Panu Piirainen1, Hannu Kokki1, Brian Anderson2, Jacqueline Hannam2, Heidi Hautajärvi3, Veli-Pekka Ranta4, Merja Kokki5. 1. School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 2. Departments of Anaesthesiology, and Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Admescope Ltd, Oulu, Finland. 4. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 5. Department of Anaesthesia and Operative Services, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Abstract
AIMS: Early pain after laparoscopy is often severe. Oxycodone is a feasible analgesic option after laparoscopy, but there are sparse data on epidural administration. The aim was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of epidural oxycodone as a part of multimodal analgesia after gynaecological laparoscopy. METHODS:Women (n = 60), aged 23-71 years, undergoingelective gynaecological laparoscopy, were administrated either epidural oxycodone 0.1mg kg-1 and intravenous (i.v.) saline (EPI-group n = 31), or epidural saline and i.v. oxycodone 0.1 mg kg-1 (IV-group = 29) in a randomised, double blind, active control, double dummy clinical trial. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using population modelling of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations obtained in these patients and data of 2 published studies. The primary outcome was the amount of i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia during the first 4 hours. RESULTS: Twenty of the 31 patients in the EPI-group and 26 of the 29 patients in the IV-group needed i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia, P = .021. The median (interquartile range) number of fentanyl doses were 1.0 (1.0-3.0) in the EPI-group and 2.5 (1.0-4.0) doses in the IV-group, P = .008. Plasma concentrations were similar, but CSF concentrations were 100-fold higher in the EPI-group. The population model indicated that 60% of oxycodone injected into the epidural space enters into CSF and 40% is absorbed into the systemic circulation. CONCLUSIONS: The data support superiority of epidural administration of oxycodone compared to i.v. administration during the first hours after laparoscopic surgery. This is likely to be based on enhanced permeation into the central nervous system after epidural administration.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Early pain after laparoscopy is often severe. Oxycodone is a feasible analgesic option after laparoscopy, but there are sparse data on epidural administration. The aim was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of epidural oxycodone as a part of multimodal analgesia after gynaecological laparoscopy. METHODS:Women (n = 60), aged 23-71 years, undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy, were administrated either epidural oxycodone 0.1 mg kg-1 and intravenous (i.v.) saline (EPI-group n = 31), or epidural saline and i.v. oxycodone 0.1 mg kg-1 (IV-group = 29) in a randomised, double blind, active control, double dummy clinical trial. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using population modelling of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations obtained in these patients and data of 2 published studies. The primary outcome was the amount of i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia during the first 4 hours. RESULTS: Twenty of the 31 patients in the EPI-group and 26 of the 29 patients in the IV-group needed i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia, P = .021. The median (interquartile range) number of fentanyl doses were 1.0 (1.0-3.0) in the EPI-group and 2.5 (1.0-4.0) doses in the IV-group, P = .008. Plasma concentrations were similar, but CSF concentrations were 100-fold higher in the EPI-group. The population model indicated that 60% of oxycodone injected into the epidural space enters into CSF and 40% is absorbed into the systemic circulation. CONCLUSIONS: The data support superiority of epidural administration of oxycodone compared to i.v. administration during the first hours after laparoscopic surgery. This is likely to be based on enhanced permeation into the central nervous system after epidural administration.
Authors: Perla Ekstein; Amir Szold; Boaz Sagie; Nachum Werbin; Joseph M Klausner; Avi A Weinbroum Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil V Marrion; John A Peters; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Bogumił Olczak; Grzegorz Kowalski; Wojciech Leppert; Agnieszka Bienert; Artur Teżyk; Michał Adamski; Stanisław Rzymski; Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Antti Valtola; James D Morse; Pawel Florkiewicz; Heidi Hautajärvi; Pasi Lahtinen; Tadeusz Musialowicz; Brian J Anderson; Veli-Pekka Ranta; Hannu Kokki Journal: J Drug Assess Date: 2020-07-28