Literature DB >> 16754804

Impact of unrecognized myocardial scar detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on event-free survival in patients presenting with signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease.

Raymond Y Kwong1, Anna K Chan, Kenneth A Brown, Carmen W Chan, H Glenn Reynolds, Sui Tsang, Roger B Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can determine the extent of myocardial scar from infarction (MI). However, the prognostic significance of unrecognized myocardial scar by CMR in patients without a history of MI is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients without a known prior MI underwent CMR for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). We assessed the prognostic value of LGE and other CMR variables beyond the strongest clinical predictors and built the best overall models for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiac mortality. During a median follow-up of 16 months, 31 patients (18%) experienced MACE, including 17 deaths. LGE demonstrated the strongest unadjusted associations with MACE and cardiac mortality (hazard ratios of 8.29 and 10.9, respectively; both P<0.0001). Patients in the lowest tertile of LGE-involved myocardium (mean LV mass, 1.4%) experienced a >7-fold increased risk for MACE. By multivariable analyses, LGE was independently associated with MACE beyond the clinical model (P<0.0001) or the clinical model combined with angiographically significant coronary stenosis (P=0.0007), LV ejection fraction (P=0.001), LV end-systolic volume index (P=0.0006), or segmental WMA (P=0.002). LGE remained the strongest predictor selected in the best overall models for MACE and cardiac mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease but without a history of MI, LGE involving a small amount of myocardium carries a high cardiac risk. In addition, LGE provides incremental prognostic value to MACE and cardiac mortality beyond common clinical, angiographic, and functional predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754804     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.570648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  221 in total

Review 1.  Established and emerging cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of stable coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Manish Motwani; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  Correlation between ECG abnormalities and cardiac parameters in highly trained asymptomatic male endurance athletes: evaluation using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gunnar Erz; Stefanie Mangold; Erik Franzen; Claus D Claussen; Andreas M Niess; Christof Burgstahler; Ulrich Kramer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Reperfusion injury components and manifestations determined by cardiovascular MR and MDCT imaging.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve Hetts; Mark Wilson
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

6.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Luciana F Seabra; François-Pierre Mongeon; Shuaib M Abdullah; Sanjeev A Francis; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

Review 7.  Are There Deleterious Cardiac Effects of Acute and Chronic Endurance Exercise?

Authors:  Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Antonio B Fernandez; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  The incidence, pattern, and prognostic value of left ventricular myocardial scar by late gadolinium enhancement in patients with atrial fibrillation .

Authors:  Tomas G Neilan; Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Hoshang Farhad; John D Groarke; John A Dodson; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Ciaran J McMullan; Bobak Heydari; Gregory F Michaud; Roy M John; Rob van der Geest; Michael L Steigner; Ron Blankstein; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

10.  T1 Mapping in cardiomyopathy at cardiac MR: comparison with endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  Christopher T Sibley; Radwa A Noureldin; Neville Gai; Marcelo Souto Nacif; Songtao Liu; Evrim B Turkbey; James O Mudd; Rob J van der Geest; João A C Lima; Marc K Halushka; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.