| Literature DB >> 31031787 |
Cinzia Montemurro1,2, Giovanni Dambruoso1, Giovanna Bottalico1,2, Wilma Sabetta1,2.
Abstract
The morphology of olive flowers allows either self- or cross-pollination that could partially explain the existence of both reproductive features in this species. However, a high degree of self-incompatibility is reported for many olive genotypes, that could be an important reproductive barrier influencing olive yield. Due to the strong environmental influence, results of compatibility tests are often contradictory, making cultivar classification quite imprecise. In this study, the self-incompatibility value has been determined for four olive genotypes (Bella di Spagna, Coratina, Leccino, and Ogliarola barese) widespread in the Mediterranean basin. Moreover, the incompatibility relationships of cultivar Coratina with some suitable pollinizers (Leccino, Oliastro, and Picholine) have been studied in controlled crosses: the in vitro germination potential of progenies has been evaluated and the selection of cross-derived embryos has been indirectly performed by the molecular characterization of the corresponding endosperm. The results increase knowledge on factors affecting self-compatibility in olive. Moreover, they provide useful information to farmers about the most effective cultivars for the set-up of new olive grove or for graft planning. Finally, they provide a new strategy and procedure based on endosperm analysis by SSRs for an accurate, fast, and relatively cheap screening of embryos/seedlings.Entities:
Keywords: SSRs analysis; endosperm; in vitro embryo culture; olive; self-compatibility
Year: 2019 PMID: 31031787 PMCID: PMC6473062 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Analysis of variance of the mean number of flowers/inflorescence and the mean number of perfect flowers in the four olive cultivars evaluated at the Adriatic (BA) and Ionic (TA) orchards.
| Source of variation | Adriatic coast | Ionic coast | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFI | HF | NFI | HF | ||
| Cultivars | 3 | 7.06 | 2246.17*** | 27.70*** | 959.14*** |
| Error | 16 | 4.68 | 57.40 | 2.13 | 38.92 |
Comparison between the fertility mean values of each cultivar for two seasons and in both environments, by the application of Duncan’s test.
| Cultivar | NFI | % HF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adriatic coast | |||
| Bella di Spagna | 9.1 ± 0.4 | 29.2 ± 1.7B | |
| Coratina | 11.1 ± 0.7 | 97.3 ± 0.4A | |
| Leccino | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 89.3 ± 1.4A | |
| Ogliarola barese | 11.4 ± 0.4 | 88.7 ± 2.1A | |
| | |||
| Ionic coast | |||
| Bella di Spagna | 14.3 ± 1.2AC | 59.9 ± 3.2C | |
| Coratina | 13.3 ± 0.7AB | 92.1 ± 1.5AB | |
| Leccino | 11.1 ± 0.9B | 98.2 ± 0.6A | |
| Ogliarola barese | 16.8 ± 0.3C | 86.7 ± 2.4B | |
| | |||
Analysis of variance of fruit set in the four olive cultivars evaluated in the Adriatic and Ionic orchards.
| Source of variation | Fruit set | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Adriatic coast | Ionic coast | ||
| Type of pollination (P) | 1 | 1,058.68*** | 682.80*** |
| Fruit set timing (T) | 2 | 11.20*** | 32.79*** |
| Genotype (G) | 3 | 229.17*** | 80.57*** |
| P × T | 2 | 1.78 | 1.23 |
| P × G | 3 | 51.64*** | 58.30*** |
| T × G | 6 | 0.21 | 3.23 |
| P × T × G | 6 | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| | |||
Analysis of variance of fruit set percentages at 40, 90, and 120 daf in the four olive cultivars in free and self-pollination conditions for the two locations.
| Source of variation | Fruit set (%) in free pollination | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriatic coast | Ionic coast | ||||||
| 40 | 90 | 120 | 40 | 90 | 120 | ||
| Cultivars | 3 | 73.23*** | 73.81*** | 75.09*** | 26.73* | 46.62*** | 42.72*** |
| Error | 16 | 2.54 | 2.71 | 2.63 | 5.13 | 4.07 | 4.06 |
| Cultivars | 3 | 10.51*** | 12.96*** | 12.35*** | 13.06 | 9.38 | 7.23 |
| Error | 16 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 3.83 | 3.19 | 2.91 |
Comparison between mean values of fruit set percentages of each cultivar at 40, 90, and 120 daf in both environments, in open- and self-pollination conditions.
| Cultivar | Fruit set (%) in free pollination | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriatic coast | Ionic coast | |||||
| 40 | 90 | 120 | 40 | 90 | 120 | |
| Bella di Spagna | 0.54C | 0.26B | 0.21B | 2.23b | 1.01B | 0.77B |
| Coratina | 5.49A | 4.29A | 4.09A | 5.33a | 4.81A | 4.18A |
| Leccino | 3.01B | 2.40A | 2.26A | 5.07a | 4.05A | 3.02A |
| Ogliarola barese | 3.80AB | 3.35A | 3.32A | 3.72a | 3.43A | 3.37A |
| Bella di Spagna | 0.08B | 0.02C | 0.02C | 1.55 | 0.83 | 0.73 |
| Coratina | 0.68A | 0.58A | 0.53A | 1.60 | 1.30 | 1.22 |
| Leccino | 0.19B | 0.14B | 0.13B | 1.62 | 1.18 | 0.84 |
| Ogliarola barese | 0.59A | 0.49A | 0.48A | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.42 |
Evaluation of the self-incompatibility index (ISI), i.e., the fruit set ratio in self- and cross-pollination conditions, in the four olive cultivars studied at 40, 90, and 120 daf both on Adriatic and Ionic orchards.
| Cultivar | ISI value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adriatic coast | Ionic coast | |||||||
| 40 | 90 | 120 | 40 | 90 | 120 | |||
| Bella di Spagna | 0.148 | 0.076 | 0.095 | 0.695 | 0.821 | 0.948 | ||
| Coratina | 0.123 | 0.135 | 0.129 | 0.300 | 0.270 | 0.291 | ||
| Leccino | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.278 | ||
| Ogliarola barese | 0.155 | 0.146 | 0.144 | 0.147 | 0.128 | 0.124 | ||
For each controlled crosses, the numbers of collected seeds, in vitro cultured embryos, recovered plantlets, and the number of identified self-derived progenies are shown.
| Cross | Harvested seeds (n.) | Plantlets (n.) | SSR marker | Alleles in parents (bp) | Self-derived progeny (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C × L | 294 | 153 | 97 | UDO-43 | C: 174–198 | 9.3 |
| C × O | 330 | 227 | 118 | EMO-L | C: 198–198 | 5.9 |
| C × P | 287 | 191 | 100 | UDO-43 | C: 174–198 | 15.0 |
FIGURE 1In vitro culture and development of olive mature embryos derived from controlled crosses. (A) Necked embryo 24 h after dissection; (B) changing color embryo after 3 days of in vitro cultivation; (C) collected endosperm; (D,E) olive seedling with young leaves and secondary roots; (F,G) plantlets moved to soil and greenhouse.
FIGURE 2SSR electropherograms identified in C × L (A), C × O (B), and C × P (C) crosses. Each panel includes peaks (alleles) detected in the host (Coratina), the used pollinator (Leccino, Oliastro, or Picholine), and one of the correspondent recombinant progeny.