Literature DB >> 31024137

The successor representation in human reinforcement learning.

I Momennejad1, E M Russek2, J H Cheong3, M M Botvinick4, N D Daw5, S J Gershman6.   

Abstract

Theories of reward learning in neuroscience have focused on two families of algorithms thought to capture deliberative versus habitual choice. 'Model-based' algorithms compute the value of candidate actions from scratch, whereas 'model-free' algorithms make choice more efficient but less flexible by storing pre-computed action values. We examine an intermediate algorithmic family, the successor representation, which balances flexibility and efficiency by storing partially computed action values: predictions about future events. These pre-computation strategies differ in how they update their choices following changes in a task. The successor representation's reliance on stored predictions about future states predicts a unique signature of insensitivity to changes in the task's sequence of events, but flexible adjustment following changes to rewards. We provide evidence for such differential sensitivity in two behavioural studies with humans. These results suggest that the successor representation is a computational substrate for semi-flexible choice in humans, introducing a subtler, more cognitive notion of habit.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 31024137     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0180-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  48 in total

1.  The Successor Representation: Its Computational Logic and Neural Substrates.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How humans learn and represent networks.

Authors:  Christopher W Lynn; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Computational evidence for hierarchically structured reinforcement learning in humans.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Deforming the metric of cognitive maps distorts memory.

Authors:  Jacob L S Bellmund; William de Cothi; Tom A Ruiter; Matthias Nau; Caswell Barry; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-11-18

5.  The prevalence and importance of statistical learning in human cognition and behavior.

Authors:  Brynn E Sherman; Kathryn N Graves; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-29

6.  Discovery of hierarchical representations for efficient planning.

Authors:  Momchil S Tomov; Samyukta Yagati; Agni Kumar; Wanqian Yang; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Offline replay supports planning in human reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Ida Momennejad; A Ross Otto; Nathaniel D Daw; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Improving the Reliability of Computational Analyses: Model-Based Planning and Its Relationship With Compulsivity.

Authors:  Vanessa M Brown; Jiazhou Chen; Claire M Gillan; Rebecca B Price
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-13

Review 9.  The transition to compulsion in addiction.

Authors:  Christian Lüscher; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  A deep learning framework for neuroscience.

Authors:  Blake A Richards; Timothy P Lillicrap; Denis Therien; Konrad P Kording; Philippe Beaudoin; Yoshua Bengio; Rafal Bogacz; Amelia Christensen; Claudia Clopath; Rui Ponte Costa; Archy de Berker; Surya Ganguli; Colleen J Gillon; Danijar Hafner; Adam Kepecs; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Peter Latham; Grace W Lindsay; Kenneth D Miller; Richard Naud; Christopher C Pack; Panayiota Poirazi; Pieter Roelfsema; João Sacramento; Andrew Saxe; Benjamin Scellier; Anna C Schapiro; Walter Senn; Greg Wayne; Daniel Yamins; Friedemann Zenke; Joel Zylberberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.