| Literature DB >> 31026271 |
Kerry Murphy1, Marla J Keller1, Kathryn Anastos1,2, Shada Sinclair3, J Cooper Devlin4, Qiuhu Shi5, Donald R Hoover6, Brian Starkman7, Jamie McGillick8, Caroline Mullis9, Howard Minkoff10, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello11, Betsy C Herold3,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reproductive aging may impact the vaginal microbiome and genital tract mucosal immune environment and contribute to genital tract health in women living with and at-risk for HIV infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31026271 PMCID: PMC6485713 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Mechanisms mediating risk for HIV acquisition and transmission in menopausal women.
Numbers and corresponding labels indicate potential mechanisms. During menopause there is a loss of epithelial barrier integrity (1) and increase in BV associated species including Atopobium, Prevotella, and Gardnerella (2), which influence release of proinflammatory cytokines e.g. IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-8 (3) promoting recruitment and/or activation of HIV target cells (4) which may increase risk for HIV acquisition and for HIV positive women increase HIV replication (5) and subsequent viral shedding (6). Loss of H202 producing protective lactobacillus species Lactobacillus (L.) crispatus, L jensenii, L. gasseri (7) and decreased protective immune mediators (human beta defensins, SLPI) (8) may also increase risk for HIV acquisition during menopause. In menopausal women with HIV, E. coli antibacterial activity is lower, reflecting a Lactobacillus deficient microbiome and HSV inhibitory activity is higher reflective of inflammation.
Demographic and clinical characteristics for all participants.
| HIV+ Pre | HIV+ Post (n = 51) | p | HIV- Pre | HIV- Post (n = 19) | p | p value across HIV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.4 | 55.9 | 44.7 | 55.6 | 0.94 | |||
| Black | 34 (66.7%) | 38 (74.5%) | 0.53 | 11 (55%) | 14 (73.7%) | 0.57 | 0.57 |
| White | 9 (17.6%) | 5 (9.8%) | 3 (15%) | 2 (10.5%) | |||
| Other | 8 (15.7%) | 8 (15.7%) | 6 (30%) | 3 (15.8%) | |||
| 21 (41.2%) | 17 (33.3%) | 0.54 | 12 (60%) | 12 (63.2%) | >0.99 | ||
| 40 (81.6%) | 50 (100%) | 14 (70%) | 19 (100%) | 0.36 | |||
| 3 (5.9%) | 23 (46%) | 1 (5%) | 8 (42.1%) | 0.83 | |||
| 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.46 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.89 | 0.89 | |
| 5.2 | 5.2 | 0.08 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 0.77 | 0.95 | |
| 63.15 | 20 | 60.2 | 20 | 0.98 | |||
| 4.6 | 49.8 | 5.95 (4.5,10) | 38.5 (29,59) | 0.18 | |||
| 46 (90.2%) | 46 (90.2%) | >0.99 | |||||
| 38/46 (82.6%) | 43/46 (93.5%) | 0.20 | |||||
| 37 (72.6%) | 36 (70.6%) | >0.99 | |||||
| 28/29 (96.6%) | 43/45 (95.6%) | >0.99 | |||||
| 29/49 (59.2%) | 35/51 (68.6%) | 0.4 |
Categorical variables reported as n (%) and continuous variables reported as median (25th%,75th%). p values are reported between HIV+ pre and postmenopausal participants, HIV- pre and postmenopausal participants and between all HIV- and HIV+ participants.
Fig 2HIV+ postmenopausal participants have significantly lower CVL E. coli and higher HSV inhibitory activity.
CVL E. coli (A), HSV (B) and HIV inhibitory activity (C) in premenopausal and postmenopausal HIV negative and HIV positive participants. The lines represent the median with interquartile range for percent inhibition of E. coli colonies (A) percent inhibition of HSV plaques (B) and percent reduction in relative luciferase units compared with control (C). Comparisons were made between all pairwise groups, only those with p values ≤ 0.05 and those comparing pre and postmenopausal participants are reported. Circle indicates HIV enhancing activity in HIV+ participants on ART.
Associations of antimicrobial activity with select immune mediators and vaginal bacteria among all participants.
| rho | p | |
|---|---|---|
| Nugent score | -0.3 | <0.001 |
| Vaginal pH | -0.4 | <0.001 |
| Log10 SLPI | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| Log10 HBD-2 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| Log10 HBD-3 | 0.28 | <0.001 |
| Log10 S100-A9 | 0.47 | <0.001 |
| Log10 SPINK5 | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| IP-10 | 0.36 | <0.001 |
| 0.34 | <0.001 | |
| Log10 HNP 1–3 | 0.33 | <0.001 |
| Log10 Lactoferrin | 0.34 | <0.001 |
| Log10 IL-6 | 0.32 | 0.004 |
| Log10 IL-8 | 0.44 | <0.001 |
| Log10 Fibronectin | 0.33 | <0.001 |
| IL-1α | -0.34 | <0.001 |
| -0.26 | 0.002 | |
| BVAB-2 gene copies | -0.30 | <0.001 |
Spearman correlation coefficients reported as rho with associated p values
Fig 3Differences in the taxonomic composition of the vaginal microbiome by reproductive status and levels of E. coli and HIV inhibitory activity.
