| Literature DB >> 31035460 |
Changlu Ma1,2, Shuwen Zhang3, Jing Lu4, Cai Zhang5, Xiaoyang Pang6,7, Jiaping Lv8.
Abstract
A total of 85 strains of lactic acid bacteria were isolated from corn silage in this study and analyzed in vitro for their cholesterol removal, NPC1L1 protein down-regulation and bile salt deconjugation ability, respectively. Nineteen strains were selected for further analysis for their probiotic potential. Finally, 3 strains showing better probiotic potential were evaluated for their cholesterol-lowering activity in hamsters. The strains showing the greater cholesterol removal and NPC1L1 protein down-regulation activity had no significant effects on serum and hepatic cholesterol levels in hamsters (p > 0.05). However, Lactobacillus plantarum CAAS 18008 (1 × 109 CFU/d) showing the greater bile salt deconjugation ability significantly reduced serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and hepatic total cholesterol levels by 28.8%, 21.7%, and 30.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). The cholesterol-lowering mechanism was attributed to its bile salt hydrolase activity, which enhanced daily fecal bile acid excretion levels and thereby accelerated new bile acid synthesis from cholesterol in liver. This study demonstrated that the strains showing greater cholesterol removal and NPC1L1 protein down-regulation activity in vitro hardly reveal cholesterol-lowering activity in vivo, whereas the strains showing greater bile salt deconjugation ability in vitro has large potential to decrease serum cholesterol levels in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: NPC1L1 protein; bile salt deconjugation; cholesterol removal; hypocholesterolemic activity; lactic acid bacteria; probiotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31035460 PMCID: PMC6539855 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20092073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Comparison of lactic acid bacterial strains for cholesterol removal ability. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Comparison of lactic acid bacterial strains for NPC1L1 down-regulation ability. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Comparison of lactic acid bacterial strains for bile salt deconjugation ability. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly from each other (p < 0.05).
Acid tolerance, bile tolerance, and adhesion ability of the selected strains.
| Hypothesized Pathway | Strain | Acid Tolerance (%) | Bile Tolerance (%) | Adhesion (Bacterial Counts /100 cells) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater cholesterol removal | 61.6 ± 2.2 b | NG | 282 ± 30 a | |
| 33.6 ± 4.1 f | 83.6 ± 5.5 a | 281 ± 19 a | ||
| 66.3 ± 2.0 ab | 41.5 ± 3.8 h | 251 ± 10 ab | ||
| 65.9 ± 3.7 ab | 81.9 ± 5.6 ab | 228± 34 bc | ||
| 65.2 ± 3.9 ab | 75.8 ± 2.8 bc | 224 ± 23 bc | ||
| 22.5 ± 1.0 h | 54.6 ± 4.1 g | 213± 28 bc | ||
| 55.5 ± 3.2 c | NG | 107 ± 19 e | ||
| 21.7 ± 3.0 h | 76.0 ± 5.1 bc | 241 ± 26 ab | ||
| NPC1L1 protein | 30.8 ± 2.4 fg | 75.5 ± 4.2 bc | 245 ± 27 ab | |
| 49.9 ± 3.8 cd | 54.6 ± 3.6 g | 106 ± 19 e | ||
| 63.4± 2.9 ab | NG | 151 ± 23 d | ||
| 61.2 ± 3.4 b | 65.8 ± 2.3 de | 240 ± 22 abc | ||
| Greater bile salt deconjugation | 61.5 ± 3.4 b | NG | 205 ± 26 bc | |
| 68.5 ± 3.0 a | 75.7 ± 4.2 bc | 241± 14 ab | ||
| 55.5 ± 4.3 c | 80.7 ± 4.7 ab | 93 ± 20 e | ||
| 40.2 ± 3.0 e | 63.5 ± 4.2 ef | 101 ± 24 e | ||
| 27.0 ± 2.6 gh | 71.8 ± 2.9 cd | 207± 29 bc | ||
| 63.9 ± 3.9 ab | 74.8 ± 4.3 bc | 194 ± 34 c | ||
| 45.5 ± 3.3 de | 57.5 ± 1.7 fg | 121 ± 26 de |
a–g Means in the same column not sharing a common superscript letter differed significantly (p < 0.05). A NG sign indicates that the strains did not grow in the presence of 0.3% oxgall.
Figure 4Serum total cholesterol (A), LDL-cholesterol (B) and hepatic total cholesterol (C) levels of the different groups. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Daily excretion levels of fecal total neutral sterols (A) and total bile acids (B) of the different groups. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Small intestinal NPC1L1 protein (A) and hepatic CYP7A1 (B) levels of the different groups. Data are represented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Means not sharing a common letter differ significantly from each other (p < 0.05).