BACKGROUND: The creation of a posterior box isolation of the left atrium (LAPWI) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A) seems to offer promising clinical outcome in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). AIM: This work aims to study the clinical outcome of an ablation strategy based on the creation of a LAPWI during repeat procedures for recurrent AF after an index CB-A procedure for PersAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 33 patients having undergone a repeat procedure consisting in redo PVI plus LAPWI for recurrent PersAF with the CB-A after an index PVI ablation were retrospective included in our study. Electrical reconnection could be documented in 18 veins (13%). The LAPW was successfully isolated solely by CB-A ablation in 30 out of 33 (91%) patients; in the remaining 3 patients, isolation of the LAPW was completed by focal tip-irrigated RF ablation. The mean number of CB-A applications required for the superior portion of the LAPW and the inferior portion of the LAPW creation were 5.4 ± 0.9 and 4 ± 0.6, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 3 months, 28 patients (85%) did not experience recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias during follow-up, without the need of further ablation or class I or III AADs. CONCLUSION: Left posterior wall isolation with the CB-A is feasible and safe during repeat ablation procedures for recurrent PersAF. In our study, the 12-month freedom from any arrhythmia was 85% following this ablation strategy.
BACKGROUND: The creation of a posterior box isolation of the left atrium (LAPWI) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-A) seems to offer promising clinical outcome in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). AIM: This work aims to study the clinical outcome of an ablation strategy based on the creation of a LAPWI during repeat procedures for recurrent AF after an index CB-A procedure for PersAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 33 patients having undergone a repeat procedure consisting in redo PVI plus LAPWI for recurrent PersAF with the CB-A after an index PVI ablation were retrospective included in our study. Electrical reconnection could be documented in 18 veins (13%). The LAPW was successfully isolated solely by CB-A ablation in 30 out of 33 (91%) patients; in the remaining 3 patients, isolation of the LAPW was completed by focal tip-irrigated RF ablation. The mean number of CB-A applications required for the superior portion of the LAPW and the inferior portion of the LAPW creation were 5.4 ± 0.9 and 4 ± 0.6, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 3 months, 28 patients (85%) did not experience recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias during follow-up, without the need of further ablation or class I or III AADs. CONCLUSION: Left posterior wall isolation with the CB-A is feasible and safe during repeat ablation procedures for recurrent PersAF. In our study, the 12-month freedom from any arrhythmia was 85% following this ablation strategy.
Authors: A John Camm; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Y H Lip; Ulrich Schotten; Irene Savelieva; Sabine Ernst; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Nawwar Al-Attar; Gerhard Hindricks; Bernard Prendergast; Hein Heidbuchel; Ottavio Alfieri; Annalisa Angelini; Dan Atar; Paolo Colonna; Raffaele De Caterina; Johan De Sutter; Andreas Goette; Bulent Gorenek; Magnus Heldal; Stefan H Hohloser; Philippe Kolh; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Piotr Ponikowski; Frans H Rutten Journal: Europace Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Vias Markides; Richard J Schilling; Siew Yen Ho; Anthony W C Chow; D Wyn Davies; Nicholas S Peters Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pipin Kojodjojo; Mark D O'Neill; Phang Boon Lim; Louisa Malcolm-Lawes; Zachary I Whinnett; Tushar V Salukhe; Nicholas W Linton; David Lefroy; Anthony Mason; Ian Wright; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; D Wyn Davies Journal: Heart Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Irene Stevenson; Peter M Kistler; Haris M Haqqani; Steven J Spence; John C Goldblatt; Prashanthan Sanders; Jonathan M Kalman Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Alexander Fürnkranz; Stefano Bordignon; Boris Schmidt; Melanie Gunawardene; Britta Schulte-Hahn; Verena Urban; Frank Bode; Bernd Nowak; Julian K R Chun Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-02-11
Authors: Jérôme Kalifa; Kazuhiko Tanaka; Alexey V Zaitsev; Mark Warren; Ravi Vaidyanathan; David Auerbach; Sandeep Pandit; Karen L Vikstrom; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Arkadzi Talkachou; Felipe Atienza; Gérard Guiraudon; José Jalife; Omer Berenfeld Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 29.690