| Literature DB >> 31016607 |
Jun Young Chang1, Seung Chul Ahn2, Jung Sub Lee3, Jee-Young Kim4, A-Ra Jung2, Jaeseon Park5, Jong-Woo Choi5, Seung Do Yu2.
Abstract
Among the results of community health impact assessments completed in 2014, residents of the Indae abandoned metal mine area showed high average urinary concentrations of harmful arsenic (As), at 148.9 µg/L. The concentration of harmful As was derived as the sum of As(V), As(III), MMA, and DMA concentrations known to be toxic. In this area, mining hazard prevention work was not carried out and the pollution source was neglected, and the health effect of the residents due to arsenic exposure was concerned. We re-assessed As exposure levels and tried to identify exposure factors for residents of this area. Analysis of the soil, sediment, and river water to assess the association between the soil of the Indae abandoned metal mine area and the soil in residential areas confirmed a correlation between Pb and As concentrations in the soil. Since Pb and As behave similarly, the use of the stable Pb isotope ratio for assessment of the pollution source tracking was validated. In the 3-isotope plot (207/206Pb vs. 208/206Pb) of soil samples in this area, a stable Pb isotope ratio was located on the same trend line, which confirmed that the soil in the residential area was within the area of influence of the Indae abandoned metal mine. Therefore, we judged that the pollution source of As was the Indae abandoned metal mine. The results by As species were As (III) 1.45 μg/L, As (V) 0.74 μg/L, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) 2.43 μg/L, dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) 27.63 μg/L, and arsenobetaine 88.62 μg/L. The urinary harmful As was 31.92 μg/L, much lower than the 148.9 μg/L reported in a 2014 survey, due to the implementation of a multi-regional water supply in November 2014 that restricted As exposure through drinking river water. However, concerns remain over chronic exposure to As because As in river water used for farming and in agricultural soil still exceeds environmental standards; thus, ongoing work to address hazards from former mining areas and continued environmental monitoring is necessary.Entities:
Keywords: Abandoned metal mine; Arsenic; Exposure assessment; Stable Pb isotope ratio
Year: 2019 PMID: 31016607 PMCID: PMC6856293 DOI: 10.1007/s10653-019-00296-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Geochem Health ISSN: 0269-4042 Impact factor: 4.609
Fig. 1Study area and sampling sites
Fig. 2Sites in the Indae abandoned metal mines area exceeding the environmental standards for As
Questionnaire survey items
| Category | Factors |
|---|---|
| Personal information | Name, sex, birth data, age |
| Occupation and exposure history | Past and recent occupation, heavy metal exposure status, residence period in mine area, pesticide use status |
| Abandoned mine experience | Working experience, working period |
| Smoking and drinking | Smoking habits, alcohol consumption habits |
| Disease history | Diagnosis of chronic disease, acute disease and cancer |
| Dietary habits | Drinking water type, the self-sufficiency rate of agricultural products, seafood intake and frequency, status of seafood intake during the last week |
Basic characteristics of the surveyed participants in the area around Indae abandoned metal mines
| Factors | Male ( | Female ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agea (years) | 66.13 ± 10.15 | 67.35 ± 11.82 | 66.76 ± 10.96 |
| Residence period | |||
| < 40 | 7 (29.2) | 12 (46.2) | 19 (38.0) |
| 40–59 | 4 (16.7) | 4 (15.4) | 8 (16.0) |
| ≥ 60 | 13 (54.2) | 10 (38.5) | 23 (46.0) |
| AM ± SDa (year) | 47.00 ± 25.97 | 40.54 ± 28.13 | 43.64 ± 27.04 |
| Occupation | |||
| Sales worker | 2 (8.3) | 1 (3.8) | 3 (6.0) |
| Farmer | 20 (83.3) | 17 (65.4) | 37 (74.0) |
| Housewife | – | 3 (11.5) | 3 (6.0) |
| Unemployed | 2 (8.3) | 5 (19.2) | 7 (14.0) |
| Abandoned mine experience | |||
| Working experience (yes) | 3 (12.5) | 2 (7.7) | 5 (10.0) |
| Working period (years) | 8.83 ± 13.57 | 0.63 ± 0.53 | 5.55 ± 10.60 |
| Smoking habits | |||
| Current | 5 (20.8) | 1 (3.8) | 6 (12.0) |
| Past | 13 (54.2) | 2 (7.7) | 15.(30.0) |
