| Literature DB >> 31019193 |
Sumiyo Watanabe1,2,3, Kotaro Hayashi4, Kazuko Toh4, Hyun Jin Kim1, Xueying Liu4, Hiroyuki Chaya1,5, Shigeto Fukushima4, Keisuke Katsushima6, Yutaka Kondo6, Satoshi Uchida7, Satomi Ogura4,5, Takahiro Nomoto8, Hiroyasu Takemoto8, Horacio Cabral7, Hiroaki Kinoh4, Hiroyoshi Y Tanaka9, Mitsunobu R Kano9,10, Yu Matsumoto1, Hiroshi Fukuhara11, Shunya Uchida2, Masaomi Nangaku3, Kensuke Osada7, Nobuhiro Nishiyama8, Kanjiro Miyata12,13, Kazunori Kataoka14,15.
Abstract
Stabilisation of fragile oligonucleotides, typically small interfering RNA (siRNA), is one of the most critical issues for oligonucleotide therapeutics. Many previous studies encapsulated oligonucleotides into ~100-nm nanoparticles. However, such nanoparticles inevitably accumulate in liver and spleen. Further, some intractable cancers, e.g., tumours in pancreas and brain, have inherent barrier characteristics preventing the penetration of such nanoparticles into tumour microenvironments. Herein, we report an alternative approach to cancer-targeted oligonucleotide delivery using a Y-shaped block catiomer (YBC) with precisely regulated chain length. Notably, the number of positive charges in YBC is adjusted to match that of negative charges in each oligonucleotide strand (i.e., 20). The YBC rendezvouses with a single oligonucleotide in the bloodstream to generate a dynamic ion-pair, termed unit polyion complex (uPIC). Owing to both significant longevity in the bloodstream and appreciably small size (~18 nm), the uPIC efficiently delivers oligonucleotides into pancreatic tumour and brain tumour models, exerting significant antitumour activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019193 PMCID: PMC6482185 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09856-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Construction and characterisation of uPIC from siRNA and YBC. a Schematic illustration of uPIC formation from the single siRNA and the dyad of YBCs through charge-matched ion-pairing. b Agarose gel retardation analysis of PIC samples prepared at varying A/P ratios. c Zeta potentials of PIC samples prepared at varying A/P ratios, determined by electrophoretic laser scattering. Data represent the means ± s.d. for three replicate measurements. d Hydrodynamic diameter of A647-siRNA complexed with YBC at varying A/P ratios, and the corresponding association number of siRNA per PIC, determined by FCS. Data represent the means ± s.d. for five replicate measurements. e Molecular weight histograms of free siRNA, free YBC, and uPIC prepared at an A/P ratio of 1, determined by a sedimentation velocity method in AUC
Fig. 2Dynamic and precise ion-pairing (rendezvous) of an siRNA with free YBCs. a Schematic illustration of the FRET-based analysis of dynamic ion-pairing of siRNA with free YBC (or the exchange reaction between uPIC-forming YBC and free YBC). b FRET analysis of uPIC formation and exchange reaction in buffer solution. c–e IVCLSM images of blood vessels in the mouse ear dermis treated with a stepwise systemic injection of A594-YBC (c), A647-siRNA (d), and N-YBC (e). The scale bars indicate 50 µm. f Time-dependent changes in the FRET signal obtained by quantitative analysis of the IVCLSM images acquired after A594-YBC injection. Left and right arrows indicate the injection of A647-siRNA and non-labelled YBC (N-YBC), respectively. g Sample preparation scheme for the comparative study of uPIC formation under varying conditions. h Hydrodynamic diameters of A647-siRNA complexed with YBC under varying conditions. Data represent the means ± s.d. for five replicate measurements
Fig. 3Blood circulation and tumour accumulation profiles of uPIC. a–d IVCLSM images of circulating A647-siRNA in the blood vessels of the mouse ear dermis. Naked A647-siRNA at 30 s (a) and 60 min (b) after systemic injection. A647-siRNA/uPIC (A/P = 10) at 30 s (c) and 60 min (d) after systemic injection. The scale bars indicate 100 µm. e Time-dependent change in A647 fluorescence obtained by quantitatively analysing the IVCLSM images. f Time-dependent change in the FRET signal in the vein of the mouse ear dermis after systemic injection of FRET-siRNA/uPIC. g Biodistribution of naked Cy5-siRNA and Cy5-siRNA/uPIC 48 h after systemic administration. Fluorescence intensities were normalised to those obtained from naked siRNA. Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 4. h Time-dependent tumour accumulation profiles of naked Cy5-siRNA, uPIC, and Invivofectamine® LNP. The fluorescence intensity was obtained from the regions of interest (ROI) in the continuous IVCLSM images (Supplementary Fig. 11a–c). i–k Spatial profiling of fluorescence intensity derived from Cy5-siRNA in tumour tissues at the initial stage (dashed line) and 10 h (solid line) after systemic administration of naked siRNA (i), uPIC (j), and LNP (k). The fluorescence intensities were measured along the direction of the white arrow in the IVCLSM image inset (red: Cy5-siRNA; green: GFP-BxPC3 cells; scale bar: 100 µm) and normalised to the maximum value obtained at the initial stage. The cancer cell nest region was identified by GFP fluorescence derived from cancer cells, as depicted by the dashed line in the IVCLSM image inset. l, m Subcellular distribution of naked Cy5-siRNA (l) or Cy5-siRNA/uPIC (m). The circular voids are cellular nuclei identified from the nuclei-stained CLSM image inset. The scale bars indicate 20 µm. n Cellular uptake efficiency of siRNA in a spheroid culture of BxPC3 cells. The cellular uptake efficiency was determined by qRT-PCR as the amount of Argonaute 2-bound siRNA (or antisense strand) and normalised to the value obtained from the cells treated with naked siRNA. Data represent the means ± s.d. n = 3
Fig. 4Gene silencing and therapeutic effects of uPIC. a PLK1 mRNA level in tumour tissues harvested from subcutaneous BxPC3 tumour-bearing mice intravenously injected twice with uPIC at 24-h intervals. Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 5 for siLuc/uPIC and 10 for sihPLK1/uPIC. b, c PLK1 protein level in the tumour tissues harvested from subcutaneous BxPC3 tumour-bearing mice intravenously injected with PBS, uPIC, Invivofectamine® LNP, and naked sihPLK1 thrice at 24-h intervals, as determined by western blotting (b), and the quantified results (c). Data represent the means ± s.d. n = 3. d–h Apoptosis in subcutaneous BxPC3 tumour tissues from mice treated with sihPLK1/uPIC (d), siLuc/uPIC (e), naked sihPLK1 (f), or PBS (g) based on a TUNEL assay (red: apoptosis-positive cells; blue: cell nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342; scale bar: 100 µm), and the quantified results (h). Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 4. i Antitumour activity of uPIC intravenously administered multiple times (as shown by black arrows) to BxPC3 tumour-bearing mice. Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 7. j Body weight change in tumour-bearing mice treated with uPIC as described in (i). Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 7. k RNAi effect of uPIC in a spontaneous pancreatic tumour model. The luminescence intensity from luciferase-expressing pancreatic tumours was determined using an IVIS instrument 24 h after single systemic injection into oncomice and normalised to that obtained from the initial value before injection. Data represent the means ± s.e.m. n = 9–11. l Kaplan–Meier survival curves of non-treated oncomice and oncomice treated with simPLK1/uPIC or siScr/uPIC. n = 10. m Number of oncomice with liver metastases at the designated days
Blood laboratory data for mice at 48 h after five systemic administrations (mean ± s.e.m. n = 5)
| T.P. (g dL–1) | Alb. (g dL–1) | BUN (mg dL–1) | Cr. (mg dL–1) | Na (mEQ L–1) | T.bil (mg dL–1) | T.C. (mg dL–1) | AST (IU L–1) | ALT (IU L–1) | LDH (IU L–1) | ALP (IU L–1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 0 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 152 ± 2 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 120 ± 3 | 52 ± 3 | 66 ± 9 | 229 ± 29 | 525 ± 13 |
| uPIC | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 19 ± 1 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 153 ± 2 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 113 ± 2 | 50 ± 2 | 59 ± 5 | 227 ± 32 | 462 ± 10 |
T.P. total protein, Alb albumin, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Cr: creatinine, T.bil total bilirubin, T.C. total cholesterol, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALP alkaline phosphatase
Blood counts of mice at 48 h after five systemic administrations (mean ± s.e.m. n = 5)
| WBC (g dL–1) | Neut (%) | Lymph (%) | Mono (%) | Eo (%) | Baso (%) | Hb (g dL–1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | 4800 ± 400 | 23 ± 1 | 71 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 16 ± 0 |
| uPIC | 5200 ± 600 | 19 ± 1 | 75 ± 1 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 15 ± 0 |
WBC white blood cell, Neut neutrophil, Lymph lymphocyte, Mono monocyte, Eo eosinophil, Baso basophil, Hb haemoglobin
Fig. 5Delivery performances of ASO/uPIC. a Time-dependent accumulation profiles of naked A647-ASO and A647-ASO/uPIC (A/P = 20) in a patient-derived orthotopic brain tumour model, as measured by IVIS. Data represent the means ± s.d. n = 3. b TUG1 expression level in brain tumour tissue. Data represent the means ± s.d. n = 3. c Representative HE-stained whole brain sections at 4 weeks after treatment by intravenous injection of asLuc/ or asTUG1/uPIC. The tumour areas are surrounded by the red dotted line. Scale bars indicate 1 mm. d Tumour volumes at 4 weeks after treatment by intravenous injection of asLuc/ or asTUG1/uPIC. Data represent the means ± s.d. n = 3. e Kaplan–Meier survival curves of orthotopic brain tumour model mice treated with asTUG1/uPIC or asLuc/uPIC. uPIC samples (25 µg ASO per mouse) were intravenously administrated every three days (total 10 doses). n = 10