OBJECTIVE: Alcohol-related sexual violence remains a public health problem. Despite the popularity of sexual assault bystander intervention programs, these may be limited in addressing bystander intoxication because the effects of intoxication on intervening in a sexual assault are unknown. Therefore, we tested the effects of alcohol intoxication on the five steps of bystander intervention in a sexual assault vignette. METHOD:Young adults (N = 128; 50% women) were randomly assigned to consume alcohol (target blood alcohol concentration = 0.08%; n = 64) or a nonalcoholic control beverage (n = 64) in a bar-laboratory. Next, participants were presented with a vignette describing events occurring in a convivial drinking context that ends with nonconsensual sexual behavior. Latané and Darley's bystander intervention model steps were assessed in a semistructured interview. RESULTS: Participants in the control condition recalled the story more accurately (Step 1: notice the event) and reported greater risk/need for intervention (Step 2), but they did not differ on the latter three steps of bystander intervention compared with alcohol-condition participants. Intoxication effects were similar for men and women. Furthermore, risk/need for intervention (Step 2) partially mediated the effect of alcohol condition on personal responsibility (Step 3) and relative benefits versus costs from intervening (Step 4). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention programs should consider the effects of alcohol on detecting a sexual assault and the need to intervene. If intoxicated bystanders do not detect a sexual assault, then bystanders will not reach the crucial steps (i.e., taking responsibility for intervening; willingness and ability to intervene) required to intervene successfully.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Alcohol-related sexual violence remains a public health problem. Despite the popularity of sexual assault bystander intervention programs, these may be limited in addressing bystander intoxication because the effects of intoxication on intervening in a sexual assault are unknown. Therefore, we tested the effects of alcohol intoxication on the five steps of bystander intervention in a sexual assault vignette. METHOD: Young adults (N = 128; 50% women) were randomly assigned to consume alcohol (target blood alcohol concentration = 0.08%; n = 64) or a nonalcoholic control beverage (n = 64) in a bar-laboratory. Next, participants were presented with a vignette describing events occurring in a convivial drinking context that ends with nonconsensual sexual behavior. Latané and Darley's bystander intervention model steps were assessed in a semistructured interview. RESULTS:Participants in the control condition recalled the story more accurately (Step 1: notice the event) and reported greater risk/need for intervention (Step 2), but they did not differ on the latter three steps of bystander intervention compared with alcohol-condition participants. Intoxication effects were similar for men and women. Furthermore, risk/need for intervention (Step 2) partially mediated the effect of alcohol condition on personal responsibility (Step 3) and relative benefits versus costs from intervening (Step 4). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention programs should consider the effects of alcohol on detecting a sexual assault and the need to intervene. If intoxicated bystanders do not detect a sexual assault, then bystanders will not reach the crucial steps (i.e., taking responsibility for intervening; willingness and ability to intervene) required to intervene successfully.
Authors: Alexander J Melkonian; Lindsay S Ham; Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; Kyle K Jackson; Alita M Mobley; Kristen N Jozkowski; Malachi Willis; Ana J Bridges Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2020-03-09
Authors: Erin E Bonar; Sarah DeGue; Antonia Abbey; Ann L Coker; Christine H Lindquist; Heather L McCauley; Elizabeth Miller; Charlene Y Senn; Martie P Thompson; Quyen M Ngo; Rebecca M Cunningham; Maureen A Walton Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2020-05-14
Authors: Kristen N Jozkowski; Malachi Willis; Lauren E Hurd; Lindsay S Ham; Ana J Bridges; Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley Journal: J Interpers Violence Date: 2019-07-17
Authors: Tatyana Mollayeva; Andrew Tran; Vincy Chan; Angela Colantonio; Michael D Escobar Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-01-30 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Ana J Bridges; Alita M Mobley; Isabel F Augur; Tiffany L Marcantonio; Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; Kristen N Jozkowski; Lindsay S Ham Journal: Violence Vict Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Ana J Bridges; Aubrey R Dueweke; Tiffany L Marcantonio; Lindsay S Ham; Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; Kristen N Jozkowski Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2020-07-16
Authors: Jacquelyn D Wiersma-Mosley; Lindsay S Ham; Tiffany L Marcantonio; Kristen N Jozkowski; Ana J Bridges Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 4.591