Taxonomic composition of the vaginal microbiome by reproductive status for HIV+ (A) and HIV- (B) participants, by levels of CVL E. coli bactericidal activity for HIV+ (C) and HIV- (D) participants and by levels of CVL HIV inhibitory activity for HIV+ (E) and HIV- (F) participants. Proportion of genera contributing >1% shown. Asterisks (*) indicate taxa with significantly different relative abundances between groups as determined by an LDA score ≥2. Low and high E. coli and HIV inhibition correspond to the bottom and top quartiles.
Concentrations of mucosal immune mediators in HIV+ and HIV- premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
| HIV+ Pre (n = 51) | HIV+ Post (n = 51) | p | HIV- Pre (n = 20) | HIV- Post (n = 19) | p | p value across HIV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.32 (0.31) | 2.21 (0.29) | 0.07 | 2.33 (0.29) | 2.25 (0.27) | 0.32 | 0.71 | |
| 1.98 (0.61) | 1.78 (0.72) | 0.28 | 2.06 (0.53) | 1.80 (0.65) | 0.28 | 0.77 | |
| 51% (25) | 45.1% (23) | 0.69 | 60% (12) | 52.6% (10) | 0.75 | 0.45 | |
| 0.54 (0.60) | 0.05 (0.45) | 0.08 (0.46) | 0.08 (0.55) | 0.98 | 0.23 | ||
| 2.02 (0.73) | 1.96 (0.88) | 0.80 | 1.98 (0.84) | 1.77 (0.81) | 0.51 | 0.49 | |
| 20.4% (10) | 23.5% (12) | 0.81 | 20% (4) | 15.8% (3) | >0.99 | 0.65 | |
| 6.1% (3) | 3.9% (2) | 0.67 | 10% (2) | 5.3% (1) | >0.99 | 0.69 | |
| 65.3% (32) | 58.8% (30) | 0.54 | 60% (12) | 63.2% (12) | >0.99 | >0.99 | |
| 10.2% (5) | 15.7% (8) | 0.55 | 5% (1) | 15.8% (3) | 0.34 | 0.78 | |
| 49% (24) | 52.9% (27) | 0.84 | 45% (9) | 42.1% (8) | >0.99 | 0.46 | |
| 16.3% (8) | 21.6% (11) | 0.61 | 25% (5) | 21% (4) | >0.99 | 0.64 | |
| 40.8% (20) | 45.1% (23) | 0.69 | 47.4% (9) | 47.4% (9) | >0.99 | 0.70 | |
| 4.45 (1.18) | 4.90 (1.16) | 0.06 | 3.97 (1.46) | 4.26 (1.56) | 0.55 | ||
| 2.86 (0.52) | 2.97 (0.67) | 0.36 | 2.77 (0.50) | 2.76 (0.73) | 0.97 | 0.19 | |
| 0.39 (0.96) | 0.38 (0.94) | 0.98 | 0.52 (1.03) | 0.43 (0.92) | 0.78 | 0.62 | |
| 2.51 (0.81) | 1.95 (0.62) | 2.72 (0.87) | 1.98 (0.63) | 0.37 | |||
| 1.97 (0.50) | 1.53 (0.24) | 2.13 (0.55) | 1.49 (0.23) | 0.44 | |||
| 4.67 (1.13) | 3.68 (0.92) | 4.53 (0.99) | 3.90 (1.05) | 0.06 | 0.82 | ||
| 0.67 (0.96) | 0.88 (0.82) | 0.25 | 0.64 (0.94) | 0.76 (0.66) | 0.66 | 0.64 | |
| 2.16 (0.53) | 2.14 (0.51) | 0.86 | 2.32 (0.60) | 2.24 (0.45) | 0.64 | 0.18 | |
| 2.59 (0.29) | 2.42 (0.27) | 2.64 (0.36) | 2.49 (0.25) | 0.17 | 0.30 |
[% (n) >LLOD or log mean (S.D.) as indicated]
qPCR concentrations of bacteria from vaginal swabs.
| HIV+ Pre | HIV+ Post | p | HIV- Pre | HIV- Post | p | p value across | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % (No.) PCR + | 68.6% | 70.6% | >0.99 | 60% | 94.7% | 0.53 | |
| Gene copies/swab, median (IQR) | 703 | 433 | 692 | 7094 | 0.51 | 0.13 | |
| % (No.) PCR+ | 47% | 31.3% | 0.15 | 45% | 42.1% | >0.99 | 0.70 |
| Gene copies/swab | 50 | 50 | 0.08 | 50 | 50 | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| % (No.) PCR+ | 88.9% | 69.7% | 94.4% | 61.1% | 0.81 | ||
| Gene copies/swab | 5.4x106 | 1.2x104 | 2.4X106 | 1.7x104 | 0.13 | ||
| % (No.) PCR+ | 96% | 100% | 0.50 | 90% | 100% | 0.49 | 0.31 |
| Gene copies/swab | 2.49 x 106 | 2.33 x 106 | 0.41 | 1.07 x 106 | 1.04 x 106 | 0.10 | 0.54 |
| % (No.) PCR+ | 72.5% | 68.6% | 0.82 | 85% | 84.2% | >0.99 | 0.13 |
| Gene copies/swab | 181 | 55 | 0.69 | 2262 | 55 | 0.057 | 0.36 |
| % (No.) PCR+ | 31.1% | 28.3% | 0.82 | 35% | 16.7% (3/18) | 0.28 | 0.83 |
| Gene copies/swab | 9.7 | 9.7 | 0.55 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 0.21 | 0.70 |
Results reported as both number (No.) PCR+ and median gene copies/swab (IQR)
*Denominator for L. iners and Prevotella bivia differs from other species due to limitations in the quantity of DNA available.