Literature DB >> 31020000

Predictors of successful endovascular treatment in severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Xiaoxu Yang1, Fang Wu1, Yuehong Liu1, Jiangang Duan2, Ran Meng3, Jian Chen4, Debiao Li5, Zhaoyang Fan5, Marc Fisher6, Qi Yang1,5, Xunming Ji4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the thrombus characteristics affecting the extent of recanalization to identify patients with severe cerebral venous sinus thrombus (CVT) more likely to benefit from endovascular therapy.
METHODS: Severe CVT patients scheduled for endovascular treatment were prospectively recruited into the study. Each thrombosed venous segment was evaluated regarding complete or partial recanalization based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after treatment. Magnetic resonance black-blood thrombus imaging (MRBTI) was performed 1 day before endovascular treatment. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the clot, age of the clot, and baseline volume of the clot were compared between the complete and partial recanalization groups. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between these clot characteristics and recanalization status.
RESULTS: Twenty-one CVT patients undergoing endovascular therapy were prospectively included. There were 110 thrombosed segments, 54 of these segments were completely recanalized after endovascular treatment. An acute clot sign (ACS) was found in 39 segments and a subacute clot sign (SCS) was found in 71 segments. There was no significant difference on baseline volume of the clot (1638.8 ± 1432.2 mm3 vs. 1957.5 ± 2056.1 mm3, P > 0.05) between the complete and partial recanalization groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that ACS on MRBTI was associated with complete recanalization (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.937, 95% confidence interval, 1.6-9.5).
INTERPRETATION: ACS can be used to predict complete recanalization in patients undergoing endovascular treatment. MRBTI provides a robust method to define clot composition and is potentially useful in selecting the most appropriate CVT patients for endovascular treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31020000      PMCID: PMC6469256          DOI: 10.1002/acn3.749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol        ISSN: 2328-9503            Impact factor:   4.511


Introduction

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a relatively uncommon cause of stroke with various presentations,1 which accounts for nearly 1% of all strokes. The reported incidence of CVT is 1.32 per 100,000 person‐years.2 Systemic anticoagulation has been regarded as the first‐line treatment for CVT.3 However, anticoagulation alone does not always dissolve large and extensive CVT in some patients.4 Endovascular intervention, including mechanical thrombectomy, thromboaspiration, or balloon venoplasty with or without intrasinus thrombolysis,5, 6 is an alternative option for patients who deteriorate despite the use of anticoagulation.7 Since the thrombus itself is the primary target of endovascular therapy, understanding its composition is essential for complete resolution of the clot. Imaging techniques can be used to evaluate clot composition and measure thrombus burden.8 CT and MR venography are indirect luminal imaging methods based on the venous flow perturbation caused by thrombi, but these techniques cannot stage and quantify the thrombus.9, 10 Magnetic resonance black‐blood thrombus imaging (MRBTI) has recently been proposed as a noninvasive imaging tool for direct thrombus imaging.11, 12 In the current study, we aimed to investigate thrombus characteristics affecting the extent of recanalization to identify severe CVT patients more likely to benefit from endovascular treatment.

Methods

Patients

Between May 2014 and March 2018, acute CVT patients with severe symptoms scheduled for endovascular treatment were prospectively recruited into the study.13, 14 Patients were included based on the following criteria: intracerebral hemorrhagic lesion due to CVT, mental status impairment, coma (Glasgow coma scale<9), thrombosis in the deep cerebral venous system or cortical venous thrombosis, intracranial hypertension, and papilledema after anticoagulant treatment. Severe CVT patients presenting with one or more of the above characteristics were included. Exclusion criteria included recurrent CVT, not agreeing to have endovascular treatment and a contraindication to MRI. MRBTI was performed 1 day before endovascular treatment. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and all protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Recanalization extent on DSA

All DSA images were independently interpreted by two interventional neurologists to determine the extent of recanalization. Each treated segment was graded as partial (residual luminal narrowing >50%) or complete recanalization (residual luminal narrowing <50%). Discrepancies were resolved by two readers in the consensus reading.

MRBTI imaging protocol

All MR studies were conducted on a 3.0T system (MAGNETOM Verio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a 32‐channel head coil for signal reception. Typical imaging parameters for MRBTI included: repetition time (TR) = 600 msec, echo time (TE) = 14 msec, spatial resolution = 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm3, scan time = 5 min.

