60 μg/mL | Direct smooth muscle relaxation | Sandor et al., 2018 [ | |
| 14. | Isolated rabbit ileum/30 μg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels; increase of cAMP | Zavala-Mendoza et al., 2016 [ | |
| 15. |
| Gastrointestinal transit test in mouse (in vivo)/316 mg/kg ∗ | Not available | Perez-Vasquez et al., 2017 [ |
| 16. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/0.3–3 mg/mL | K+ channels activation | Mehmood et al., 2015 [ | |
| Geraniaceae | ||||
| 17. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/ 4.8–6 μg/mL | Reduction of calcium flux into the intestinal smooth muscles | Lis-Balchin et al., 1997 [ | |
| Lamiaceae | ||||
| 18. | Isolated guinea pig ileum, isolated rat uterus/6 μg/mL | Increase of cAMP | Lis-Balchin and Hart, 1999 [ | |
| 19. | Isolated rat ileum/20 μg/mL; isolated mouse jejunum/1–50 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels; Not available | Sadraei et al., 2003 [ | |
| 20. | Isolated guinea pig ileum; isolated rat ileum/10–320 μL/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels; Inhibition of 5HT3 receptor channels | Grigoleit et al., 2005 [ | |
| 21. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/0.1 nM–10 μM | Inhibition of Ca2+channels | Souza et al., 2013 [ | |
| 22. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/0.9 μM–2.5 μM | Not available | De Sousa et al., 2008 [ | |
| 23. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/3–10 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Janbaz et al., 2014 [ | |
| 24. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/250 μg/mL–1 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Souza et al., 2015 [ | |
| 25. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/0.1–1000 μg/mL | Not available | Madeira et al., 2002 [ | |
| 26. | Isolated rabbit jejunum, isolated rat jejunum/0.01–0.3 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Makrane et al., 2018 [ | |
| 27. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/1–300 μg/mL | Direct smooth muscle relaxation | Camara et al., 2003 [ | |
| 28. | Isolated guinea pig ileum/150–1200 μg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Ventura-Martinez et al., 2011 [ | |
| 29. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/0.1–3 mg/mL | K+ channels activation | Khan et al., 2011 [ | |
| 30. | Isolated rat ileum/1.55 μg/mL | Not available | Hajhashemi et al., 2000 [ | |
| Poaceae | ||||
| 31. | Isolated rabbit ileum/0.001–1 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Devi et al., 2011 [ | |
| 32. | Isolated rat ileum/30–120 μg/mL | Not available | Pavlovic et al., 2017 [ | |
| 33. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/0.01–3 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Janbaz et al., 2014 [ | |
| Rosaceae | ||||
| 34. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/0.01–1 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Rasheed et al., 2015 [ | |
| Rutaceae | ||||
| 35. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/Not available | Not available | Spadaro et al., 2012 [ | |
| 36. | Isolated rat ileum/9.7–1000 μg/mL | Not available | Sanchez-Recillas et al., 2017 [ | |
| Verbenaceae | ||||
| 37. |
| Isolated rat ileum/7–37 mg/mL | Reduction of calcium influx, stimulation of NO production | Blanco et al., 2013 [ |
| 38. |
| Isolated guinea pig ileum/11.56–48.83 μg/mL | Not available | Menezes et al., 2018 [ |
| Zingiberaceae | ||||
| 39. | Isolated rabbit jejunum/3–10 mg/mL | Inhibition of Ca2+ channels | Gilani et al., 2008 [ |
∗ For the in vivo experimental models dose of essentials oils (EO) was expressed in mL/animal or mg/kg.
Clinical studies evaluating antispasmodic potential of essential oils.
