Michael D Elliott1, John F Heitner2, Han Kim2, Edwin Wu3, Michele A Parker2, Daniel C Lee3, Dixon B Kaufman4, Robert O Bonow3, Robert Judd2, Raymond J Kim2. 1. Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center and Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC michael.elliott@atriumhealth.org. 2. Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center and Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 3. Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 4. Division of Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of unrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) by delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective, two-center study of asymptomatic patients without known cardiac disease (n = 120), two prespecified cohorts underwent a research MRI: 1) a high-risk group with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency (n = 50) and 2) an average-risk group with type 2 diabetes (n = 70). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and clinical MI. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of unrecognized MI was 19% by DE-MRI (28% high-risk group and 13% average-risk group) and 5% by electrocardiography. During up to 5 years of follow-up with a total of 460 patient-years of follow-up, the rate of death/MI was markedly higher in patients with diabetes with (vs. without) unrecognized MI (all 44% vs. 7%, high-risk group 43% vs. 6%, and average-risk group 44% vs. 8%; all P < 0.01). After adjustment for Framingham risk score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes type, the presence of unrecognized MI by DE-MRI conferred an eightfold increase in risk of death/MI (95% CI 3.0-21.1, P < 0.0001). Addition of unrecognized MI to clinical indices significantly improved model discrimination for adverse events (integrated discrimination improvement = 0.156, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized MI is prevalent in asymptomatic patients with diabetes without a history of cardiac disease and confers a markedly increased risk of death and clinical MI.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of unrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) by delayed-enhancement MRI (DE-MRI) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective, two-center study of asymptomatic patients without known cardiac disease (n = 120), two prespecified cohorts underwent a research MRI: 1) a high-risk group with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency (n = 50) and 2) an average-risk group with type 2 diabetes (n = 70). The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and clinical MI. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence of unrecognized MI was 19% by DE-MRI (28% high-risk group and 13% average-risk group) and 5% by electrocardiography. During up to 5 years of follow-up with a total of 460 patient-years of follow-up, the rate of death/MI was markedly higher in patients with diabetes with (vs. without) unrecognized MI (all 44% vs. 7%, high-risk group 43% vs. 6%, and average-risk group 44% vs. 8%; all P < 0.01). After adjustment for Framingham risk score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and diabetes type, the presence of unrecognized MI by DE-MRI conferred an eightfold increase in risk of death/MI (95% CI 3.0-21.1, P < 0.0001). Addition of unrecognized MI to clinical indices significantly improved model discrimination for adverse events (integrated discrimination improvement = 0.156, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized MI is prevalent in asymptomatic patients with diabetes without a history of cardiac disease and confers a markedly increased risk of death and clinical MI.
Authors: Raymond Y Kwong; Anna K Chan; Kenneth A Brown; Carmen W Chan; H Glenn Reynolds; Sui Tsang; Roger B Davis Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; Tobias Gilk; J Rod Gimbel; John Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Yoav Parag; Daniel J Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek-Scoumis; Jeffrey Weinreb; Loren A Zaremba; Pamela Wilcox; Leonard Lucey; Nancy Sass Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jay S Skyler; Richard Bergenstal; Robert O Bonow; John Buse; Prakash Deedwania; Edwin A M Gale; Barbara V Howard; M Sue Kirkman; Mikhail Kosiborod; Peter Reaven; Robert S Sherwin Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Raymond Y Kwong; Hamid Sattar; Henry Wu; Gabriel Vorobiof; Vijay Gandla; Kevin Steel; Samuel Siu; Kenneth A Brown Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-08-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barbara V Howard; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Jerome L Fleg; James M Galloway; Jeffrey A Henderson; Wm James Howard; Elisa T Lee; Mihriye Mete; Bryce Poolaw; Robert E Ratner; Marie Russell; Angela Silverman; Mario Stylianou; Jason G Umans; Wenyu Wang; Matthew R Weir; Neil J Weissman; Charlton Wilson; Fawn Yeh; Jianhui Zhu Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Han W Kim; Igor Klem; Dipan J Shah; Edwin Wu; Sheridan N Meyers; Michele A Parker; Anna Lisa Crowley; Robert O Bonow; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Michael D Elliott; John F Heitner; Han Kim; Edwin Wu; Michelle A Parker; Daniel C Lee; Dixon B Kaufman; Robert O Bonow; Robert Judd; Raymond J Kim Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 19.112