MRBTI evaluation

All MRBTI images were blindly reviewed by two experienced neuroradiologists. The following segments were included: anterior (horizontal) superior sagittal sinus, posterior (vertical) superior sagittal sinus, inferior sagittal sinus, right transverse sinus, right sigmoid sinus, left transverse sinus, left sigmoid sinus, straight sinus, falcial sinus, veins of Galen, veins of Labbé, internal cerebral veins, Rosenthal vein, and cortical veins. Source images, multiplanar reformation, and minimum intensity projection images were used for evaluation. The signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of each thrombosed segment was measured and defined as the ratio of the thrombus signal intensity and the standard deviation of the background noise. Acute thrombi consisting of deoxyhemoglobin presented as an isointense signal on MRBTI which was defined as “acute clot sign (ACS)” and subacute thrombus which turns into methemoglobin (T1‐weighted is shorted) presented as hyperintense signal, defined as subacute clot sign (SCS) (Fig. 1). Baseline thrombus volume before endovascular treatment on MRBTI images was measured by commercial software (Vessel Analysis, China). Any discrepancies between the reviewers were resolved by consensus.
Figure 1

Schematic view of different stages of cerebral venous thrombus on MRBTI. MRBTI showed an acute clot sign (ACS) in the superior sagittal sinus (arrowhead). Acute thrombus with deoxyhemoglobin and less fibrin (A) and subacute thrombus with methemoglobin and more fibrin in superior sagittal sinus were demonstrated as a subacute clot sign (SCS) (B).

Schematic view of different stages of cerebral venous thrombus on MRBTI. MRBTI showed an acute clot sign (ACS) in the superior sagittal sinus (arrowhead). Acute thrombus with deoxyhemoglobin and less fibrin (A) and subacute thrombus with methemoglobin and more fibrin in superior sagittal sinus were demonstrated as a subacute clot sign (SCS) (B).

Outcome of endovascular therapy

The outcome of endovascular treatment was measured by the modified Rankin Score (mRS) 12 months after endovascular therapy. A good outcome was defined as mRS ≤ 2.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0 (IBM, USA). All continuous variables are presented as means ± SD. To compare the complete and partial recanalization groups, categorical variables were analyzed using a chi‐squared test and continuous variables were compared using an independent‐samples T test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to define independent factors to predict complete recanalization. The interobserver agreement in ACS and SCS quantification, and baseline thrombus volume measurement were evaluated by Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results

Patient characteristics

From May 2014 to March 2018, 27 CVT patients scheduled for endovascular treatment were recruited. Three patients with recurrent CVT, two patients who rejected endovascular treatment, and one patient with claustrophobia were excluded. Twenty‐one CVT patients were finally included into the study (12 female, age 32.5 ± 9.8). The baseline characteristics of patients were summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients

n/N (%)
Demographics
Mean, age, y (SD)32.5±9.8
Gender, female (%)12 (57.1)
Clinical characteristics (%)
Headache20 (95.2)
Vomit 11 (52.4)
Seizure7 (33.3)
Tinnitus1 (4.8)
Weakness2 (9.5)
Visual‐field defects4 (19.0)
Disturbance of consciousness8 (38.1)
Location of thrombus
Superior sagittal sinus16 (76.2)
Transverse sinus19 (90.5)
Sigmoid sinus17 (81.0)
Cortical and deep cerebral venous system14 (66.1)
Baseline characteristics of patients

Thrombosed segments and extent of recanalization

In total, 110 thrombosed segments were identified from 21 CVT patients. Five acute patients achieved complete recanalization (5/7, 71.4%) and nine subacute patient achieved partial recanalization (9/14, 64.3%). At a segment level, complete recanalization occurred in 54 segments and partial recanalization in 56 segments. There was a significant difference in the complete recanalization rates between acute clots and subacute clots (P < 0.001). Nineteen thrombosed segments were in the superior sagittal sinus, 22 in the transverse sinus, 19 in the sigmoid sinus, and 32 in the cortical or deep venous system. The rate of complete recanalization was 42.1% (8/19) in the superior sagittal sinus, 40.9% (9/22) in the transverse sinus, 31.6% (6/19) in the sigmoid sinus, and 40.6% (13/32) in the cortical and deep venous system.

Interobserver agreement on MRBTI characteristics evaluation

The interobserver reproducibility for the presence of ACS, SCS, and baseline thrombus volume measurement had К values of 0.93, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively.

Comparison of clot characteristics

There was a significant difference in the SNR of CVT clot between the complete and partial recanalization groups (120.5 ± 47.2 vs. 169.3 ± 80.5, P < 0.001). ACS was detected in 39 segments and SCS were found in 71 segments. There were no significant differences in baseline thrombus volume between the partial and complete recanalization groups (1638.8 ± 1432.2 vs. 1957.5 ± 2056.1 mm3, P > 0.05). Figures 2 and 3 showed representative CVT patients with complete recanalization and partial recanalization, respectively.
Figure 2

Complete recanalization of a 35 years old, male CVT patient underwent endovascular treatment. MRBTI images showed an acute clot sign (ACS) in the superior sagittal sinus (white arrows). Follow‐up MRBTI demonstrated complete recanalization (white arrows). Baseline and follow‐up thrombus volume was measured semi‐automatically by commercial software (Vessel Analysis). DSA confirmed recanalization of superior sagittal sinus.