| Never smoked | 6 (25.0) | 23 (88.5) | 29 (58.0) |
| Alcohol consumption habits | |||
| Current | 17 (70.8) | 16 (61.5) | 33 (66.0) |
| Past | 4 (16.7) | 1 (3.8) | 5 (10.0) |
| Never consumed | 3 (12.5) | 9 (34.6) | 12 (24.0) |
| Pesticide use | |||
| Used (yes) | 21 (87.5) | 17 (65.4) | 38 (76.0) |
| Average perioda (year) | 28.59 ± 18.02 | 23.15 ± 14.67 | 26.23 ± 16.60 |
Unit: person (%)
aAM ± SD, arithmetic mean ± standard deviation
Dietary questionnaire results of participants residing around the Indae abandoned metal mine
| Factors | Male ( | Female ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drinking water type (before Nov. 2014) | |||
| Tap/mineral water | 1 (4.2) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (4.0) |
| Simple water supply | 23 (95.8) | 25 (96.2) | 48 (96.0) |
| Perioda (year) | 39.74 ± 24.84 | 31.32 ± 24.05 | 35.76 ± 24.49 |
| Current drinking water type | |||
| Tap/mineral water | 18 (75.0) | 18 (69.2) | 36 (72.0) |
| Simple water supply | 6 (25.0) | 8 (30.8) | 14 (28.0) |
| Rice | |||
| All self-sufficiency | 19 (79.2) | 20 (76.9) | 39 (78.0) |
| Some purchase | 1 (4.2) | 2 (7.7) | 3 (6.0) |
| All purchase | 4 (16.7) | 4 (15.4) | 8 (16.0) |
| Fish intake frequency | |||
| < 1 time/week | 16 (66.7) | 20 (76.9) | 36 (72.0) |
| Over 2 times/week | 8 (33.3) | 6 (23.1) | 14 (28.0) |
| Fish intake | |||
| < 1 | 16 (66.7) | 18 (69.2) | 34 (68.0) |
| More than one | 8 (33.3) | 8 (30.8) | 16 (32.0) |
| Seaweed intake frequency | |||
| < 1 time/week | 19 (79.2) | 21 (80.8) | 40 (80.0) |
| Over 2 times/week | 5 (20.8) | 5 (19.2) | 10 (20.0) |
| Eat seafood during the last week (yes) | 19 (79.2) | 20 (76.9) | 39 (78.0) |
| Eat seafood during the last 3 days (yes) | 14 (58.3) | 19 (73.1) | 33 (66.0) |
| Ingested seafood: fish, shellfish, shrimp | 8 (57.1) | 7 (36.8) | 15 (45.5) |
| Ingested seafood: seaweed | 13 (92.9) | 18 (94.7) | 31 (93.9) |
| Ingested seafood: fish and seaweed | 7 (53.8) | 6 (33.3) | 13 (41.9) |
Unit: person (%)
aAM ± SD, arithmetic mean ± standard deviation
Arsenic concentrations in environmental samples taken from the area around the Indae abandoned metal mines
| Factors | As concentration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM ± SDa | Median | Min–Max | ||
| Soil | ||||
| Pithead (mg/kg) | 10 | 9144.2 ± 8509.1 | 10233.0 | 64.1–25236.1 |
| River sediment (mg/kg) | 9 | 1759.8 ± 2734.1 | 578.9 | 96.9–7357.2 |
| Agricultural land (mg/kg) | 27 | 22.4 ± 11.3 | 21.5 | 5.7–56.3 |
| Water | ||||
| Pithead (mg/L) | 5 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0–0.4 |
| River water (mg/L) | 22 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.0–1.8 |
| Drinking Water (μg/L) | 4 | NDb | NDb | NDb |
| Rice grain (mg/kg) | 20 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.1–0.3 |
aArithmetic mean ± standard deviation
bNot detected
Sediments and soils sites exceeding the environmental standards for As
| Sample | Sampling site | Class | As concentration (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sediment | Waste rock 1 | Area 2 | |
| Waste rock 2 | Area 2 | ||
| Waste rock 3 | Area 2 | ||
| Waste rock 4 | Area 2 | ||
| Waste rock 5 | Area 2 | ||
| Erosion-control dam 1 | Area 2 | ||
| Erosion-control dam 2 | Area 2 | ||
| Erosion-control dam 3 | Area 2 | ||
| Erosion-control dam 4 | Area 2 | ||
| Erosion-control dam 5 | Area 2 | ||
| Floodgate | Area 2 | ||
| Stream 1 | Area 2 | ||
| Stream 2 | Area 2 | ||
| Stream 3 | Area 2 | ||
| Soil | Waste rock 6 | Area 2 | |
| Waste rock 7 | Area 2 | ||
| Pithead 1 | Area 2 | ||
| Pithead 2 | Area 2 | ||
| Pithead 3 | Area 2 | ||
| Field 1 | Area 1 | ||
| Paddy 1 | Area 1 | ||
| Field 2 | Area 1 | ||
| Field 3 | Area 1 | ||
| Paddy 2 | Area 1 | ||
| Field 4 | Area 1 | ||
| Paddy 3 | Area 1 | ||
| Paddy 4 | Area 1 | ||
| Field 5 | Area 1 | ||
| Worrisome levels of soil contamination | Area 1 | 25 | |
| Area 2 | 50 | ||
| Countermeasure levels of soil contamination | Area 1 | 75 | |
| Area 2 | 150 | ||
Bold and italics indicate samples that exceeded the countermeasure and worrisome levels of soil contamination in Korea, respectively
aArea 1: Dry paddy, paddy, orchard, and ranch; mineral spring land; open field (residential); school use and parkland; historic sites; burial grounds; and playgrounds
