Literature DB >> 31026557

Correlation of Tumor Treating Fields Dosimetry to Survival Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Large-Scale Numerical Simulation-Based Analysis of Data from the Phase 3 EF-14 Randomized Trial.

Matthew T Ballo1, Noa Urman2, Gitit Lavy-Shahaf2, Jai Grewal3, Ze'ev Bomzon2, Steven Toms4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are approved for glioblastoma based on improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase 3 EF-14 trial of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To test the hypothesis that increasing TTFields dose at the tumor site improves patient outcomes, we performed a simulation-based study investigating the association between TTFields dose and survival (OS and PFS) in patients treated with TTFields in EF-14. METHODS AND MATERIALS: EF-14 patient cases (N = 340) were included. Realistic head models were derived from T1-contrast images captured at baseline. The transducer array layout on each patient was obtained from EF-14 records; average compliance (fraction of time patient was on active treatment) and average electrical current delivered to the patient were derived from log files of the TTFields devices used by patients. TTFields intensity distributions and power densities were calculated using the finite element method. Local minimum dose density (LMiDD) was defined as the product of TTFields intensity, tissue-specific conductivities, and patient compliance. The average LMiDD within a tumor bed comprising the gross tumor volume and the 3-mm-wide peritumoral boundary zone was calculated.
RESULTS: The median OS and PFS were significantly longer when the average LMiDD in the tumor bed was ≥0.77 mW/cm3: OS was 25.2 versus 20.4 months (P = .003, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.611) and PFS was 8.5 versus 6.7 months (P = .02, HR = 0.699). The median OS and PFS were longer when the average TTFields intensity was >1.06 V/cm: OS was 24.3 versus 21.6 months (P = .03, HR = 0.705) and PFS was 8.1 versus 7.9 months (P = .03, HR = 0.721).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study we present the first reported analysis demonstrating patient-level dose responses to TTFields. We provide a rigorous definition for TTFields dose and set a conceptual framework for future work on TTFields dosimetry and treatment planning.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31026557     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

1.  Tumor Treating Fields for Ovarian Carcinoma: A Modeling Study.

Authors:  Edwin Lok; Pyay San; Victoria White; Olivia Liang; Page C Widick; Sindhu Pisati Reddy; Eric T Wong
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17

2.  Guidelines for Burr Hole Surgery in Combination With Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma: A Computational Study on Dose Optimization and Array Layout Planning.

Authors:  Fang Cao; Nikola Mikic; Eric T Wong; Axel Thielscher; Anders Rosendal Korshoej
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 3.  Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ohad Regev; Vladimir Merkin; Deborah T Blumenthal; Israel Melamed; Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2021-04-20

4.  PTEN mutations predict benefit from tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Antonio Dono; Sonali Mitra; Mauli Shah; Takeshi Takayasu; Jay-Jiguang Zhu; Nitin Tandon; Chirag B Patel; Yoshua Esquenazi; Leomar Y Ballester
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Current usage of tumor treating fields for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andrew B Lassman; Adela E Joanta-Gomez; Peter C Pan; Wolfgang Wick
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-06-04

Review 6.  Integration of Tumor-Treating Fields into the Multidisciplinary Management of Patients with Solid Malignancies.

Authors:  Yuefeng Wang; Manjari Pandey; Matthew T Ballo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-23

7.  Circular RNA: A novel type of biomarker for glioma (Review).

Authors:  Wei Sun; Huandi Zhou; Xuetao Han; Liubing Hou; Xiaoying Xue
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 8.  Prevention and Management of Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Tumor Treating Fields in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mario E Lacouture; Milan J Anadkat; Matthew T Ballo; Fabio Iwamoto; Suriya A Jeyapalan; Renato V La Rocca; Margaret Schwartz; Jennifer N Serventi; Martin Glas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  In Vivo Safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Applied to the Torso.

Authors:  Roni Blatt; Shiri Davidi; Mijal Munster; Anna Shteingauz; Shay Cahal; Adel Zeidan; Tal Marciano; Zeev Bomzon; Adi Haber; Moshe Giladi; Uri Weinberg; Adrian Kinzel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Tumor Treating Fields in the Management of Patients with Malignant Gliomas.

Authors:  Ashley P Ghiaseddin; David Shin; Kaitlyn Melnick; David D Tran
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.