Literature DB >> 31015101

Different neural processes underlie visual speech perception in school-age children and adults: An event-related potentials study.

Natalya Kaganovich1, Elizabeth Ancel2.   

Abstract

The ability to use visual speech cues does not fully develop until late adolescence. The cognitive and neural processes underlying this slow maturation are not yet understood. We examined electrophysiological responses of younger (8-9 years) and older (11-12 years) children as well as adults elicited by visually perceived articulations in an audiovisual word matching task and related them to the amount of benefit gained during a speech-in-noise (SIN) perception task when seeing the talker's face. On each trial, participants first heard a word and, after a short pause, saw a speaker silently articulate a word. In half of the trials the articulated word matched the auditory word (congruent trials), whereas in the other half it did not (incongruent trials). In all three age groups, incongruent articulations elicited the N400 component and congruent articulations elicited the late positive complex (LPC). Groups did not differ in the mean amplitude of N400. The mean amplitude of LPC was larger in younger children compared with older children and adults. Importantly, the relationship between event-related potential measures and SIN performance varied by group. In 8- and 9-year-olds, neither component was predictive of SIN gain. The LPC amplitude predicted the SIN gain in older children but not in adults. Conversely, the N400 amplitude predicted the SIN gain in adults. We argue that although all groups were able to detect correspondences between auditory and visual word onsets at the phonemic/syllabic level, only adults could use this information for lexical access.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual matching; Audiovisual word perception; Late positive complex; Lexical access; Multisensory development; N400; Speech-in-noise perception

Year:  2019        PMID: 31015101      PMCID: PMC6857813          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  59 in total

1.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production.

Authors:  Stephen M Wilson; Ayşe Pinar Saygin; Martin I Sereno; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory.

Authors:  Michael D Rugg; Tim Curran
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  J L Metsala
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

5.  Forty Years After Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices: the McGurk Effect Revisited.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

6.  Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential.

Authors:  P Praamstra; D F Stegeman
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1993-04

7.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks.

Authors:  M D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The Role of Auditory and Visual Speech in Word Learning at 18 Months and in Adulthood.

Authors:  Mélanie Havy; Afra Foroud; Laurel Fais; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-01-26

9.  Distinct cortical locations for integration of audiovisual speech and the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Laura C Erickson; Brandon A Zielinski; Jennifer E V Zielinski; Guoying Liu; Peter E Turkeltaub; Amber M Leaver; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-02

10.  Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence.

Authors:  Muriel T N Panouillères; Rowan Boyles; Jennifer Chesters; Kate E Watkins; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Development of the Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Speech Perception Benefit.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  Evaluating Preschool Visual Attentional Selective-Set: Preliminary ERP Modeling and Simulation of Target Enhancement Homology.

Authors:  Amedeo D'Angiulli; Dao Anh Thu Pham; Gerry Leisman; Gary Goldfield
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-02-22

3.  Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual Speech Processing and the Role of Orofacial Effectors for Cross-Modal Predictions.

Authors:  Maëva Michon; Gonzalo Boncompte; Vladimir López
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.