Sumsum P Sunny1, Sagar Agarwal2, Bonney Lee James3, Emon Heidari4, Anjana Muralidharan3, Vishal Yadav2, Vijay Pillai2, Vivek Shetty2, Zhongping Chen4, Naveen Hedne2, Petra Wilder-Smith4, Amritha Suresh1, Moni Abraham Kuriakose5. 1. Head and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health City, Bangalore, India; Integrated Head and Neck Oncology Program (DSRG-5), Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, NH Health City, Bangalore, India. 2. Head and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health City, Bangalore, India. 3. Integrated Head and Neck Oncology Program (DSRG-5), Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, NH Health City, Bangalore, India. 4. Beckman Laser Institute, UCI, Irvine, USA. 5. Head and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health City, Bangalore, India; Integrated Head and Neck Oncology Program (DSRG-5), Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, NH Health City, Bangalore, India. Electronic address: makuriakose@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Surgical margin status is a significant determinant of treatment outcome in oral cancer. Negative surgical margins can decrease the loco-regional recurrence by five-fold. The current standard of care of intraoperative clinical examination supplemented by histological frozen section, can result in a risk of positive margins from 5 to 17 percent. In this study, we attempted to assess the utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging with automated diagnostic algorithm to improve on the current method of clinical evaluation of surgical margin in oral cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have used a modified handheld OCT device with automated algorithm based diagnostic platform for imaging. Intraoperatively, images of 125 sites were captured from multiple zones around the tumor of oral cancer patients (n = 14) and compared with the clinical and pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: OCT showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, equivalent to histological diagnosis (kappa, ĸ = 0.922), in detection of malignancy within tumor and tumor margin areas. In comparison, for dysplastic lesions, OCT-based detection showed a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 68.8% and a moderate concordance with histopathology diagnosis (ĸ = 0.59). Additionally, the OCT scores could significantly differentiate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from dysplastic lesions (mild/moderate/severe; p ≤ 0.005) as well as the latter from the non-dysplastic lesions (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current challenges associated with clinical examination-based margin assessment could be improved with intra-operative OCT imaging. OCT is capable of identifying microscopic tumor at the surgical margins and demonstrated the feasibility of mapping of field cancerization around the tumor.
OBJECTIVES: Surgical margin status is a significant determinant of treatment outcome in oral cancer. Negative surgical margins can decrease the loco-regional recurrence by five-fold. The current standard of care of intraoperative clinical examination supplemented by histological frozen section, can result in a risk of positive margins from 5 to 17 percent. In this study, we attempted to assess the utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging with automated diagnostic algorithm to improve on the current method of clinical evaluation of surgical margin in oral cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have used a modified handheld OCT device with automated algorithm based diagnostic platform for imaging. Intraoperatively, images of 125 sites were captured from multiple zones around the tumor of oral cancerpatients (n = 14) and compared with the clinical and pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: OCT showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, equivalent to histological diagnosis (kappa, ĸ = 0.922), in detection of malignancy within tumor and tumor margin areas. In comparison, for dysplastic lesions, OCT-based detection showed a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 68.8% and a moderate concordance with histopathology diagnosis (ĸ = 0.59). Additionally, the OCT scores could significantly differentiate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from dysplastic lesions (mild/moderate/severe; p ≤ 0.005) as well as the latter from the non-dysplastic lesions (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The current challenges associated with clinical examination-based margin assessment could be improved with intra-operative OCT imaging. OCT is capable of identifying microscopic tumor at the surgical margins and demonstrated the feasibility of mapping of field cancerization around the tumor.
Authors: Waseem Jerjes; Tahwinder Upile; Brendan Conn; Zaid Hamdoon; Christian S Betz; Gordon McKenzie; Hani Radhi; Michael Vourvachis; Mohammed El Maaytah; Ann Sandison; Amrita Jay; Colin Hopper Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 1.651
Authors: Catherine F Poh; Lewei Zhang; Don W Anderson; J Scott Durham; P Michele Williams; Robert W Priddy; Ken W Berean; Samson Ng; Olivia L Tseng; Calum MacAulay; Miriam P Rosin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Andrew E Heidari; Tiffany T Pham; Ibe Ifegwu; Ross Burwell; William B Armstrong; Tjoa Tjoson; Stephanie Whyte; Carmen Giorgioni; Beverly Wang; Brian J F Wong; Zhongping Chen Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2020-01-12 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Mary J Coleman; Laura E Selmic; Jonathan P Samuelson; Ryan Jennings; Pin-Chieh Huang; Eric M McLaughlin; Vincent A Wavreille; Josephine A Dornbusch; Janis Lapsley; James Howard; Edward Cheng; Alex Kalamaras; Kendra Hearon; Megan Cray; Janet Grimes; Brandan Wustefeld-Janssens; Katie Kennedy; Owen Skinner; Pierre Amsellem; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Vet Comp Oncol Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 2.613
Authors: Eric C Yang; Imran S Vohra; Hawraa Badaoui; Richard A Schwarz; Katelin D Cherry; Justin Jacob; Jessica Rodriguez; Michelle D Williams; Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Ann M Gillenwater; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.147