| Literature DB >> 31034512 |
Aurélie Crabbé1, Lisa Ostyn1, Sorien Staelens1, Charlotte Rigauts1, Martijn Risseeuw2, Maarten Dhaenens3, Simon Daled3, Heleen Van Acker1, Dieter Deforce3, Serge Van Calenbergh2, Tom Coenye1.
Abstract
Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial pathogens is typically evaluated using in vitro assays that do not consider the complex host microenvironment. This may help explaining a significant discrepancy between antibiotic efficacy in vitro and in vivo, with some antibiotics being effective in vitro but not in vivo or vice versa. Nevertheless, it is well-known that antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria is driven by environmental factors. Lung epithelial cells enhance the activity of aminoglycoside antibiotics against the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, yet the mechanism behind is unknown. The present study addresses this gap and provides mechanistic understanding on how lung epithelial cells stimulate aminoglycoside activity. To investigate the influence of the local host microenvironment on antibiotic activity, an in vivo-like three-dimensional (3-D) lung epithelial cell model was used. We report that conditioned medium of 3-D lung cells, containing secreted but not cellular components, potentiated the bactericidal activity of aminoglycosides against P. aeruginosa, including resistant clinical isolates, and several other pathogens. In contrast, conditioned medium obtained from the same cell type, but grown as conventional (2-D) monolayers did not influence antibiotic efficacy. We found that 3-D lung cells secreted endogenous metabolites (including succinate and glutamate) that enhanced aminoglycoside activity, and provide evidence that bacterial pyruvate metabolism is linked to the observed potentiation of antimicrobial activity. Biochemical and phenotypic assays indicated that 3-D cell conditioned medium stimulated the proton motive force (PMF), resulting in increased bacterial intracellular pH. The latter stimulated antibiotic uptake, as determined using fluorescently labelled tobramycin in combination with flow cytometry analysis. Our findings reveal a cross-talk between host and bacterial metabolic pathways, that influence downstream activity of antibiotics. Understanding the underlying basis of the discrepancy between the activity of antibiotics in vitro and in vivo may lead to improved diagnostic approaches and pave the way towards novel means to stimulate antibiotic activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31034512 PMCID: PMC6508747 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Fig 2Uptake of BODIPY-tobramycin by P. aeruginosa PAO1 (A, C) and DK2 (B, D) in 3-D CM versus control medium, determined using flow cytometry analysis. Tobramycin uptake was assessed based on the fraction of the population that fell into three respective gates: negative, intermediate and positive. Negative and positive gates were determined respectively using a negative control (untreated sample) and BODIPY-tobramycin concentrations that resulted in maximal fluorescence intensity (S2 Fig). Bacteria whose fluorescence was situated between the positive and negative gates represent the intermediate population. Biofilms were formed for 4h in the presence of 0.75 μg/mL BODIPY-tobramycin. Panels A and B are derived from the dot plot graphs of each replicate (left and middle image) in panels C and D, respectively (forward scatter signal in X-axis, fluorescence intensity in Y-axis). Panels C and D show one representative replicate. The right image of panels C and D present an overlay of the histograms from control and 3-D CM samples, showing the fluorescence intensity on the X-axis and the percentage of the analysed cell population in the Y-axis. Control medium was GTSF-2. ** p < 0.01, n ≥ 3. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Potentiating effect of 3-D CM against biofilm formation of various bacterial species.
Strains for which a potentiating effect of aminoglycosides was observed are highlighted in green, those for which the antibiotic activity was unchanged between 3-D CM and control are labelled in yellow, and the strains for which aminoglycoside activity was inhibited by 3-D CM are coloured in red. The standard error of the mean is indicated.
| Strain | Fold-change antibiotic potentiation (3-D CM / control) | Antibiotic and concentration tested |
|---|---|---|
| 606,0 ± 286,8 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) | |
| 225.9 ± 129.4 | Tobramycin (5 μg/mL) | |
| 79.2 ± 44.8 | Tobramycin (8 μg/mL) | |
| 407.3 ± 123.4 | Tobramycin (8 μg/mL) | |
| 15.5 ± 4.4 | Tobramycin (32 μg/mL) | |
| 2.8 ± 1.6 | Tobramycin (32 μg/mL) | |
| 7.9 ± 4.3 | Tobramycin (0.5 μg/mL) | |
| 386.8 ± 280.1 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) | |
| 7053.5 ± 6681.9 | Tobramycin (256 μg/mL) | |
| 1487.6 ± 898.2 | Tobramycin (192 μg/mL) | |
| 209.8 ± 58.1 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) | |
| 39.6 ± 10.3 | Tobramycin (1 μg/mL) | |
| 286.3 ± 267.6 | Tobramycin (1 μg/mL) | |
| 181.4 ± 95.8 | Tobramycin (0.5 μg/mL) | |
| 94.5 ± 51.8 | Tobramycin (0.5 μg/mL) | |
| 58.8 ± 47.1 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) | |
| 7.8 ± 2.4 | Gentamicin (8 μg/mL) | |
| 5.1 ± 1.3 | Tobramycin (4 μg/mL) | |
| 0.5 ± 0.1 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) | |
| 0.1 ± 0.02 | Gentamicin (256 μg/mL) | |
| 28.5 ± 15.9 | Tobramycin (156 μg/mL) | |
| 0.1 ± 0.07 | Tobramycin (0.5 μg/mL) | |
| 1.0 ± 0.4 | Tobramycin (256 μg/mL) | |
| 1.4 ± 0.4 | Tobramycin (64 μg/mL) | |
| 0.8 ± 0.1 | Tobramycin (2 μg/mL) |
* p ≤ 0.05,
** p < 0.01
Strains used in this study.
| Species | Strain number |
|---|---|
| PAO1 (ATCC 15692) | |
| AA44 [43] | |
| AA2 [ | |
| AA43 [43] | |
| LESB58 [ | |
| LES400 [ | |
| DK2 [ | |
| 1709–12 [ | |
| Mi126 [ | |
| AMT0023-34 [ | |
| Jpn1563 [ | |
| Pr335 [ | |
| KT2440 (ATCC 47054) | |
| ATCC 17400 | |
| LMG 1228 | |
| SP123 [ | |
| LMG 16164 | |
| ATCC 700720 | |
| AB5075 (ATCC 19606) | |
| LMG 14980 | |
| K56-2 (LMG 18863) | |
| ATCC 25922 | |
| LMG 14696 | |
| DSM 20746 | |
| LMG 18984 | |
| PAO1 [ | |
| PAO1 ΔmexXY [ | |
| PAO1 Δ MexAB::FRT [ | |