Literature DB >> 31011772

Preoperative evaluation of tumour consistency in pituitary macroadenomas: a machine learning-based histogram analysis on conventional T2-weighted MRI.

Amalya Zeynalova1, Burak Kocak2, Emine Sebnem Durmaz3, Nil Comunoglu4, Kerem Ozcan4, Gamze Ozcan4, Okan Turk5, Necmettin Tanriover6, Naci Kocer1, Osman Kizilkilic1, Civan Islak1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential value of machine learning (ML)-based histogram analysis (or first-order texture analysis) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting consistency of pituitary macroadenomas (PMA) and to compare it with that of signal intensity ratio (SIR) evaluation.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients with 13 hard and 42 soft PMAs were included in this retrospective study. Histogram features were extracted from coronal T2-weighted original, filtered and transformed MRI images by manual segmentation. To achieve balanced classes (38 hard vs 42 soft), multiple samples were obtained from different slices of the PMAs with hard consistency. Dimension reduction was done with reproducibility analysis, collinearity analysis and feature selection. ML classifier was artificial neural network (ANN). Reference standard for the classifications was based on surgical and histopathological findings. Predictive performance of histogram analysis was compared with that of SIR evaluation. The main metric for comparisons was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Only 137 of 162 features had excellent reproducibility. Collinearity analysis yielded 20 features. Feature selection algorithm provided six texture features. For histogram analysis, the ANN correctly classified 72.5% of the PMAs regarding consistency with an AUC value of 0.710. For SIR evaluation, accuracy and AUC values were 74.5% and 0.551, respectively. Considering AUC values, ML-based histogram analysis performed better than SIR evaluation (z = 2.312, p = 0.021).
CONCLUSION: ML-based T2-weighted MRI histogram analysis might be a useful technique in predicting the consistency of PMAs, with a better predictive performance than that of SIR evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pituitary adenoma; Texture analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31011772     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02211-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  18 in total

1.  Identifying patients with neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease in Singapore using characteristic diffusion-weighted MR images.

Authors:  Wai-Yung Yu; Zheyu Xu; Hwei-Yee Lee; Aya Tokumaru; Jeanne M M Tan; Adeline Ng; Shigeo Murayama; C C Tchoyoson Lim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners.

Authors:  Burak Koçak; Emine Şebnem Durmaz; Ece Ateş; Özgür Kılıçkesmez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Machine Learning in Pituitary Surgery.

Authors:  Vittorio Stumpo; Victor E Staartjes; Luca Regli; Carlo Serra
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Application of artificial intelligence and radiomics in pituitary neuroendocrine and sellar tumors: a quantitative and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Kelvin Koong; Veronica Preda; Anne Jian; Benoit Liquet-Weiland; Antonio Di Ieva
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Prediction of high proliferative index in pituitary macroadenomas using MRI-based radiomics and machine learning.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ugga; Renato Cuocolo; Domenico Solari; Elia Guadagno; Alessandra D'Amico; Teresa Somma; Paolo Cappabianca; Maria Laura Del Basso de Caro; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Machine learning applications in imaging analysis for patients with pituitary tumors: a review of the current literature and future directions.

Authors:  Ashirbani Saha; Samantha Tso; Jessica Rabski; Alireza Sadeghian; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Biomarkers of pituitary macroadenomas aggressive behaviour: a conventional MRI and DWI 3T study.

Authors:  Alberto Conficoni; Paola Feraco; Diego Mazzatenta; Matteo Zoli; Sofia Asioli; Corrado Zenesini; Viscardo Paolo Fabbri; Martino Cellerini; Antonella Bacci
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Differentiation of Pituitary Adenoma from Rathke Cleft Cyst: Combining MR Image Features with Texture Features.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Chaoyue Chen; Zerong Tian; Yangfan Cheng; Jianguo Xu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Prediction of pituitary adenoma surgical consistency: radiomic data mining and machine learning on T2-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Renato Cuocolo; Lorenzo Ugga; Domenico Solari; Sergio Corvino; Alessandra D'Amico; Daniela Russo; Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Andrea Elefante
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Clinical relevance of tumor consistency in pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Alberto Acitores Cancela; Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal; Héctor Pian; Juan Salvador Martínez San Millán; Juan José Díez; Pedro Iglesias
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.885

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.