| Area of Interest | Authors | Type of Clinical Study | Number of Patients | Treatment | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional dyspepsia | Papathanasopoulos et al., 2013 [ | Randomized, crossover study | 13 healthy volunteers | Peppermint oil 182 mg p.o., single dose | Decreased intragastric pressure and gastric motility |
| Functional dyspepsia | Inamori et al., 2007 [ | Randomized control study | 10 healthy volunteers | Peppermint oil 0.64 mL p.o., single dose | Enhancement of gastric emptying without altering gastric emptying coefficient |
| Functional dyspepsia | May et al., 2000 [ | Randomized control study | 96 patients with functional dyspepsia | Peppermint oil and caraway oil combination 90 mg + 50 mg p.o., 4 weeks | Reduction of symptoms (pain, fulness, heaviness) |
| Functional dyspepsia | Madisch et al., 1999 [ | Randomized control study | 118 patients with functional dyspepsia | Peppermint oil and caraway oil combination 90 mg + 50 mg p.o., 4 weeks | Reduction of dyspeptic symptoms |
| Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) | Cash et al., 2016 [ | Randomized control study | 72 patients with IBS | Peppermint oil 180 mg p.o., 4 weeks | Reduction of symptoms |
| IBS | Khanna et al., 2014 [ | Meta-analysis | 9 studies with 726 patients with IBS | Peppermint oil 200 mg | Global improvement of IBS symptoms (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.78–2.81) |
| IBS | Merat et al., 2010 [ | Randomized control study | 90 patients with IBS | Peppermint oil 187 mg p.o., 8 weeks | Reduction of abdominal pain and discomfort |
| IBS | Cappello et al., 2007 [ | Randomized control study | 57 patients with IBS | Peppermint oil | Reduction of total IBS symptoms |
| IBS | Pittler and Ernst 1998 [ | Meta-analysis | 8 randomized control studies | Peppermint oil | Reduction of IBS symptoms not established beyond reasonable doubt |
| IBS | Liu et al., 1997 [ | Randomized control study | 110 patients with IBS | Peppermint oil 187 mg p.o., 4 weeks | Improvement of pain and other IBS symptoms |
| Endoscopic procedures | Inoue et al., 2014 [ | Randomized control study | 226 patients with colonoscopy | L-menthol applied on the mucosa | Reduction of discomfort |
| Endoscopic procedures | Hiki et al., 2012 [ | Randomized control study | 131 patients with gastric endoscopy | L-menthol applied on the mucosa | Reduction of peristalsis |
| Endoscopic procedures | Yamamoto et al., 2006 [ | Randomized, control study | 40 patients with endoscopic cholangiopancreatography | Peppermint oil applied to papilla | Non-significant reduction of duodenal contractions |
| Infantile colic | Bezerra Alves et al., 2012 [ | Randomized crossover study | 30 infants | Decreased frequency and duration of infantile colic | |
| Primary dysmenorrhea | Ghodsi and Asltoghiri, 2014 [ | Randomized control study | 80 female students | Fennel capsules 180 mg/day, 3 months | Reduction of dysmenorrhea symptoms |
Figure 1Main mechanisms of antispasmodic effect of essential oils: a. inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels; b. modulation of potassium channels; c. modulation of intracellular cAMP (EO—essential oil, VDCC—voltage-dependent calcium channel; KC—potasium channel, GPCR—G-protein coupled receptors, CaM—calmoduline, PLC—phospholipase C, AC—adenylyl cyclase, MLCK—myosin-light chain kinase, MLCP—myosin-light chain phosphatase, ER—endoplasmic reticulum, cGMP—cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cAMP—cyclic adenosine monophosphate, NO—nitric oxide).
Figure 2Chemical structures of main constituents from antispasmodic essential oils.
Chemical composition of the studied antispasmodic essential oils.
| Plant Species | Part Use | Representative Compounds | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galls | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Flowers | Major components differ significantly depending on the fraction of essential oil, origin of the plant material and harvesting time | [ | |
| Leaves | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Seeds | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Hydrocarbons: | [ | ||
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Rhizomes | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Flowering tops and leaves | Major components differ significantly depending on the origin of the plant material and harvesting time | [ | |
| Flowers | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Leaves | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Major components differ depending on the harvesting time | [ | |
| Flowers | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Flowers | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Major components differ significantly depending on the origin of the plant material | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Major components differ significantly depending on chemotype and the origin of the plant material | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Alcohols: linalool 1.6–3.4%, geraniol 67.6–83.6%, citronellol 1.6–2.1% | [ | |
| [ | |||
| Pericarps | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Pericarps | Hydrocarbons: limonene 87.9–96.8%, ß-myrcene 1.37–2.5%, ß-phellandrene 0–1.5% | [ | |
| Leaves | The plant presents a great morphological and chemical variability with a predominance of monoterpene type compounds such as citral, β-myrcene, limonene and carvone, based on which several chemotyps have been described. | [ | |
| Leaves | Hydrocarbons: | [ | |
| Fruits | Hydrocarbons: | [ |