Kenton J Johnston1, Hefei Wen2, Mario Schootman3, Karen E Joynt Maddox4. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy and Center for Outcomes Research, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. johnstonkj@slu.edu. 2. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Clinical Analytics and Insights, Center for Clinical Excellence, SSM Health, St. Louis, MO, USA. 4. Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC) hospitalizations are used to evaluate physicians' performance in Medicare value-based payment programs. However, these measures may disadvantage physicians caring for vulnerable populations because they omit social, cognitive, and functional factors that may be important determinants of hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether social, cognitive, and functional risk factors are associated with ACSC hospitalization rates and whether adjusting for them changes outpatient safety-net providers' performance. DESIGN: Using data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we conducted patient-level multivariable regression to estimate the association (as incidence rate ratios (IRRs)) between patient-reported social, cognitive, and functional risk factors and ACSC hospitalizations. We compared outpatient safety-net and non-safety-net providers' performance after adjusting for clinical comorbidities alone and after additional adjustment for social, cognitive, and functional factors captured in survey data. SETTING: Safety-net and non-safety-net clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries contributing 38,616 person-years from 2006 to 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Acute and chronic ACSC hospitalizations. RESULTS: After adjusting for clinical comorbidities, Alzheimer's/dementia (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.65), difficulty with 3-6 activities of daily living (ADLs) (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05-1.94), difficulty with 1-2 instrumental ADLs (IADLs, IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.90), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.90, 95% CI 1.49-2.43) were associated with acute ACSC hospitalization. Low income (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.58), lack of educational attainment (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.69), being unmarried (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.36), difficulty with 1-2 IADLs (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.80) were associated with chronic ACSC hospitalization. Adding these factors to standard Medicare risk adjustment eliminated outpatient safety-net providers' performance gap (p < .05) on ACSC hospitalization rates relative to non-safety-net providers. CONCLUSIONS: Social, cognitive, and functional risk factors are independently associated with ACSC hospitalizations. Failure to account for them may penalize outpatient safety-net providers for factors that are beyond their control.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC) hospitalizations are used to evaluate physicians' performance in Medicare value-based payment programs. However, these measures may disadvantage physicians caring for vulnerable populations because they omit social, cognitive, and functional factors that may be important determinants of hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether social, cognitive, and functional risk factors are associated with ACSC hospitalization rates and whether adjusting for them changes outpatient safety-net providers' performance. DESIGN: Using data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we conducted patient-level multivariable regression to estimate the association (as incidence rate ratios (IRRs)) between patient-reported social, cognitive, and functional risk factors and ACSC hospitalizations. We compared outpatient safety-net and non-safety-net providers' performance after adjusting for clinical comorbidities alone and after additional adjustment for social, cognitive, and functional factors captured in survey data. SETTING: Safety-net and non-safety-net clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries contributing 38,616 person-years from 2006 to 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Acute and chronic ACSC hospitalizations. RESULTS: After adjusting for clinical comorbidities, Alzheimer's/dementia (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.65), difficulty with 3-6 activities of daily living (ADLs) (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05-1.94), difficulty with 1-2 instrumental ADLs (IADLs, IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.90), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.90, 95% CI 1.49-2.43) were associated with acute ACSC hospitalization. Low income (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.58), lack of educational attainment (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.69), being unmarried (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.36), difficulty with 1-2 IADLs (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.80) were associated with chronic ACSC hospitalization. Adding these factors to standard Medicare risk adjustment eliminated outpatient safety-net providers' performance gap (p < .05) on ACSC hospitalization rates relative to non-safety-net providers. CONCLUSIONS: Social, cognitive, and functional risk factors are independently associated with ACSC hospitalizations. Failure to account for them may penalize outpatient safety-net providers for factors that are beyond their control.
Authors: Karen E Joynt; Nancy De Lew; Steven H Sheingold; Patrick H Conway; Kate Goodrich; Arnold M Epstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adam A Markovitz; Chandy Ellimoottil; Devraj Sukul; Samyukta Mullangi; Lena M Chen; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Andrew M Ryan Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jennifer Meddings; Heidi Reichert; Shawna N Smith; Theodore J Iwashyna; Kenneth M Langa; Timothy P Hofer; Laurence F McMahon Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Susannah M Bernheim; John A Spertus; Kimberly J Reid; Elizabeth H Bradley; Rani A Desai; Eric D Peterson; Saif S Rathore; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Philip G Jones; Ali Rahimi; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jasmina I Ivanova; Daniel S Mytelka; Mei Sheng Duh; Howard G Birnbaum; Alice Kate Cummings; Alexandra M San Roman; Gregory L Price; Ralph W Swindle Journal: Patient Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2004
Authors: Claire K Ankuda; Katherine A Ornstein; Kenneth E Covinsky; Evan Bollens-Lund; Diane E Meier; Amy S Kelley Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Rishi K Wadhera; Karen E Joynt Maddox; Nihar R Desai; Bruce E Landon; Muthiah Vaduganathan Md; Lauren G Gilstrap; Changyu Shen; Robert W Yeh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Madeline R Sterling; Joanna Bryan Ringel; Laura C Pinheiro; Monika M Safford; Emily B Levitan; Erica Phillips; Todd M Brown; Parag Goyal Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Hannah P Truong; Alina A Luke; Gmerice Hammond; Rishi K Wadhera; Mat Reidhead; Karen E Joynt Maddox Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.178