Literature DB >> 31010617

Intra-operative point-of-procedure delineation of oral cancer margins using optical coherence tomography.

Sumsum P Sunny1, Sagar Agarwal2, Bonney Lee James3, Emon Heidari4, Anjana Muralidharan3, Vishal Yadav2, Vijay Pillai2, Vivek Shetty2, Zhongping Chen4, Naveen Hedne2, Petra Wilder-Smith4, Amritha Suresh1, Moni Abraham Kuriakose5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgical margin status is a significant determinant of treatment outcome in oral cancer. Negative surgical margins can decrease the loco-regional recurrence by five-fold. The current standard of care of intraoperative clinical examination supplemented by histological frozen section, can result in a risk of positive margins from 5 to 17 percent. In this study, we attempted to assess the utility of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging with automated diagnostic algorithm to improve on the current method of clinical evaluation of surgical margin in oral cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have used a modified handheld OCT device with automated algorithm based diagnostic platform for imaging. Intraoperatively, images of 125 sites were captured from multiple zones around the tumor of oral cancer patients (n = 14) and compared with the clinical and pathologic diagnosis.
RESULTS: OCT showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%, equivalent to histological diagnosis (kappa, ĸ = 0.922), in detection of malignancy within tumor and tumor margin areas. In comparison, for dysplastic lesions, OCT-based detection showed a sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 68.8% and a moderate concordance with histopathology diagnosis (ĸ = 0.59). Additionally, the OCT scores could significantly differentiate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from dysplastic lesions (mild/moderate/severe; p ≤ 0.005) as well as the latter from the non-dysplastic lesions (p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The current challenges associated with clinical examination-based margin assessment could be improved with intra-operative OCT imaging. OCT is capable of identifying microscopic tumor at the surgical margins and demonstrated the feasibility of mapping of field cancerization around the tumor.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysplasia; Field cancerization; Optical coherence tomography; Oral cancer; Tumor margin

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31010617      PMCID: PMC6954689          DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  36 in total

1.  Update on oral epithelial dysplasia and progression to cancer.

Authors:  Paul M Speight
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2007-11-30

2.  In vitro examination of suspicious oral lesions using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Waseem Jerjes; Tahwinder Upile; Brendan Conn; Zaid Hamdoon; Christian S Betz; Gordon McKenzie; Hani Radhi; Michael Vourvachis; Mohammed El Maaytah; Ann Sandison; Amrita Jay; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 3.  Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamad Adam Bujang; Tassha Hilda Adnan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

4.  Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultations. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 90,538 cases in 461 institutions.

Authors:  G N Gephardt; R J Zarbo
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Fluorescence visualization detection of field alterations in tumor margins of oral cancer patients.

Authors:  Catherine F Poh; Lewei Zhang; Don W Anderson; J Scott Durham; P Michele Williams; Robert W Priddy; Ken W Berean; Samson Ng; Olivia L Tseng; Calum MacAulay; Miriam P Rosin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Evaluation of a Combined Reflectance Confocal Microscopy-Optical Coherence Tomography Device for Detection and Depth Assessment of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Aditi Sahu; Oriol Yélamos; Nicusor Iftimia; Miguel Cordova; Christi Alessi-Fox; Melissa Gill; Gopi Maguluri; Stephen W Dusza; Cristián Navarrete-Dechent; Salvador González; Anthony M Rossi; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Chih-Shan J Chen
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 10.282

7.  Narrow band imaging in the intra-operative definition of resection margins in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Giancarlo Tirelli; Marco Piovesana; Annalisa Gatto; Margherita Tofanelli; Matteo Biasotto; Francesca Boscolo Nata
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Epithelial dysplasia in oral cavity.

Authors:  Samaneh Shirani; Neda Kargahi; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Solmaz Homayoni
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09

10.  Clinical implications and utility of field cancerization.

Authors:  Gabriel D Dakubo; John P Jakupciak; Mark A Birch-Machin; Ryan L Parr
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.722

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Improving Oral Cancer Outcomes with Imaging and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  B Ilhan; K Lin; P Guneri; P Wilder-Smith
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  The use of optical coherence tomography and convolutional neural networks to distinguish normal and abnormal oral mucosa.

Authors:  Andrew E Heidari; Tiffany T Pham; Ibe Ifegwu; Ross Burwell; William B Armstrong; Tjoa Tjoson; Stephanie Whyte; Carmen Giorgioni; Beverly Wang; Brian J F Wong; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 3.207

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for surgical margin assessment of feline injection-site sarcoma.

Authors:  Mary J Coleman; Laura E Selmic; Jonathan P Samuelson; Ryan Jennings; Pin-Chieh Huang; Eric M McLaughlin; Vincent A Wavreille; Josephine A Dornbusch; Janis Lapsley; James Howard; Edward Cheng; Alex Kalamaras; Kendra Hearon; Megan Cray; Janet Grimes; Brandan Wustefeld-Janssens; Katie Kennedy; Owen Skinner; Pierre Amsellem; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.613

4.  Binary dose level classification of tumour microvascular response to radiotherapy using artificial intelligence analysis of optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Anamitra Majumdar; Nader Allam; W Jeffrey Zabel; Valentin Demidov; Costel Flueraru; I Alex Vitkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Intraoperative In Vivo Imaging Modalities in Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Margin Delineation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kurtis Young; Enze Ma; Sameer Kejriwal; Torbjoern Nielsen; Sukhkaran S Aulakh; Andrew C Birkeland
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Prospective evaluation of oral premalignant lesions using a multimodal imaging system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Eric C Yang; Imran S Vohra; Hawraa Badaoui; Richard A Schwarz; Katelin D Cherry; Justin Jacob; Jessica Rodriguez; Michelle D Williams; Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Ann M Gillenwater; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.