Figure 3

Partial recanalization of a 40 years old, male CVT patient underwent endovascular treatment. Subacute clot sign (SCS) in the superior sagittal sinus and straight sinus indicated subacute thrombus (white arrows). Follow‐up MRBTI image depicted partial recanalization (red arrows). DSA showed partial recanalization of superior sagittal sinus.

Complete recanalization of a 35 years old, male CVT patient underwent endovascular treatment. MRBTI images showed an acute clot sign (ACS) in the superior sagittal sinus (white arrows). Follow‐up MRBTI demonstrated complete recanalization (white arrows). Baseline and follow‐up thrombus volume was measured semi‐automatically by commercial software (Vessel Analysis). DSA confirmed recanalization of superior sagittal sinus. Partial recanalization of a 40 years old, male CVT patient underwent endovascular treatment. Subacute clot sign (SCS) in the superior sagittal sinus and straight sinus indicated subacute thrombus (white arrows). Follow‐up MRBTI image depicted partial recanalization (red arrows). DSA showed partial recanalization of superior sagittal sinus.

Multivariate analysis

Logistic regression analysis showed that ACS was associated with complete recanalization (P < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 3.937 (95% confidence interval, 1.6–9.5). SCS was associated with partial recanalization (P = 0.001), with an odds ratio of 4.237 (95% confidence interval, 1.7–10.3). The baseline volume of thrombus was not associated with complete recanalization (P = 0.363) (Table 2).
Table 2

MRBTI characteristics of two groups

MRBTI characteristicsUnivariateMultivariate
Complete recanalizationPartial recanalization P valueOR95% CI P value
No. of thrombosed segments54 (49.1)56 (50.9)
SNR120.5 ± 47.2169.3 ± 80.5<0.001
Clot age
ACS33 (64.1)6 (10.7)<0.0013.9371.6–9.50.002
SCS21 (38.9)50 (89.3)<0.0014.2371.7–10.30.001
Baseline thrombus volume1638.8 ± 1432.21957.5 ± 2056.10.0550.363

MRBTI, Magnetic resonance black‐blood imaging; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ACS, acute clot sign; SCS, subacute clot sign.

MRBTI characteristics of two groups MRBTI, Magnetic resonance black‐blood imaging; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; ACS, acute clot sign; SCS, subacute clot sign. All twenty‐one patients underwent endovascular treatment had good prognosis at 1 year follow up (mRS, 2.15 ± 1.3 vs. 0.42 ± 0.84, P < 0.001).

Discussion

This is the first study investigating the association between clot age and recanalization using MRBTI in patients with severe CVT undergoing endovascular therapy. Our study showed that ACS on MRBTI was independently associated with complete recanalization. Understanding the age of the thrombus can help to determine the benefits and risks of treatment, as well as the likelihood of treatment success. MRBTI, as a reasonably new technique, is a targeted‐thrombus imaging method.15 It has an inherent black‐blood effect and superior signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) performance. The black‐blood image contrast in MRBTI allows thrombi to be visually isolated within the dark lumen of venous sinuses. Configured as a T1‐weighted acquisition, BTI is particularly useful for the detection of subacute CVT that is rich in short‐T1 methemoglobins and thus appears hyperintense with respect to surrounding brain parenchyma and sinus lumen. Although anticoagulant is the primary treatment, it may fail in some severe CVT patients. Endovascular treatment can be considered as an alternative therapeutic option in patients with worsening symptoms of CVT to potentially reduce mortality.16, 17, 18, 19 A recent study reported that the complete recanalization rate after endovascular treatment was 61% with or without systemic anticoagulant.20 In our study, the complete recanalization rate is lower than in that study (10/21, 47.6%). However, both on a segment level and patient level, the complete recanalization rate in the group with the acute clot sign (ACS) was higher than in the subacute group with a subacute clot sign (SCS) (84.6% vs. 29.6%, 71.4% vs. 35.7%, respectively). Selection of an effective therapy depends on many factors including the accurate determination of thrombus age and maturity.15 Thus, there is a growing need to develop better, novel minimally invasive imaging techniques, and diagnostic tools to accurately determine clot age in CVT and improve the recanalization rate.21 Hemoglobin in the thrombus changes from deoxyhemoglobin to methemoglobin in parallel to the duration of symptoms which can be used as imaging target.22, 23 MRBTI with hyper T1 weighting can differentiate acute clot and subacute clot thrombus based on their intrinsic MR signal intensity characteristics. Thrombus composition is a factor in determining susceptibility to mechanical clot disruption and thus the degree of successful recanalization.24, 25 The acute clot is easier to completely recanalize because it primarily consists of red blood cells. Then, they become mechanically less compliant due to fibrin cross linking and collagen deposition over time. Subacute or chronic thrombi, which are rich in collagen and cross‐linked fibrin, harden and are more difficult to disrupt.26 Previous studies have reported that a thrombosed sinus will be quickly recanalized and CVT patients can obtain a good prognosis after endovascular treatment. Furthermore, it is very important to look for a characteristic to predict extensive recanalization. In this study, we found that patients with ACS on MRBTI can predict complete recanalization. There were several limitations in the current study. First, with relatively low prevalence of CVT, the present study only recruited a limited number of patients who failed anticoagulation therapy and underwent endovascular treatment. Future large‐scale multicenter studies are needed to further validate our findings. Second, we need to investigate the association between MRBTI findings with different type of endovascular treatment techniques with multivariable regression analysis. Our classification of clot types is imperfect because precise interpretation of thrombus composition may need multi contrast MR sequences which were not performed in the current study due to scan time constrain. For example, the acute stage of thrombus formation on T2‐weighted images appears strongly hypointense and a subacute thrombus appears hyperintense which may help to better define the clot stage.27 Finally, we did not perform pathology on the retrieved clots. Collagen rich chronic thrombi have proven more difficult to treat and need to be investigated more completely in the future. In conclusion, the ACS on MRBTI can be used to predict complete recanalization in CVT patients having endovascular treatment. MRBTI may improve efficacy of current endovascular treatments for CVT and help to reduce adverse outcomes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Vascular brain pathologies.

