| Literature DB >> 31010424 |
Adi Lukas Kurniawan1, Chien-Yeh Hsu2,3, Hsiao-Hsien Rau4, Li-Yin Lin1, Jane C-J Chao5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), characterized by impaired kidney function, affects over 1.5 million individuals in Taiwan. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is commonly found in patients with CKD, and the increased prevalence of obesity can have some implications for the risk of both CKD and CVD. Since diet plays an important role in the development of obesity, CVD and CKD, our study was designed to investigate the association of kidney function-related dietary pattern with weight status, cardiovascular risk factors, and the severity of impaired kidney function in middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular risk factors; Dietary pattern; Kidney function; Reduced rank regression; Weight status
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31010424 PMCID: PMC6477746 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-019-0452-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Fig. 1The dietary pattern derived from the reduced rank regression model. WHR waist-to-hip ratio, TG triglycerides, LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TC/HDL-C total cholesterol-to-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio, BUN blood urea nitrogen
Characteristics of the participants aged ≥40 years old by kidney function status obtained from MJ Health Institute between 2008 and 2010
| Total | Mildly impaired kidney functiona | Moderately/Severely impaired kidney functionb |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 52.6 ± 9.9 | 51.7 ± 9.3 | 62.9 ± 11.1 | < 0.001 |
| Sex, males | 21,376 (52.0) | 19,682 (52.0) | 1694 (52.2) | 0.800 |
| Smoking status, current | 6717 (16.3) | 6304 (16.6) | 413 (12.7) | < 0.001 |
| Drinking status, yes | 6420 (15.6) | 6032 (15.9) | 388 (12.0) | < 0.001 |
| Physical activity, yes | 10,814 (26.3) | 9988 (26.4) | 816 (25.1) | < 0.001 |
| High cardiovascular risk profile | 2489 (6.1) | 1933 (5.1) | 556 (17.1) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension status | 11,779 (28.6) | 10,008 (26.4) | 1771 (54.6) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes status | 3974 (9.7) | 3291 (8.7) | 683 (21.0) | < 0.001 |
| Weight status | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.0 ± 3.3 | 23.9 ± 3.3 | 24.7 ± 3.5 | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference | 79.7 ± 9.7 | 79.4 ± 9.7 | 82.5 ± 10.1 | < 0.001 |
| Hip circumference | 95.2 ± 5.9 | 95.2 ± 5.9 | 95.4 ± 6.1 | 0.044 |
| WHR | 0.9 ± 1.4 | 0.9 ± 1.4 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 |
| Body fat mass (%) | 27.4 ± 6.9 | 27.3 ± 6.8 | 27.9 ± 7.5 | < 0.001 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||
| SBP (mmHg) | 122.5 ± 18.2 | 121.8 ± 17.8 | 131.0 ± 20.2 | < 0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.8 ± 11.8 | 73.6 ± 11.7 | 76.2 ± 12.1 | < 0.001 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.9 ± 1.3 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.4 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | < 0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 0.8 | < 0.001 |
| TC/HDL-C | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | < 0.001 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 |
| Phosphorus (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.816 |
| Albumin, inflammatory biomarker, and kidney function | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | < 0.001 |
| CRP (nmol/L) | 22.5 ± 47.9 | 21.4 ± 43.4 | 33.7 ± 81.0 | < 0.001 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.2 ± 1.5 | 5.0 ± 1.2 | 6.9 ± 2.8 | < 0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 89.5 ± 22.2 | 86.8 ± 13.7 | 120.5 ± 54.8 | < 0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 73.7 ± 9.9 | 75.7 ± 7.5 | 52.6 ± 8.6 | < 0.001 |
| Proteinuria | < 0.001 | |||
| + 1 | 39,311 (95.6) | 36,623 (96.7) | 2688 (82.8) | |
| + 2 | 1041 (2.5) | 819 (2.2) | 222 (6.8) | |
| ≥ + 3 | 776 (1.9) | 440 (1.1) | 336 (10.4) | |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist-to-hip ratio, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FBG fasting blood glucose, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TC/HDL-C total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio, CRP C-reactive protein, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate. Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD, and categorical data are presented as numbers (percentage)
aMildly impaired kidney function was defined as eGFR 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2
bModerately/severely impaired kidney function was defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2
cThe P-value was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables
Multivariable logistic regression of weight status and cardiovascular risk factors for moderately/severely impaired kidney function
| Model 1a | Model 2b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Weight status | ||||
| BMI, ref.: normal | ||||
| Overweight ( | 1.32 (1.21–1.44) | < 0.001 | 1.25 (1.12–1.39) | < 0.001 |
| Obese ( | 1.58 (1.43–1.75) | < 0.001 | 1.28 (1.12–1.45) | < 0.001 |
| High waist circumference ( | 1.29 (1.19–1.40) | < 0.001 | 1.10 (0.99–1.22) | 0.052 |
| High WHR ( | 1.27 (1.17–1.37) | < 0.001 | 1.11 (1.00–1.23) | 0.039 |
