Ping Mei1,2, Konstantin Shilo2, Lai Wei3, Rulong Shen2, Dena Tonkovich2, Zaibo Li2. 1. Department of Pathology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. 3. Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by the 22C3 pharmDx companion assay has been validated in surgical specimens to support pembrolizumab treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The aims of this study were 1) to assess the adequacy of cytologic specimens for PD-L1 evaluation and 2) to explore correlations of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathologic and molecular features. METHODS: The study cohort included 100 cytology specimens (fluid [n = 28] and fine-needle aspiration [n = 72]) and 165 surgical specimens (biopsy [n = 138] and resection [n = 27]). The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 assay and staining assessment were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. PD-L1 expression was correlated with patients' demographics, pathologic characteristics, and molecular alterations. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two specimens (53.6%) were positive for PD-L1 expression (≥1%). No statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression was identified between cytologic (56.0%) and surgical specimens (52.1%). Seventy-four of 190 tested cases (38.9%) had genetic alterations. PD-L1 positivity was significantly more prevalent in cases with genetic alterations than in cases without genetic alterations. Furthermore, both PD-L1 positivity and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) had statistically significant associations with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. PD-L1 expression had no significant association with histologic phenotypes or other clinicopathologic features. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that cytologic specimens are comparable to surgical specimens for PD-L1 evaluation. The association of PD-L1 expression with KRAS mutations may have clinical relevance in selecting patients with NSCLC for immunotherapy.
BACKGROUND:Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by the 22C3 pharmDx companion assay has been validated in surgical specimens to support pembrolizumab treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The aims of this study were 1) to assess the adequacy of cytologic specimens for PD-L1 evaluation and 2) to explore correlations of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathologic and molecular features. METHODS: The study cohort included 100 cytology specimens (fluid [n = 28] and fine-needle aspiration [n = 72]) and 165 surgical specimens (biopsy [n = 138] and resection [n = 27]). The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 assay and staining assessment were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. PD-L1 expression was correlated with patients' demographics, pathologic characteristics, and molecular alterations. RESULTS: One hundred forty-two specimens (53.6%) were positive for PD-L1 expression (≥1%). No statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression was identified between cytologic (56.0%) and surgical specimens (52.1%). Seventy-four of 190 tested cases (38.9%) had genetic alterations. PD-L1 positivity was significantly more prevalent in cases with genetic alterations than in cases without genetic alterations. Furthermore, both PD-L1 positivity and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) had statistically significant associations with Kirsten ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. PD-L1 expression had no significant association with histologic phenotypes or other clinicopathologic features. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that cytologic specimens are comparable to surgical specimens for PD-L1 evaluation. The association of PD-L1 expression with KRAS mutations may have clinical relevance in selecting patients with NSCLC for immunotherapy.
Authors: Joan H Schiller; David Harrington; Chandra P Belani; Corey Langer; Alan Sandler; James Krook; Junming Zhu; David H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-01-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Esra A Akbay; Shohei Koyama; Julian Carretero; Abigail Altabef; Jeremy H Tchaicha; Camilla L Christensen; Oliver R Mikse; Andrew D Cherniack; Ellen M Beauchamp; Trevor J Pugh; Matthew D Wilkerson; Peter E Fecci; Mohit Butaney; Jacob B Reibel; Margaret Soucheray; Travis J Cohoon; Pasi A Janne; Matthew Meyerson; D Neil Hayes; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Takeshi Shimamura; Lynette M Sholl; Scott J Rodig; Gordon J Freeman; Peter S Hammerman; Glenn Dranoff; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vamsidhar Velcheti; Kurt A Schalper; Daniel E Carvajal; Valsamo K Anagnostou; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Mario Sznol; Roy S Herbst; Scott N Gettinger; Lieping Chen; David L Rimm Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: K Azuma; K Ota; A Kawahara; S Hattori; E Iwama; T Harada; K Matsumoto; K Takayama; S Takamori; M Kage; T Hoshino; Y Nakanishi; I Okamoto Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jennifer M Boland; Eugene D Kwon; Susan M Harrington; Jason A Wampfler; Hui Tang; Ping Yang; Marie Christine Aubry Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: A D'Incecco; M Andreozzi; V Ludovini; E Rossi; A Capodanno; L Landi; C Tibaldi; G Minuti; J Salvini; E Coppi; A Chella; G Fontanini; M E Filice; L Tornillo; R M Incensati; S Sani; L Crinò; L Terracciano; F Cappuzzo Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 7.640