Literature DB >> 3102211

Randomized controlled trial of very early continuous distending pressure in the management of preterm infants.

V K Han, D W Beverley, C Clarson, W O Sumabat, W A Shaheed, D G Brabyn, G W Chance.   

Abstract

Application of continuous distending pressure at birth (very early CDP) should stabilize the immature airways and reduce the severity of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. Eighty-two preterm infants of less than 32 weeks gestation were randomly assigned at birth to early treatment group (TG), in which CDP of 6 cm water pressure was applied at birth by the nasopharyngeal route (NP-CDP), or to control group (CG), in which CDP was applied when indicated for established criteria (pO2 less than 50 mmHg in FiO2 greater than 0.5). Characteristics of the infants in the two groups were comparable. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in the incidence of RDS. The course of RDS, and oxygen and ventilatory requirements also did not appear to be changed. In blood gas parameters of most of the time frames, no significant difference was found between the two groups when the results were analyzed according to the assigned group. When the results were analyzed separately for the infants who developed RDS, infants in TG appear to have fared worse from the therapy in terms of oxygenation, as indicated by significantly higher FiO2 (P less than 0.01) and lower a/A (P less than 0.01) values on the third day of the course of RDS, as compared to infants in CG. The incidence of complications was comparable in the two groups. Four infants from TG (9.3%) and one from CG (2.6%) died (P = NS). We conclude that VECDP by nasopharyngeal route does not reduce the incidence of RDS and does not appear to improve the outcome and may worsen the severity of RDS when compared to application of CDP for established criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102211     DOI: 10.1016/0378-3782(87)90097-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  To intubate or not--that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants.

Authors:  N Finer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Initial treatment of preterm infants--continuous positive airway pressure or ventilation?

Authors:  K E Lundstrøm
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Does the use of primary continuous positive airway pressure reduce the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in infants ≤32 weeks' gestation?

Authors:  Wendy H Yee; Jeanne Scotland; Yung Pham; Robert Finch
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Intra-gastric pressures in neonates receiving bubble CPAP.

Authors:  Prashant Tyagi; Neeraj Gupta; Akanksha Jain; Pramod Upadhyay; Jacob Puliyel
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Prophylactic or very early initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for preterm infants.

Authors:  Prema Subramaniam; Jacqueline J Ho; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-18

7.  Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  F Sandri; G Ancora; A Lanzoni; P Tagliabue; M Colnaghi; M L Ventura; M Rinaldi; I Mondello; P Gancia; G P Salvioli; M Orzalesi; F Mosca
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 8.  Safe paediatric intensive care. Part 1: Does more medical care lead to improved outcome?

Authors:  Bernhard Frey; Andrew Argent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Nasal high flow therapy in very low birth weight infants with mild respiratory distress syndrome: a single center experience.

Authors:  Antonio Di Mauro; Manuela Capozza; Sergio Cotugno; Silvio Tafuri; Francesco Paolo Bianchi; Federico Schettini; Raffaella Panza; Nicola Laforgia
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.