Authors:  Ajay Garg
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Comparison of CT venography with MR venography in cerebral sinovenous thrombosis.

Authors:  N Khandelwal; Ajay Agarwal; Rohit Kochhar; J R Bapuraj; Paramjeet Singh; S Prabhakar; S Suri
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Critical review of mouse models of venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jose A Diaz; Andrea T Obi; Daniel D Myers; Shirley K Wrobleski; Peter K Henke; Nigel Mackman; Thomas W Wakefield
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 4.  Imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis: current techniques, spectrum of findings, and diagnostic pitfalls.

Authors:  James L Leach; Robert B Fortuna; Blaise V Jones; Mary F Gaskill-Shipley
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  The incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jonathan M Coutinho; Susanna M Zuurbier; Majid Aramideh; Jan Stam
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Occurrence of post-acute recanalization and collateral formation in patients with cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis. A serial venographic study.

Authors:  Abeer Farrag; Muna Irfan; Gaurav K Guliani; Nauman Tariq; Robert A Taylor; M Fareed K Suri; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  EFNS guideline on the treatment of cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in adult patients.

Authors:  K Einhäupl; J Stam; M-G Bousser; S F T M De Bruijn; J M Ferro; I Martinelli; F Masuhr
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.089

8.  Safety and validity of mechanical thrombectomy and thrombolysis on severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Authors:  Guangwen Li; Xianwei Zeng; Mohammed Hussain; Ran Meng; Yi Liu; Kevin Yuan; Chaitanya Sikharam; Yuchuan Ding; Feng Ling; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Direct thrombolysis for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Authors:  Maryam Rahman; Gregory J Velat; Brian L Hoh; J Mocco
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Influence of recanalization on outcome in dural sinus thrombosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Susan Trittmacher; Anousha Rahimi; Tibo Gerriets; Carina Röttger; Ralf Siekmann; Manfred Kaps
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison Between the Diagnostic Performance of 1.5 T and 3.0 T field Strengths for Detecting Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Magnetic Resonance Black-Blood Thrombus Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Ye; Xueping He; Chen Huang; Caiyun Shi; Wei Deng; Wenfeng Luo; Jianke Liang; Zhuonan He; Huan Mao; Qiwei Liang; Dongya Chen; Hanwei Chen; Guoxi Xie
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Successful treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis by balloon venoplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Wen-Jing Gu; Ming-Chao Shi; De-Rui Kong; Ke-Xin Zhao; Hong-Wei Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 3.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vein and Venous Sinus Thrombosis-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Philipp Bücke; Victoria Hellstern; Alexandru Cimpoca; José E Cohen; Thomas Horvath; Oliver Ganslandt; Hansjörg Bäzner; Hans Henkes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Inflammation and Severe Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.

Authors:  Shuyuan Hu; Hangil Lee; Haiping Zhao; Yuchuan Ding; Jiangang Duan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Deep Learning for Accurate Segmentation of Venous Thrombus from Black-Blood Magnetic Resonance Images: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Chuanqi Sun; Xiangyu Xiong; Tianjing Zhang; Xiuhong Guan; Huan Mao; Jing Yang; Xiaoyong Zhang; Yi Sun; Hao Chen; Guoxi Xie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.