bArea 2: Forest/salt farm/open field (non-residential); mixed-use land including warehouses, rivers, public land, sports-use, recreation-use, and religious-use
Sites exceeding the water quality standard of As
| Sampling site | Standarda (mg/L) | As (mg/L) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waste rock 1 | 0.05 | 0.392 | 650 m above sea level |
| Waste rock 2 | 0.05 | 0.342 | 650 m above sea level |
| Waste rock 3 | 0.05 | 0.260 | 600 m above sea level |
| Waste rock 4 | 0.05 | 0.199 | 550 m above sea level |
| River upstream 1 | 0.05 | 0.232 | Top of erosion-control dam 1 |
| River upstream 2 | 0.05 | 0.339 | Top of erosion-control dam 1 |
| River upstream 3 | 0.05 | 0.161 | Drinking water for village 1 in the dry season |
| Erosion-control dam 1 | 0.05 | 0.258 | |
| Erosion-control dam 2 | 0.05 | 0.138 | |
| Erosion-control dam 3 | 0.05 | 0.095 | |
| Reservoir floodgate | 0.05 | 1.790 |
aEnvironmental standards for water quality in the Republic of Korea (KMOE 2017b)
Fig. 3Pb and As concentrations in the soil in relation to the distance from the Indae abandoned metal mines
Fig. 4Correlations of Pb and As concentrations in soil samples
Fig. 5The 3-isotope plot (207/206Pb vs. 208/206Pb) of soil samples in the Indae abandoned metal mine area
Comparative urinary As concentrations in participants from the Indae abandoned metal mines area
| Sex | Indae minesa | Abandoned mines | Koreab | U.S RV95c | Reference values | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2014 | Total | ≥ 65 | ACGIHd | |||
| Total | 31.9 | 48.6 | 39.1 | 35.0 | 40.3 | 52.5 | 35.0 |
| Male | 30.8 | 48.3 | 41.3 | 36.7 | |||
| Female | 33.4 | 49.0 | 38.3 | 33.4 | |||
Unit: μg/L
aAs(III) + As(V) + MMA + DMA (Geometric Mean)
b1st Korea National Environmental Health Survey (KNEHS) (2009–2011) (NIER 2012)
cNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs), USA, (CDC 2015). “4th National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals”)
dAmerican Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH 2006). Biological Exposure Indices
Specific As urinary concentrations in participants from the Indae abandoned metal mines area
| Factors | AM ± SDa | GM (95% CI)b | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As(III) | 1.66 ± 0.94 | 1.45 (1.24, 1.71) | 0.54 | 4.19 |
| As(V) | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 0.74 (0.68, 0.81) | 0.61 | 1.05 |
| As(III) + As(V) | 1.89 ± 1.18 | 1.61 (1.35, 1.93) | 0.54 | 4.81 |
| MMA | 2.83 ± 1.64 | 2.43 (2.00, 2.92) | 0.87 | 6.97 |
| DMA | 32.31 ± 21.36 | 27.63 (23.25, 32.53) | 8.24 | 127.12 |
| MMA + DMA | 34.99 ± 22.17 | 30.13 (25.28, 36.07) | 9.11 | 129.64 |
| Arsenobetaine | 106.44 ± 75.69 | 88.62 (73.55, 107.15) | 26.93 | 422.51 |
| Harmful Asc | 36.88 ± 22.81 | 31.92 (27.67, 37.82) | 10.14 | 132.20 |
Unit: µg/L
aAM ± SD: arithmetic mean ± standard deviation
bGM: geometric mean; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval
cHarmful As: As(III) + As(V) + MMA + DMA
Fig. 6Urinary harmful As concentrations in relation to the individual characteristics of participants from the Indae abandoned metal mines area
Fig. 7Urinary harmful As concentrations in relation to the dietary characteristics of participants from the Indae abandoned metal mines area
Urinary harmful As concentrations by survey time for the same participants from the Indae abandoned metal mines area
| Factors1) | 2014 | 2015 1st survey | 2015 2nd survey | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ||
| As(III) + As(V) | 23.13a,b (13.07, 38.54) | 1.70a (1.25, 2.30) | 2.86b (2.34, 3.41) | 0.000 |
| MMA + DMA | 142.55c,d (85.43, 219.51) | 30.82c (22.71, 41.46) | 28.46d (22.70, 35.57) | 0.000 |
| Arsenobetaine | 48.07 (33.68, 68.53) | 77.77 (59.41, 100.57) | 42.79 (28.63, 62.15) | 0.000 |
| Harmful As2) | 167.06e,f (99.67, 263.09) | 32.78e (24.35, 43.35) | 30.80f (23.89, 38.12) | 0.000 |
Unit: µg/L
1)GM: geometric mean; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval
2)Harmful As: As(III) + As(V) + MMA + DMA
3)One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
a,b,c,d,e,fTukey’s Post Hoc Multiple Comparisons, the same letter indicates statistical significance