R Martín Payo1, J Harris2, J Armes2. 1. Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. martinruben@uniovi.es. 2. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The benefits of physical activity for cancer survivors are increasingly recognised and smartphone applications are available to assist them to become more physically active. Cancer clinicians, however, lack confidence about which physical activity apps to recommend as evidence on their quality and content is limited. Therefore, we reviewed freely available commercial physical activity/fitness apps to systematically assess their behavioural change content and quality of their design. METHODS: Systematic searches of the app stores for Apple and Android operating systems were conducted and apps were screened to identify free apps appropriate for cancer survivors. Quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and behavioural content was evaluated using the Behavioural Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTT). RESULTS: Of 341 apps identified, 67 were judged appropriate for cancer survivors and 46% combined aerobic and strength/stretching content. The overall number of behavioural change techniques (BCT) included was 3.96 (SD = 2.09), with the most frequent being 'feedback on behaviour' and 'goal setting behaviour'. The mean scores for objective and subjective quality were 4.11 (SD = 0.59) and 3.07 (SD = 0.91) respectively (range 0 to 5). Finally, a modest positive correlation was found between the number of BCT and the quality of engagement, awareness and knowledge as assessed by the MARS. CONCLUSION: Only a fifth of retrieved physical activity apps contained potentially suitable content for people affected by cancer. Overall, most apps we reviewed appeared to perform well in terms of their objective quality, but less well at promoting knowledge and awareness or help seeking related to physical activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Many physical activity apps are available but the combined use of MARS and BCTT suggests that not all of them are suitable to the needs is a promising and feasible approach for assessing the applicability, usability and content of physical activity of apps employed by cancer survivors and this study is a first step toward developing a guide.
PURPOSE: The benefits of physical activity for cancer survivors are increasingly recognised and smartphone applications are available to assist them to become more physically active. Cancer clinicians, however, lack confidence about which physical activity apps to recommend as evidence on their quality and content is limited. Therefore, we reviewed freely available commercial physical activity/fitness apps to systematically assess their behavioural change content and quality of their design. METHODS: Systematic searches of the app stores for Apple and Android operating systems were conducted and apps were screened to identify free apps appropriate for cancer survivors. Quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and behavioural content was evaluated using the Behavioural Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTT). RESULTS: Of 341 apps identified, 67 were judged appropriate for cancer survivors and 46% combined aerobic and strength/stretching content. The overall number of behavioural change techniques (BCT) included was 3.96 (SD = 2.09), with the most frequent being 'feedback on behaviour' and 'goal setting behaviour'. The mean scores for objective and subjective quality were 4.11 (SD = 0.59) and 3.07 (SD = 0.91) respectively (range 0 to 5). Finally, a modest positive correlation was found between the number of BCT and the quality of engagement, awareness and knowledge as assessed by the MARS. CONCLUSION: Only a fifth of retrieved physical activity apps contained potentially suitable content for people affected by cancer. Overall, most apps we reviewed appeared to perform well in terms of their objective quality, but less well at promoting knowledge and awareness or help seeking related to physical activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Many physical activity apps are available but the combined use of MARS and BCTT suggests that not all of them are suitable to the needs is a promising and feasible approach for assessing the applicability, usability and content of physical activity of apps employed by cancer survivors and this study is a first step toward developing a guide.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal neoplasms; Mobile applications; Physical activity; Telemedicine
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Edwin D Boudreaux; Molly E Waring; Rashelle B Hayes; Rajani S Sadasivam; Sean Mullen; Sherry Pagoto Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Susan Michie; Michelle Richardson; Marie Johnston; Charles Abraham; Jill Francis; Wendy Hardeman; Martin P Eccles; James Cane; Caroline E Wood Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2013-08
Authors: L Bourke; K E Homer; M A Thaha; L Steed; D J Rosario; K A Robb; J M Saxton; S J C Taylor Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Anouk Middelweerd; Julia S Mollee; C Natalie van der Wal; Johannes Brug; Saskia J Te Velde Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Whitney A Welch; Payton Solk; Lisa Auster-Gussman; Kara L Gavin; Madelyn Whitaker; Erin Cullather; Emily Izenman; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald Ackermann; Bonnie Spring; David Cella; Frank Penedo; Siobhan M Phillips Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Frank J Penedo; Linda M Collins; Payton Solk; Juned Siddique; Jing Song; David Cella; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald T Ackermann; Whitney A Welch; Lisa A Auster-Gussman; Madelyn Whitaker; Erin Cullather; Emily Izenman; Bonnie Spring Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Rubén Martín-Payo; Llara Ferreras-Losilla; Xana González-Méndez; Claudia Leirós-Díaz; Andrea Martínez-Urquijo; Maria Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez Journal: Mhealth Date: 2021-01-20
Authors: Aranzazu Muñoz-Mancisidor; Ruben Martin-Payo; Xana Gonzalez-Mendez; María Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Stefan Bubolz; Gwendolyn Mayer; Nadine Gronewold; Thomas Hilbel; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 5.428