| Literature DB >> 31011360 |
Yufei Liu1, Xiaobo Wu1, Haowen Jiang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumption of diet high in soy products is suggested to contribute to lower prostate cancer incidence in Asian men. But little has been known about the influences of dietary patterns on gut microbiota and microbiota-mediated isoflavone metabolism. Here, we determined the influences of western pattern diet on prostate carcinogenesis, gut microbiota and microbiota-mediated equol metabolism using a transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) model.Entities:
Keywords: Daidzein; Equol; Gut microbiota; High fat diet; Prostate cancer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31011360 PMCID: PMC6460650 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-019-0351-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Composition of HFD and control diet
| Composition | HFD | Control diet | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gm% | gm% | gm% | Kcal% | |
| Protein | 17 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Carbohydrate | 52 | 45 | 69 | 69 |
| Fat | 20 | 40 | 7 | 16 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | ||
| Kcal/gm | 4.6 | 4.0 | ||
Fig. 1Images of histopathological diagnosis of HFD and CD mice prostate. The bar represents 50 μm
Fig. 2Serum concentrations of daidzein a and S-equol b in HFD and CD mice. Data were expressed as means ±SD. * indicates p < 0.05
Fig. 3Differentiated gut microbiome between HFD and CD mice. The average relative abundance of bacterial lineages of gut microbiota within HFD and CD group at the phylum a and family b level, and the key microbial phylotypes between the two groups c
LefSe analysis of phylotypes with biologically significant differential abundance
| Differential phylotypes by LefSe | Relative abundance (%) | Ratio HFD to CD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HFD | CD | ||
| Class | |||
| Bacteroidia | 66.527 | 57.100 | 1.17 |
| TM7–3 | 1.331 | 0.452 | 2.94 |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 0.318 | 0.012 | 26.5 |
| Alphaproteobacteria | 0.316 | 0.085 | 3.72 |
| Order | |||
| Bacteroidales | 66.527 | 57.100 | 1.17 |
| CW040 | 1.331 | 0.452 | 2.94 |
| Pseudomonadales | 0.318 | 0 | – |
| RF32 | 0.280 | 0.083 | 3.37 |
| Lactobacillales | 0.151 | 0.954 | 0.16 |
| Rhizobiales | 0.022 | 1.97E-05 | 1116.75 |
| Enterobacteriales | 0 | 0.012 | – |
| Family | |||
| Porphyromonadaceae | 1.357 | 0.279 | 4.86 |
| F16 | 1.331 | 0.452 | 2.94 |
| Prevotellaceae | 0.450 | 0.215 | 2.09 |
| Clostridiaceae | 0.306 | 0.130 | 2.35 |
| Moraxellaceae | 0.180 | 0 | – |
| Lactobacillaceae | 0.149 | 0.858 | 0.17 |
| Pseudomonadaceae | 0.138 | 0 | – |
| Mogibacteriaceae | 0.131 | 0.432 | 0.30 |
| Brucellaceae | 0.022 | 1.97E-05 | 1116.75 |
| Streptococcaceae | 1.97E-05 | 0.029 | 0.001 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 0 | 0.012 | – |
| Genus | |||
| Parabacteroides | 1.357 | 0.279 | 4.86 |
| Paraprevotella | 0.416 | 0.034 | 12.24 |
| Ruminococcus | 0.310 | 0.878 | 0.35 |
| Lactobacillus | 0.149 | 0.858 | 0.17 |
| Pseudomonas | 0.138 | 0 | – |
| Adlercreutzia | 0.080 | 0.278 | 0.29 |
| Christensenella | 0.053 | 3.94E-05 | 1345.18 |
| Ochrobactrum | 0.022 | 1.97E-05 | 1116.75 |
| Rikenella | 0 | 0.085 | – |
| Lactococcus | 0 | 0.029 | – |