Literature DB >> 31020365

Breech presentation is associated with lower adolescent tibial bone strength.

J H Tobias1, A Sayers1, K C Deere1, A E P Heazell2, D A Lawlor3,4,5, A Ireland6.   

Abstract

We compared bone outcomes in adolescents with breech and cephalic presentation. Tibia bone mineral content, density, periosteal circumference, and cross-sectional moment of inertia were lower in breech presentation, and females with breech presentation had lower hip CSA. These findings suggest that prenatal loading may exert long-lasting influences on skeletal development.
INTRODUCTION: Breech position during pregnancy is associated with reduced range of fetal movement, and with lower limb joint stresses. Breech presentation at birth is associated with lower neonatal bone mineral content (BMC) and area, but it is unknown whether these associations persist into later life.
METHODS: We examined associations between presentation at onset of labor, and tibia and hip bone outcomes at age 17 years in 1971 participants (1062 females) from a UK prospective birth cohort that recruited > 15,000 pregnant women in 1991-1992. Cortical BMC, cross-sectional area (CSA) and bone mineral density (BMD), periosteal circumference, and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at 50% tibia length. Total hip BMC, bone area, BMD, and CSMI were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
RESULTS: In models adjusted for sex, age, maternal education, smoking, parity, and age, singleton/multiple births, breech presentation (n = 102) was associated with lower tibial cortical BMC (- 0.14SD, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.00), CSA (- 0.12SD, - 0.26 to 0.02), BMD (- 0.16SD, - 0.31 to - 0.01), periosteal circumference (- 0.14SD, - 0.27 to - 0.01), and CSMI (- 0.11SD, - 0.24 to 0.01). In females only, breech presentation was associated with lower hip CSA (- 0.24SD, - 0.43 to 0.00) but not with other hip outcomes. Additional adjustment for potential mediators (delivery method, birthweight, gestational age, childhood motor competence and adolescent height and body composition) did not substantially affect associations with either tibia or hip outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that prenatal skeletal loading may exert long-lasting influences on skeletal size and strength but require replication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALSPAC; Bone mass; Fetal movement; Osteoporosis; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31020365     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04945-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  51 in total

1.  Early motor development of breech- and cephalic-presenting infants.

Authors:  D J Bartlett; N B Okun; P J Byrne; J M Watt; M C Piper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Effects of motor physical therapy on bone mineralization in premature infants: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  C M Vignochi; E Miura; L H Canani
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Natural history of fetal position during pregnancy and risk of nonvertex delivery.

Authors:  Catherine Takacs Witkop; Jun Zhang; Wenyu Sun; James Troendle
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Clinical Review: Sex steroids and the periosteum--reconsidering the roles of androgens and estrogens in periosteal expansion.

Authors:  Dirk Vanderschueren; Katrien Venken; Jill Ophoff; Roger Bouillon; Steven Boonen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Physical activity when young provides lifelong benefits to cortical bone size and strength in men.

Authors:  Stuart J Warden; Sara M Mantila Roosa; Mariana E Kersh; Andrea L Hurd; Glenn S Fleisig; Marcus G Pandy; Robyn K Fuchs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Direct ultrasonographic measurement of femoral anteversion in newborns.

Authors:  T Hinderaker; A Uden; O Reikerås
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The Denver developmental screening test.

Authors:  W K Frankenburg; J B Dodds
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Is there an effect of prenatal breech position on locomotion at 2.5 years?

Authors:  Bianca Fong; Annick Ledebt; Robin Zwart; Johanna I P De Vries; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Cohort Profile: the 'children of the 90s'--the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.

Authors:  Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Effects of normal and abnormal loading conditions on morphogenesis of the prenatal hip joint: application to hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Mario Giorgi; Alessandra Carriero; Sandra J Shefelbine; Niamh C Nowlan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  1 in total

1.  Future Cardiovascular Risk may Vary by Fetal Presentation at Delivery.

Authors:  Takehiro Michikawa
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.928

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.