BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) at an older age are less likely to undergo genetic cancer risk assessment and genetic testing since the guidelines and referrals are biased toward earlier age at diagnosis. Thus, we determined the prevalence and type of pathogenic cancer predisposition variants among women with a history of BC diagnosed at the age of 65 years or older vs younger than 65 years. DESIGN: Prospective registration cohort. SETTING: The Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network, including 40 community-based clinics in the United States and 5 in Latin America. PARTICIPANTS: Women with BC and genetic testing results. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical variables, and genetic profiles were compared between women aged 65 years and older and those younger than 65 years at BC diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 588 women diagnosed with BC and aged 65 years and older and 9412 diagnosed at younger than 65 years, BC-associated pathogenic variants (PVs) were detected in 5.6% of those aged 65 years and older (n = 33) and 14.2% of those younger than 65 years (n = 1340) (P < .01). PVs in high-risk genes (eg, BRCA1 and BRCA2) represented 81.1% of carriers among women aged 65 years and older (n = 27) and 93.1% of those younger than 65 years (n = 1248) (P = .01). BRCA2 PVs represented 42.4% of high-risk gene findings for those aged 65 years and older, whereas BRCA1 PVs were most common among carriers younger than 65 years (49.7%). PVs (n = 7) in moderate-risk genes represented 21.2% for carriers aged 65 years and older and 7.3% of those younger than 65 years (n = 98; P < .01). CHEK2 PVs were the most common moderate-risk gene finding in both groups. CONCLUSION: Clinically actionable BC susceptibility PVs, particularly in BRCA2 and CHEK2, were relatively prevalent among older women undergoing genetic testing. The significant burden of PVs for older women with BC provides a critical reminder to recognize the full spectrum of eligibility and provide genetic testing for older women, rather than exclusion based on chronological age alone. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:884-888, 2019.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES:Women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) at an older age are less likely to undergo genetic cancer risk assessment and genetic testing since the guidelines and referrals are biased toward earlier age at diagnosis. Thus, we determined the prevalence and type of pathogenic cancer predisposition variants among women with a history of BC diagnosed at the age of 65 years or older vs younger than 65 years. DESIGN: Prospective registration cohort. SETTING: The Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network, including 40 community-based clinics in the United States and 5 in Latin America. PARTICIPANTS: Women with BC and genetic testing results. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical variables, and genetic profiles were compared between women aged 65 years and older and those younger than 65 years at BC diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 588 women diagnosed with BC and aged 65 years and older and 9412 diagnosed at younger than 65 years, BC-associated pathogenic variants (PVs) were detected in 5.6% of those aged 65 years and older (n = 33) and 14.2% of those younger than 65 years (n = 1340) (P < .01). PVs in high-risk genes (eg, BRCA1 and BRCA2) represented 81.1% of carriers among women aged 65 years and older (n = 27) and 93.1% of those younger than 65 years (n = 1248) (P = .01). BRCA2 PVs represented 42.4% of high-risk gene findings for those aged 65 years and older, whereas BRCA1 PVs were most common among carriers younger than 65 years (49.7%). PVs (n = 7) in moderate-risk genes represented 21.2% for carriers aged 65 years and older and 7.3% of those younger than 65 years (n = 98; P < .01). CHEK2 PVs were the most common moderate-risk gene finding in both groups. CONCLUSION: Clinically actionable BC susceptibility PVs, particularly in BRCA2 and CHEK2, were relatively prevalent among older women undergoing genetic testing. The significant burden of PVs for older women with BC provides a critical reminder to recognize the full spectrum of eligibility and provide genetic testing for older women, rather than exclusion based on chronological age alone. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:884-888, 2019.
Authors: Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Kirsten M Timms; Shuying Liu; Huiqin Chen; Jennifer K Litton; Jennifer Potter; Jerry S Lanchbury; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Bryan T Hennessy; Banu K Arun; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kim-Anh Do; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Grace L Smith; Arti Hurria; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kelly D Gonzalez; Katie A Noltner; Carolyn H Buzin; Dongqing Gu; Cindy Y Wen-Fong; Vu Q Nguyen; Jennifer H Han; Katrina Lowstuter; Jeffrey Longmate; Steve S Sommer; Jeffrey N Weitzel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tom Walsh; Silvia Casadei; Kathryn Hale Coats; Elizabeth Swisher; Sunday M Stray; Jake Higgins; Kevin C Roach; Jessica Mandell; Ming K Lee; Sona Ciernikova; Lenka Foretova; Pavel Soucek; Mary-Claire King Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-03-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael J Hall; Julia E Reid; Lynn A Burbidge; Dmitry Pruss; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Cynthia Frye; Richard J Wenstrup; Brian E Ward; Thomas A Scholl; Walter W Noll Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas P Slavin; Can-Lan Sun; Yanin Chavarri-Guerra; Mina S Sedrak; Vani Katheria; Danielle Castillo; Josef Herzog; William Dale; Arti Hurria; Jeffrey N Weitzel Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Siddhartha Yadav; Chunling Hu; Steven N Hart; Nicholas Boddicker; Eric C Polley; Jie Na; Rohan Gnanaolivu; Kun Y Lee; Tricia Lindstrom; Sebastian Armasu; Patrick Fitz-Gibbon; Karthik Ghosh; Daniela L Stan; Sandhya Pruthi; Lonzetta Neal; Nicole Sandhu; Deborah J Rhodes; Christine Klassen; Prema P Peethambaram; Tufia C Haddad; Janet E Olson; Tanya L Hoskin; Matthew P Goetz; Susan M Domchek; Judy C Boughey; Kathryn J Ruddy; Fergus J Couch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Neil Carleton; Azadeh Nasrazadani; Kristine Gade; Sushil Beriwal; Parul N Barry; Adam M Brufsky; Rohit Bhargava; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; G J van Londen; Oscar C Marroquin; Darcy L Thull; Phuong L Mai; Emilia J Diego; Michael T Lotze; Steffi Oesterreich; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Adrian V Lee Journal: Lancet Healthy Longev Date: 2022-01-05