| Literature DB >> 31027191 |
D Travis Thomas1, David M Schnell2, Maja Redzic3, Mingjun Zhao4, Hideat Abraha5, Danielle Jones6, Howard Brim7, Guoqiang Yu8.
Abstract
Intramyocellular (IMCL), extramyocellularEntities:
Keywords: IMCL; metabolic function; sarcopenia; skeletal muscle; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31027191 PMCID: PMC6521174 DOI: 10.3390/nu11040930
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Recruitment for a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, in which aged adults completed seven consecutive days of aerobic training on a treadmill or continued usual activities (normal activity during the 13th week of vitamin D supplementation or place)bo. Serum 25(OH)D, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AL, activity level; AT, aerobic training; CTL, control; D, vitamin D; DAT, vitamin D + aerobic training; NI, not interested; NA, normal activity.
Baseline characteristics of the 46 subjects who completed 13 weeks of supplementation with vitamin D or placebo with the 13th week consisting of AT or usual physical activities.
| Category | Measurement | CTL | AT | D | DAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | 10 (3/7) | 13 (7/6) | 13 (6/7) | 10 (5/5) | |
| Age, years | 67.5 ± 2.1 | 68.6 ± 1.3 | 65.9 ± 1.6 | 67.9 ± 1.9 | |
| White | 9 | 13 | 12 | 9 | |
| Asian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| African American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Anthropometric Measurements | Height, cm | 167 ± 3.0 | 170 ± 2.0 | 168 ± 3.0 | 169 ± 3.0 |
| Weight, kg | 75.1 ± 3.8 | 72.2 ± 3.4 | 76.1 ± 4.1 | 74.6 ± 5.0 | |
| BMI, kg/m | 27.0 ± 1.2 | 24.7 ± 0.8 | 26.6 ± 0.9 | 26.2 ± 1.5 | |
| Serum Measurements | 25(OH)D, ng/mL | 24.8 ± 2.1 | 25.2 ± 1.4 | 26.6 ± 1.2 | 27.1 ± 1.6 |
| VDBP, µg/mL | 110 ± 5 | 114 ± 3 | 111 ± 4 | 115 ± 5 | |
| iPTH, pg/mL | 36.8 ± 3.6 AB | 32.4 ± 2.6 B | 53.1 ± 5.5 C | 47.6 ± 5.0 BC | |
| Physiological Measurements | VO2max, mL/(kg min) | 25.8 ± 1.8 | 28.0 ± 2.9 | 28.4 ± 2.1 | 27.0 ± 2.8 |
| Light PA, min/d | 878 ± 67 | 839 ± 53 | 956 ± 68 | 806 ± 32 | |
| Moderate PA, min/d | 63.2 ± 11.7 | 52.0 ± 5.9 | 59.4 ± 7.7 | 69.6 ± 11.1 | |
| Vigorous PA, min/d | 0.28 ± 0.14 | 0.21 ± 0.11 | 0.69 ± 0.69 | 1.15 ± 0.82 | |
| MVC, | 128 ± 7.6 | 139 ± 10.9 | 149 ± 8.5 | 140 ± 10.7 | |
| Energy Intake, kcal/d | 1741 ± 156 | 2045 ± 325 | 1457 ± 119 | 1789 ± 241 |
All values are mean ± SEM. Serum 25(OH)D, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AT, aerobic training only; CTL, control; D, vitamin D only; DAT, vitamin D + aerobic training; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone, PA, physical activity; VDBP, vitamin D binding protein; VO2max, maximal aerobic capacity. Values not sharing a letter are significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA, Fishers LSD).
Figure 2Schematic representation of the subject timeline. Serum 25(OH)D, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; GXT, graded treadmill exercise test; iCa, serum ionized calcium; iPTH, serum intact parathyroid hormone; MRI/MRS, magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy; NIRS/DCS, near-infrared spectroscopy/diffuse correlation spectroscopy.
Gastrocnemius muscle lipid before and after 13 weeks of supplementation with vitamin D or placebo with the 13th week consisting of AT or usual physical activities.
| Value | Time point | CTL | AT | D | DAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCL | Baseline | 4.84 ± 0.94 | 3.93 ± 0.67 | 3.93 ± 0.61 | 4.27 ± 0.93 |
| Endpoint | 5.01 ± 0.72 | 4.10 ± 0.92 | 3.95 ± 0.65 | 2.26 ± 0.61 | |
| Change | 0.16 ± 0.54 | 0.17 ± 0.68 | 0.02 ± 0.47 | −2.02 ± 0.78 * | |
| EMCL | Baseline | 27.3 ± 2.4 | 26.0 ± 1.1 | 28.0 ± 1.8 | 25.8 ± 1.4 |
| Endpoint | 25.5 ± 2.0 | 25.7 ± 1.4 | 28.0 ± 1.5 | 25.2 ± 1.8 | |
| Change | −1.7 ± 1.4 | −0.3 ± 1.0 | −0.4 ± 1.0 | −0.6 ± 0.7 | |
| IMCL:EMCL | Baseline | 0.162 ± 0.034 | 0.156 ± 0.025 | 0.150 ± 0.022 | 0.183 ± 0.039 |
| Endpoint | 0.218 ± 0.041 | 0.164 ± 0.040 | 0.141 ± 0.022 | 0.138 ± 0.048 | |
| Change | 0.056 ± 0.045 | 0.008 ± 0.028 | −0.001 ± 0.018 | −0.041 ± 0.040 |
Intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) was calculated by magnetic resonance spectral abundance relative to total water content. Extramyocellular lipid (EMCL) was calculated as percent of medial and lateral gastrocnemius cross sectional area. Change is defined as the difference between baseline and endpoint values. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; * (p < 0.05, RMANOVA).
