Literature DB >> 31019785

Development and validation of a predictive model for the diagnosis of solid solitary pulmonary nodules using data mining methods.

Yangwei Xiang1, Yifeng Sun1, Yuan Liu2, Baohui Han3, Qunhui Chen4, Xiaodan Ye4, Li Zhu4, Wen Gao1,5, Wentao Fang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to develop a predictive model to accurately predict the malignancy of solid solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) by data mining methods.
METHODS: A training cohort of 388 consecutive patients with solid SPNs was used to develop a predictive model to evaluate the malignancy of solid SPNs. By using SPSS Modeler, we utilized logistic regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM) classifiers to build predictive models. Another cohort of 200 consecutive patients with solid SPNs was used to verify the accuracy of the predictive model. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics between the training cohort and the validation cohort. The AUCs of LR, ANN, KNN, RF, and SVM models for the validation cohort were 0.874±0.0280 (P=0.605), 0.833±0.0351 (P=0.104), 0.792±0.0418 (P=0.014), 0.775±0.0400 (P=0.013), and 0.890±0.0323 (reference), respectively. The SVM algorithm had the highest AUC, and the best sensitivity (90.3%), specificity (80.4%), positive predictive value (93.9%), negative predictive value (71.2%) and accuracy (88.0%) for the validation cohort among the five models.
CONCLUSIONS: Data mining by SVM might be a useful auxiliary algorithm in predicting malignancy of solid SPNs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; data mining; solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31019785      PMCID: PMC6462724          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  32 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. The solitary pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  David Ost; Alan M Fein; Steven H Feinsilver
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The solitary pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  A W K Tang; H A Moss; R J H Robertson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

4.  Development and validation of diagnostic prediction model for solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Kan Yonemori; Ukihide Tateishi; Hajime Uno; Yoko Yonemori; Koji Tsuta; Masahiro Takeuchi; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Hisao Asamura; Masahiko Kusumoto
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.424

5.  Development and validation of a clinical prediction model to estimate the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules in Chinese people.

Authors:  Yun Li; Ke-Zhong Chen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Rosna Mirtcheva; Georgeann McGuinness; Dorothy McCauley; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Lakshmi Ananth; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in surgically resected clinical stage I patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Sawabata; Mitsunori Ohta; Shin-ichi Takeda; Hirotsugu Hirano; Yoshitomo Okumura; Hiroki Asada; Hajime Maeda
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection.

Authors:  Joseph O Ogutu; Hans-Peter Piepho; Torben Schulz-Streeck
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-05-27
View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of a machine learning-based multimode diagnosis system for lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuyin Duan; Huimin Cao; Hong Liu; Lijun Miao; Jing Wang; Xiaolei Zhou; Wei Wang; Pingzhao Hu; Lingbo Qu; Yongjun Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Nomogram For The Prediction Of Malignancy In Small (8-20 mm) Indeterminate Solid Solitary Pulmonary Nodules In Chinese Populations.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Chen; Rui-Ying Yan; Ke Zhao; Da-Fu Zhang; Ya-Jun Li; Lin Wu; Xing-Xiang Dong; Ying Chen; De-Pei Gao; Ying-Ying Ding; Xi-Cai Wang; Zhen-Hui Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  [Advances and Clinical Application of Malignant Probability Prediction Models for 
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule].

Authors:  Zhaojue Wang; Jing Zhao; Mengzhao Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-08-30

4.  Diagnostic Performance of 2D and 3D T2WI-Based Radiomics Features With Machine Learning Algorithms to Distinguish Solid Solitary Pulmonary Lesion.

Authors:  Qi Wan; Jiaxuan Zhou; Xiaoying Xia; Jianfeng Hu; Peng Wang; Yu Peng; Tianjing Zhang; Jianqing Sun; Yang Song; Guang Yang; Xinchun Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Lung cancer risk prediction models based on pulmonary nodules: A systematic review.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Fei Wang; Wei Cao; Chao Qin; Xuesi Dong; Zhuoyu Yang; Yadi Zheng; Zilin Luo; Liang Zhao; Yiwen Yu; Yongjie Xu; Jiang Li; Wei Tang; Sipeng Shen; Ning Wu; Fengwei Tan; Ni Li; Jie He
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Li Yang; Qinqin Liu; Qiuli Zhao; Xuemei Zhu; Ling Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.