| High body fat mass ( | 1.24 (1.15–1.35) | < 0.001 | 1.06 (0.97–1.17) | 0.219 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||||
| Hypertension ( | 1.57 (1.44–1.70) | < 0.001 | 1.43 (1.29–1.58) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes ( | 1.48 (1.34–1.63) | < 0.001 | 1.30 (1.15–1.48) | < 0.001 |
| High TG ( | 1.51 (1.36–1.67) | < 0.001 | 1.44 (1.27–1.63) | < 0.001 |
| High TC ( | 1.44 (1.32–1.58) | < 0.001 | 1.39 (1.25–1.55) | < 0.001 |
| Low HDL-C ( | 1.41 (1.22–1.64) | < 0.001 | 1.40 (1.18–1.67) | < 0.001 |
| High LDL-C ( | 1.40 (1.27–1.54) | < 0.001 | 1.30 (1.16–1.46) | < 0.001 |
| High TC/HDL-C ( | 1.62 (1.44–1.84) | < 0.001 | 1.52 (1.31–1.77) | < 0.001 |
| Hypercalcemia ( | 1.52 (1.40–1.65) | < 0.001 | 1.56 (1.41–1.72) | < 0.001 |
| High phosphorus ( | 1.10 (1.01–1.20) | 0.037 | 1.11 (1.00–1.23) | 0.046 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist-to-hip ratio, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TC/HDL-C total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio
aModel 1 was adjusted for age and gender (for weight status category). For cardiovascular risk factors category, model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, and BMI
bModel 2 was adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, high cardiovascular risk profile, hypertension status, diabetes status, albumin, and CRP (for weight status category). For cardiovascular risk factor category, model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, high cardiovascular risk profile, hypertension status (except hypertension variable), diabetes status (except diabetes variable), albumin, and CRP
Factor loadings and variance of dietary pattern scores identified by the reduced rank regression model
| Food group | Explained variance (%) | Factor loadinga |
|---|---|---|
| Preserved vegetables, processed meat or fish | 21.35 | 0.38 |
| Rice/flour p | 15.32 | 0.32 |
| Meat | 14.69 | 0.32 |
| Soy sauce or other dipping sauce | 14.07 | 0.31 |
| Organ meats | 13.79 | 0.31 |
| Fried rice/flour products | 8.83 | 0.25 |
| Instant noodles | 6.37 | 0.21 |
| Fruit | 8.20 | −0.24 |
| Dark-colored vegetables | 7.70 | −0.23 |
| Breads | 7.47 | −0.23 |
| Beans/bean products | 6.92 | −0.22 |
| Eggs | 5.33 | 0.19 |
| Seafood | 4.86 | 0.18 |
| Deep fried foods | 4.31 | 0.17 |
| Dairy products | 3.60 | −0.16 |
| Sugary drinks | 1.24 | 0.09 |
| Milk | 0.76 | −0.07 |
| Light-colored vegetables | 0.70 | −0.07 |
| Root crops | 0.62 | −0.07 |
| Fried vegetables/salad dressing | 0.35 | −0.05 |
| Jam/honey | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Whole grains | 0.08 | −0.02 |
a factor loadings are the correlations between food groups and dietary pattern scores. A positive factor loading value of food groups indicates a positive correlation with dietary pattern score, and vice versa
The association of dietary pattern scores with weight status, cardiovascular risk factors, and the severity of impaired kidney function (n = 41,128)a
| Dietary pattern scores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 | Tertile 2b | Tertile 3c | |||
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| ||
| Weight status | |||||
| BMI | |||||
| Overweight | 1.00 | 1.13 (1.06–1.21) | < 0.001 | 1.36 (1.27–1.46) | < 0.001 |
| Obese | 1.00 | 1.43 (1.31–1.57) | < 0.001 | 2.07 (1.89–2.27) | < 0.001 |
| High waist circumference | 1.00 | 1.28 (1.19–1.38) | < 0.001 | 1.72 (1.60–1.85) | < 0.001 |
| High WHR | 1.00 | 1.24 (1.16–1.32) | < 0.001 | 1.70 (1.59–1.82) | < 0.001 |
| High body fat mass | 1.00 | 1.24 (1.17–1.33) | < 0.001 | 1.58 (1.48–1.68) | < 0.001 |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | |||||
| Hypertension | 1.00 | 1.02 (0.95–1.10) | 0.62 | 1.04 (0.96–1.12) | 0.31 |
| Diabetes | 1.00 | 1.12 (1.00–1.24) | 0.047 | 1.15 (1.03–1.28) | 0.014 |
| High TG | 1.00 | 1.13 (1.03–1.24) | 0.012 | 1.24 (1.13–1.37) | < 0.001 |
| High TC | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.95–1.11) | 0.47 | 1.23 (1.14–1.33) | < 0.001 |
| Low HDL-C | 1.00 | 1.05 (0.92–1.20) | 0.49 | 1.00 (0.88–1.15) | 0.96 |
| High LDL-C | 1.00 | 1.01 (0.93–1.10) | 0.78 | 1.17 (1.08–1.28) | < 0.001 |
| High TC/HDL-C | 1.00 | 1.14 (1.01–1.28) | 0.032 | 1.31 (1.17–1.47) | < 0.001 |
| Hypercalcemia | 1.00 | 1.05 (0.98–1.12) | 0.29 | 1.10 (1.02–1.17) | 0.003 |
| High phosphorus (≥ 1.2 mmol/L) | 1.00 | 0.98 (0.92–1.04) | 0.51 | 1.00 (0.94–1.07) | 0.98 |
| Severity of kidney function | |||||
| Moderately/severely impaired | 1.00 | 1.12 (1.00–1.25) | 0.049 | 1.15 (1.02–1.29) | 0.019 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist-to-hip ratio, TG triglycerides, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, TC/HDL-C total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio
aAdjusted for model 2. Weight status category was adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, high cardiovascular risk profile, hypertension status, diabetes status, albumin, and CRP. Cardiovascular risk factors and the severity of kidney function categories were adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, high cardiovascular risk profile, hypertension status (except hypertension variable), diabetes status (except diabetes variable), albumin, and CRP. Tertile 1 (dietary pattern score: −1.34-1.22, n = 13,769) was used for the reference
bTertile 2 (dietary pattern scores: 1.23–1.89, n = 13,656)
cTertile 3 (dietary pattern scores: 1.90–6.55, n = 13,703)