Figure 3IMCL response to 13 weeks of intervention. (A) DAT decreases IMCL from baseline after 13 weeks. Bars represent mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05; paired t-test. (B) Change in IMCL content proportional to change in 25(OH)D concentration from baseline to endpoint. Serum 25(OH)D, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AT, aerobic training; AU, arbitrary units; CTL, control; D, vitamin D; DAT, vitamin D + aerobic training; IMCL, intramyocellular lipid.
Figure A1Representative profiles of a typical response seen in subjects when completing the fatiguing exercise. Standard illustrative profile of (A) relative blood flow, (B) relative oxygen consumption rate, and (C) blood oxygen saturation in a subjects throughout fatiguing exercise. Solid vertical lines indicate the beginning and the end of fatiguing exercise. Horizontal lines indicate end of exercise, post-exercise steady-state, and midpoint values. Hashed vertical lines illustrate the recovery half-time (T50) of relative oxygen consumption following fatiguing exercise. rBF, relative blood flow; rVO2, relative oxygen consumption; StO2, oxygen saturation.
Figure 4NIRS/DCS measurements in response to 13 weeks of intervention. (A) Relative blood flow during exercise by group. (B) Oxygen consumption by group during exercise at study endpoint. (C) Change in Oxygen saturation by group at study baseline and endpoint at 8 min of recovery after plantar flexion exercise. (D) Recovery half-time of oxygen consumption at study baseline and endpoint. Bars represent mean ± SEM; labeled means without a common letter differ, p < 0.05, ANOVA (A) RMANOVA (B); * p < 0.05, paired t-test. AT, aerobic training; CTL, control; D, vitamin D; DAT, vitamin D + aerobic training; rBF, relative blood flow; ΔStO2, pre- to post-exercise change in oxygen saturation; rVO2, relative oxygen consumption; rVO2 T50, relative oxygen consumption recovery half-time.
Baseline, midpoint, and endpoint values for blood measurements.
| Measurement | Time Point | CTL | AT | D | DAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25(OH)D, ng/mL | Baseline | 24.8 ± 2.1 | 25.2 ± 1.4 | 26.6 ± 1.2 | 27.1 ± 1.6 |
| Midpoint | 29.5 ± 3.2 A | 31.2 ± 2.7 *A | 54.1 ± 3.0 *B | 62.0 ± 4.5 *B | |
| End Study | 31.0 ± 3.3 *A | 32.6 ± 3.1 *A | 63.7 ± 5.0 *B | 72.1 ± 5.2 *B | |
| VDBP, µg/ mL | Baseline | 110 ± 5 | 115 ± 3 | 111 ± 4 | 115 ± 5 |
| Midpoint | 109 ± 6 | 109 ± 7 | 109 ± 5 | 104 ± 10 | |
| End Study | 115 ± 6 | 110 ± 4 | 110 ± 4 | 108 ± 7 | |
| Ionized Ca, mg/dL | Baseline | 5.01 ± 0.05 | 5.09 ± 0.03 | 5.09 ± 0.03 | 5.04 ± 0.05 |
| Midpoint | 5.00 ± 0.03 | 5.12 ± 0.06 | 5.09 ± 0.04 | 4.97 ± 0.06 | |
| End Study | 4.98 ± 0.02 | 5.04 ± 0.04 | 5.09 ± 0.04 | 5.06 ± 0.07 | |
| Intact PTH, pg/ mL | Baseline | 36.8 ± 3.6 A | 32.4 ± 2.6 A | 53.1 ± 5.5 B | 47.6 ± 5.0 B |
| Midpoint | 43.1 ± 5.6 | 39.7 ± 3.8 * | 39.9 ± 4.0 * | 47.0 ± 6.3 * | |
| End Study | 43.9 ± 6.9 | 37.8 ± 3.4 * | 41.7 ± 3.5 * | 41.5 ± 5.3 * | |
| Insulin, µIU/mL | Baseline | 15.3 ± 3.6 | 8.0 ± 1.1 | 9.22 ± 1.0 | 18.5 ± 6.3 |
| Midpoint | 21.5 ± 9.7 | 12.2 ± 2.5 | 17.9 ± 3.6 | 26.9 ± 14.8 | |
| End Study | 10.7 ± 2.9 | 8.35 ± 1.2 | 11.1 ± 1.3 | 12.6 ± 3.0 | |
| Glucose, mg/dL | Baseline | 99.0 ± 4.3 | 91.7 ± 4.2 | 97.2 ± 2.2 | 96.3 ± 1.5 |
| Midpoint | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| End Study | 97.6 ± 4.0 | 94.1 ± 2.1 | 98.2 ± 2.2 | 96.7 ± 2.8 | |
| HOMA-IR | Baseline | 3.93 ± 1.04 | 1.78 ± 0.23 | 2.23 ± 0.25 | 4.34 ± 1.43 |
| Midpoint | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| End Study | 2.68 ± 1.02 | 1.95 ± 0.28 | 2.69 ± 0.32 | 3.02 ± 0.71 |
All values presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs baseline (paired samples t-test); values within a time point not sharing a letter are significantly different (p < 0.05, ANOVA); -- no data collected. AT, aerobic training; CTL, control; D, vitamin D; DAT, vitamin D + aerobic training.